[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What package could we give Portland for pick #13?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/9/2008  2:01 PM
Malik Rose Mardy Collins and a 2012 lottery protected 1 for Jarret Jack Joel Pryzbila and pick 13
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
6/9/2008  2:03 PM
i would offer a 2027 lottery protected #1 w/ even heavier protection in 2042.

how in the blue hell is this helping portland in any way shape or form?
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172
6/9/2008  2:04 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

Malik Rose Mardy Collins and a 2012 lottery protected 1 for Jarret Jack Joel Pryzbila and pick 13

Just awful!
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/9/2008  2:05 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i would offer a 2027 lottery protected #1 w/ even heavier protection in 2042.

Depends on who is projected for the 2027 draft or if they've been born yet. I don't think they'd take lottery protection, though. Portland will have to be sure that the next Shaq is current in somebody's womb.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172
6/9/2008  2:06 PM
Probably Lee straight up maybe Jamal coupled with a future second rounder.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/9/2008  2:06 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i would offer a 2027 lottery protected #1 w/ even heavier protection in 2042.

how in the blue hell is this helping portland in any way shape or form?

Extra cap space and get a future 1 when they may need it. They certainly dont need JJ anymore.
RIP Crushalot😞
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172
6/9/2008  2:10 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by djsunyc:

i would offer a 2027 lottery protected #1 w/ even heavier protection in 2042.

how in the blue hell is this helping portland in any way shape or form?

Extra cap space and get a future 1 when they may need it. They certainly dont need JJ anymore.

Your trade didn't satisfy any of their rumored need. They want a veteran player, preferably a scorer

LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
6/9/2008  2:12 PM
Briggs, I've proposed the following package a bunch of times on here.

David Lee for pick 13+Sergio Rodriquez.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/9/2008  2:17 PM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Briggs, I've proposed the following package a bunch of times on here.

David Lee for pick 13+Sergio Rodriquez.

If David Lee was unwilling to sign with us for a reasonable amount--then of course David Lee is an option to move.
RIP Crushalot😞
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172
6/9/2008  2:21 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by nyk4ever:

Briggs, I've proposed the following package a bunch of times on here.

David Lee for pick 13+Sergio Rodriquez.

If David Lee was unwilling to sign with us for a reasonable amount--then of course David Lee is an option to move.

An option to move at what point? The 13 pick will only be on the table for the next 2weeks. Not in case we end up liking who they pick and try and swing a deal post draft.
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
6/9/2008  2:23 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by nyk4ever:

Briggs, I've proposed the following package a bunch of times on here.

David Lee for pick 13+Sergio Rodriquez.

If David Lee was unwilling to sign with us for a reasonable amount--then of course David Lee is an option to move.

An option to move at what point? The 13 pick will only be on the table for the next 2weeks. Not in case we end up liking who they pick and try and swing a deal post draft.
Port can draft a player then trade his draft rights before signing him. Happens all the time.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172
6/9/2008  2:36 PM
Posted by fishmike:
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by nyk4ever:

Briggs, I've proposed the following package a bunch of times on here.

David Lee for pick 13+Sergio Rodriquez.

If David Lee was unwilling to sign with us for a reasonable amount--then of course David Lee is an option to move.

An option to move at what point? The 13 pick will only be on the table for the next 2weeks. Not in case we end up liking who they pick and try and swing a deal post draft.
Port can draft a player then trade his draft rights before signing him. Happens all the time.

At what point does Lee decide whether or not he signs a reasonable deal with us is what I'm getting at. What if Portland wants someone like Lee at the start of their season but Lee rather negotiate later?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407
6/9/2008  2:43 PM
David Lee is the sacred cow on this forum, don't you know that?
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/9/2008  3:11 PM
Posted by djsunyc:

i would offer a 2027 lottery protected #1 w/ even heavier protection in 2042.

how in the blue hell is this helping portland in any way shape or form?

I think when you are looking to swap--you dont start by putting your best foot forward. Who Knows if cap space and a future 1 would suffice--not likely but you dont start out with your top offer--you want to enter into a negotiation and that package would get you to talk.

RIP Crushalot😞
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
6/9/2008  3:41 PM
Malik, Q, Balkman for Lafrentz, Blake, and the 13?
~You can't run from who you are.~
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/9/2008  4:53 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

Malik Rose Mardy Collins and a 2012 lottery protected 1 for Jarret Jack Joel Pryzbila and pick 13

Cool, another low ball offer. That pretty much proves you're more interested in screwing the other team in trade proposals than making reasonable offers.

Why would you want the 13th pick anyway? The only pick that matters is the 6th. Anything worse than that just won't do, especially a pick that close to 16, which you think is the most useless pick in the entire draft. I'm sure your answer will be that the draft is 13 players deep. How convenient.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/9/2008  5:14 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by BRIGGS:

Malik Rose Mardy Collins and a 2012 lottery protected 1 for Jarret Jack Joel Pryzbila and pick 13

Cool, another low ball offer. That pretty much proves you're more interested in screwing the other team in trade proposals than making reasonable offers.

Why would you want the 13th pick anyway? The only pick that matters is the 6th. Anything worse than that just won't do, especially a pick that close to 16, which you think is the most useless pick in the entire draft. I'm sure your answer will be that the draft is 13 players deep. How convenient.

My bet is 90% of fans would agree with me that they want to take pick 6 in this very nice draft and since Ive said it like 10 times you already know I said the draft was roughly 13 deep. Imagine trading Zach Randolph and lets say OJ Mayo to Philadelphia and we end up with no cap space in 2010 reggie evans and robin lopez chief. And who in their right mind puts their best foot forward in an offer? The same type of scker wiling to give up a 6 pick for nothing.

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 06-09-2008 5:17 PM]
RIP Crushalot😞
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/9/2008  5:19 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by BRIGGS:

Malik Rose Mardy Collins and a 2012 lottery protected 1 for Jarret Jack Joel Pryzbila and pick 13

Cool, another low ball offer. That pretty much proves you're more interested in screwing the other team in trade proposals than making reasonable offers.

Why would you want the 13th pick anyway? The only pick that matters is the 6th. Anything worse than that just won't do, especially a pick that close to 16, which you think is the most useless pick in the entire draft. I'm sure your answer will be that the draft is 13 players deep. How convenient.

My bet is 90% of fans would agree with me that they want to take pick 6 in this very nice draft and since Ive said it like 10 times you already know I said the draft was roughly 13 deep. Imagine trading Zach Randolph and lets say OJ Mayo to Philadelphia and we end up with no cap space in 2010 reggie evans and robin lopez chief.

Mock it out. Let's see that big drop off at 13.

Mayo isn't getting to the 6th pick. And if it makes you feel better we can make that trade when we're on the clock and know exactly who's available. If we get rid of Randolph's albatross contract, why wouldn't they have cap space in 2010?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172
6/9/2008  5:30 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by BRIGGS:

Malik Rose Mardy Collins and a 2012 lottery protected 1 for Jarret Jack Joel Pryzbila and pick 13

Cool, another low ball offer. That pretty much proves you're more interested in screwing the other team in trade proposals than making reasonable offers.

Why would you want the 13th pick anyway? The only pick that matters is the 6th. Anything worse than that just won't do, especially a pick that close to 16, which you think is the most useless pick in the entire draft. I'm sure your answer will be that the draft is 13 players deep. How convenient.

My bet is 90% of fans would agree with me that they want to take pick 6 in this very nice draft and since Ive said it like 10 times you already know I said the draft was roughly 13 deep. Imagine trading Zach Randolph and lets say OJ Mayo to Philadelphia and we end up with no cap space in 2010 reggie evans and robin lopez chief.

Mock it out. Let's see that big drop off at 13.

Mayo isn't getting to the 6th pick. And if it makes you feel better we can make that trade when we're on the clock and know exactly who's available. If we get rid of Randolph's albatross contract, why wouldn't they have cap space in 2010?


Because he's looking at everything remaining the same afterwards, with exception to possibly extending Lee and Nate for pennies. I like the notion we should wait until Zach's deal is closer to being and expiring and unload it along with other contracts that we don't want but if want to unload Zach now then all other transactions come to a screeching halt.

Did you catch in the other thread the fact he included Javale Mcgee in must have of players to choose from but Mcgee is mocked on most drafts pick 16 and below?

Briggs=Exposed!

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 06-09-2008 4:37 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
6/9/2008  5:41 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by BRIGGS:

Malik Rose Mardy Collins and a 2012 lottery protected 1 for Jarret Jack Joel Pryzbila and pick 13

Cool, another low ball offer. That pretty much proves you're more interested in screwing the other team in trade proposals than making reasonable offers.

Why would you want the 13th pick anyway? The only pick that matters is the 6th. Anything worse than that just won't do, especially a pick that close to 16, which you think is the most useless pick in the entire draft. I'm sure your answer will be that the draft is 13 players deep. How convenient.

My bet is 90% of fans would agree with me that they want to take pick 6 in this very nice draft and since Ive said it like 10 times you already know I said the draft was roughly 13 deep. Imagine trading Zach Randolph and lets say OJ Mayo to Philadelphia and we end up with no cap space in 2010 reggie evans and robin lopez chief.

Mock it out. Let's see that big drop off at 13.

Mayo isn't getting to the 6th pick. And if it makes you feel better we can make that trade when we're on the clock and know exactly who's available. If we get rid of Randolph's albatross contract, why wouldn't they have cap space in 2010?


Because he's looking at everything remaining the same afterwards, with exception to possibly extending Lee and Nate for pennies. I like the notion we should wait until Zach's deal is closer and unload along with other contracts that we don't want but if want to unload Zach now then all other transactions come to a screeching halt.

Did you catch in the other thread the fact he included Javale Mcgee in must have of players to choose from but Mcgee is mocked on most drafts pick 16 and below.

Briggs=Exposed!

Briggs is also big on Alexander but in the NBA.com consensus mocks, he goes 14th.

This is why I want him to mock the first 20 picks. He's so sure that by the 16th pick it will be impossible to get a good player but some of the players that he would look at with the 6th pick are expected to go much later. People want to make a big deal out of dropping 10 spots but the fact is that you're still looking at players within the same talent tier.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
What package could we give Portland for pick #13?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy