[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

It's the teams that play Great Defense that always win the titles
Author Thread
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/20/2008  2:47 PM
There, that's better.

Duncan's Spurs, Wade and Shaq's Heat, Billup's Pistons, Jordan's Bulls, Hakeem's Rockets...

Superstar or not, if you don't play great team defense you have no chance at a title.

That eliminates any team that D'Antoni coaches because he and his teams are only concerned with outscoring a team and not about playing defense and making stops when you need them. Of course, by then it's too late.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/20/2008  2:51 PM
you coulda posted this on the other thread, no?

http://ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=26853
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/20/2008  2:52 PM
sure.. why dont you revive this thread when we have a championship caliber roster, are winning 55 and 60 games a year but losing in the ECF finals year after year under Mike D.

Sound good?
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
5/20/2008  2:54 PM
"...only concerned with outscoring a team?" I think that's everyones' goal in the NBA.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/20/2008  2:58 PM
Shaq and Kobe's Laker's were average defensive teams. Also MJ's Bulls were not great either. MJ and Pippen were excellent defenders. Rodman was a great rebounder but they never had a great interior defense. Those teams could get stops, but were not going to be you with defense for 48 minutes like the Knicks, Spurs, Rockets, etc of the era were built to do.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
5/20/2008  3:00 PM
The Showtime Lakers were a very good defensive team too. The only "bad" defender in the starting lineup was Magic.
-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/20/2008  3:00 PM
also every anti Mike D poster still doesnt address this question:

You have Nash, Amare, Q, Marion, etc what kind of system do YOU put in place to win the most games?

Sorry.. Mike D did a great job coaching that team. Two of the NBA's best GMs have hired him.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/20/2008  3:10 PM
Posted by fishmike:

sure.. why dont you revive this thread when we have a championship caliber roster, are winning 55 and 60 games a year but losing in the ECF finals year after year under Mike D.

Sound good?

Actually, being a pretender that loses year after year doesn't sound very good to me.

I'm not sure why that would sound good to anybody.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/20/2008  3:12 PM
Posted by islesfan:

There, that's better.

Duncan's Spurs, Wade and Shaq's Heat, Billup's Pistons, Jordan's Bulls, Hakeem's Rockets...

Superstar or not, if you don't play great team defense you have no chance at a title.

That eliminates any team that D'Antoni coaches because he and his teams are only concerned with outscoring a team and not about playing defense and making stops when you need them. Of course, by then it's too late.

Man if Tim Thomas wouldn't have hit that three how much of a flop would D'Antoni be?
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/20/2008  3:12 PM
Posted by fishmike:

also every anti Mike D poster still doesnt address this question:

You have Nash, Amare, Q, Marion, etc what kind of system do YOU put in place to win the most games?

Sorry.. Mike D did a great job coaching that team. Two of the NBA's best GMs have hired him.

That's easy. I would have let Nash run but I would have demanded and put more of an emphasis on defense.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/20/2008  3:19 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by fishmike:

also every anti Mike D poster still doesnt address this question:

You have Nash, Amare, Q, Marion, etc what kind of system do YOU put in place to win the most games?

Sorry.. Mike D did a great job coaching that team. Two of the NBA's best GMs have hired him.

That's easy. I would have let Nash run but I would have demanded and put more of an emphasis on defense.

Can you answer this question for me now:

Why didn't D'Antoni put more of an emphasis on defense or look to acquire better defensive players, despite having had several seasons to have done so but never did?

Why did the Suns lack of defense continue to be the reason for their demise season after season?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/20/2008  3:20 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:

Man if Tim Thomas wouldn't have hit that three how much of a flop would D'Antoni be?

that's sorta like saying how much of a flop would JVG have been in NY if Allan Houston doesn't make the big shot vs. the Heat in '99, isn't it? bottomline, a coach's job is to prepare his team to be in a position to win games every night... after that it's up to the players to execute... there's more than a few NBA championship winning coaches who can trace back some big shots made by guys that has swung an entire series in their favor... ask Phil Jax how big that shot made by John Paxson was to the Bulls that year, or how huge Michael Jordan's shots have been to his coaching success over the years... how big was Robert Horry's big 3's to the championship winning Spurs & Lakers when he played for them? how big was Sam Cassell to the Rockets when they beat us in '94? u could go on & on w/this... it's silly to make such analogies when judging the quality of a coach.

After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/20/2008  3:26 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by TrueBlue:

Man if Tim Thomas wouldn't have hit that three how much of a flop would D'Antoni be?

that's sorta like saying how much of a flop would JVG have been in NY if Allan Houston doesn't make the big shot vs. the Heat in '99, isn't it? bottomline, a coach's job is to prepare his team to be in a position to win games every night... after that it's up to the players to execute... there's more than a few NBA championship winning coaches who can trace back some big shots made by guys that has swung an entire series in their favor... ask Phil Jax how big that shot made by John Paxson was to the Bulls that year, or how huge Michael Jordan's shots have been to his coaching success over the years... how big was Robert Horry's big 3's to the championship winning Spurs & Lakers when he played for them? how big was Sam Cassell to the Rockets when they beat us in '94? u could go on & on w/this... it's silly to make such analogies when judging the quality of a coach.


No it's not sorta like saying that because of how they got to that point. If you look back at that series they played an inexperienced Laker team Sans Kobe and Phil and let Kwame and Smush Parker of all players beast on them. Kobe imploded in Game 7 but if he would of had his head on straight like he does now they would have got bounced in the first round.


[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-20-2008 2:28 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
eViL
Posts: 25412
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/21/2004
Member: #561
USA
5/20/2008  3:27 PM
Posted by islesfan:

Can you answer this question for me now:

Why didn't D'Antoni put more of an emphasis on defense or look to acquire better defensive players, despite having had several seasons to have done so but never did?

Why did the Suns lack of defense continue to be the reason for their demise season after season?

Defensive pick ups always work (see: Chicago Bulls, Ben Wallace)
check out my latest hip hop project: https://soundcloud.com/michaelcro http://youtu.be/scNXshrpyZo
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

5/20/2008  3:30 PM
Posted by eViL:
Posted by islesfan:

Can you answer this question for me now:

Why didn't D'Antoni put more of an emphasis on defense or look to acquire better defensive players, despite having had several seasons to have done so but never did?

Why did the Suns lack of defense continue to be the reason for their demise season after season?

Defensive pick ups always work (see: Chicago Bulls, Ben Wallace)

See Boston Celtics Kevin Garnett
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/20/2008  3:30 PM
Posted by eViL:
Posted by islesfan:

Can you answer this question for me now:

Why didn't D'Antoni put more of an emphasis on defense or look to acquire better defensive players, despite having had several seasons to have done so but never did?

Why did the Suns lack of defense continue to be the reason for their demise season after season?

Defensive pick ups always work (see: Chicago Bulls, Ben Wallace)

Asking 1 guy to play defense for the entire team is doomed for failure.

Getting your entire team to play good defense has a greater rate of success.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
5/20/2008  3:34 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by TrueBlue:

Man if Tim Thomas wouldn't have hit that three how much of a flop would D'Antoni be?

that's sorta like saying how much of a flop would JVG have been in NY if Allan Houston doesn't make the big shot vs. the Heat in '99, isn't it? bottomline, a coach's job is to prepare his team to be in a position to win games every night... after that it's up to the players to execute... there's more than a few NBA championship winning coaches who can trace back some big shots made by guys that has swung an entire series in their favor... ask Phil Jax how big that shot made by John Paxson was to the Bulls that year, or how huge Michael Jordan's shots have been to his coaching success over the years... how big was Robert Horry's big 3's to the championship winning Spurs & Lakers when he played for them? how big was Sam Cassell to the Rockets when they beat us in '94? u could go on & on w/this... it's silly to make such analogies when judging the quality of a coach.


No it's not sorta like saying that because of how they got to that point. If you look back at that series they played an inexperienced Laker team Sans Kobe and Phil and let Kwame and Smush Parker of all players beast on them. Kobe imploded in Game 7 but if he would of had his head on straight like he does now they would have got bounced in the first round.


[Edited by - TrueBlue on 05-20-2008 2:28 PM]

if Allan Houston doesn't make that shot the Knicks get bounced in the first round too... i fail to see a big difference there... bottomline is it's not the coach's job to make the shots on the floor, it's up to the players to do that... Kobe imploding doesn't reflect on Phil Jackson anymore than if he'd have stepped up & won game 7 for them does... you can try to find reasons to justify your argument til you're blue in the face but players executing on the floor is what it all boils down to.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
5/20/2008  3:34 PM
Posted by TrueBlue:
Posted by eViL:
Posted by islesfan:

Can you answer this question for me now:

Why didn't D'Antoni put more of an emphasis on defense or look to acquire better defensive players, despite having had several seasons to have done so but never did?

Why did the Suns lack of defense continue to be the reason for their demise season after season?

Defensive pick ups always work (see: Chicago Bulls, Ben Wallace)

See Boston Celtics Kevin Garnett

KG helped obviously but bringing in Tom Thibodeau to implement a team wide defensive philosophy was a bigger reason for their turnaround.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
5/20/2008  3:35 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by fishmike:

also every anti Mike D poster still doesnt address this question:

You have Nash, Amare, Q, Marion, etc what kind of system do YOU put in place to win the most games?

Sorry.. Mike D did a great job coaching that team. Two of the NBA's best GMs have hired him.

That's easy. I would have let Nash run but I would have demanded and put more of an emphasis on defense.

Can you answer this question for me now:

Why didn't D'Antoni put more of an emphasis on defense or look to acquire better defensive players, despite having had several seasons to have done so but never did?

Why did the Suns lack of defense continue to be the reason for their demise season after season?
actually.. thats EXACTLY what he did. Mike's two moves as interim GM were he extended Diaw and signed Marcus Banks to the full MLE. That didnt turn out to be a very good move but he recognized the team's need to improve defense and went out and got Banks. Kurt Thomas as well. Those are facts. Saying Mike D didnt tell his team to defend is speculation.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Uptown
Posts: 31378
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 4/1/2008
Member: #1883

5/20/2008  3:35 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by fishmike:

sure.. why dont you revive this thread when we have a championship caliber roster, are winning 55 and 60 games a year but losing in the ECF finals year after year under Mike D.

Sound good?

Actually, being a pretender that loses year after year doesn't sound very good to me.

I'm not sure why that would sound good to anybody.


Define loses? Do you mean any team that walk away with the 'Chip' in june is a pretender?
It's the teams that play Great Defense that always win the titles

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy