[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

I call on Nate's resignation!
Author Thread
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
3/10/2008  10:51 PM
35 minutes and he scores only 5 fugin points?!

What a phony!!!

Okay, where are all of the big shots who where calling him a great benefit to our offense and how he and a 'FLOOR GENERAL' () would be running the offense? Come on out of your corner and come get some!!!
I'll never trust this' team again.
AUTOADVERT
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/10/2008  10:55 PM
Be fair, I don't think anybody really said that. Although some people took a little too much out of the last game.

The title of this thread should have been:

Nate 'The Grrrrr-8' Sucked it tonight
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
3/10/2008  10:57 PM
Actually, people did' say that. I know what I heard (saw). I wonder what little bitty Nate has to say bout it?

'Come out, come out wherever you are'!!!!!!!!!
I'll never trust this' team again.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
3/10/2008  11:11 PM
Keep Nate and have him remain part of our core. Of course he's not a 45 pt scorer, but he's not a 5 pt scorer either. He's still a good player though.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/10/2008  11:12 PM
or maybe the guy was tired after scoring 45 the other night & playing like a wildman through 5 quarters of basketball?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/10/2008  11:12 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:

Keep Nate and have him remain part of our core. Of course he's not a 45 pt scorer, but he's not a 5 pt scorer either. He's still a good player though.

there is no room for that type of objectivity on this forum... shame on you!
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TrueBlue
Posts: 29144
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 9/20/2006
Member: #1172

3/10/2008  11:18 PM
Posted by islesfan:

Be fair, I don't think anybody really said that. Although some people took a little too much out of the last game.

The title of this thread should have been:

Nate 'The Grrrrr-8' Sucked it tonight

He sure did and those who opposed of all the love past couple days did so because we knew he has a ton of sideshow remaining in his game. I'm not mad at Nate for shooting 2-13fg only scoring 5 pts, I'm mad at Nate because he played 33min, only dished out 2ast, 1 via accidental offense, and only had 2reb. Like I said if the ball isn't in his hands with freedom to chuck at any given moment, he does very little next to nothing anywhere else.

[Edited by - TrueBlue on 03-10-2008 10:19 PM]
LMFAO @ the Bio [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephon_Marbury[/url]
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/10/2008  11:20 PM
Posted by TMS:

or maybe the guy was tired after scoring 45 the other night & playing like a wildman through 5 quarters of basketball?

Or maybe as Allanfan said, he's not that 45 points good and he's not 5 points bad. He's a role player, best coming off the bench where he can match up against other backups.

Seriously, why make excuses or try to make him out to be more than he is?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/10/2008  11:28 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

or maybe the guy was tired after scoring 45 the other night & playing like a wildman through 5 quarters of basketball?

Or maybe as Allanfan said, he's not that 45 points good and he's not 5 points bad. He's a role player, best coming off the bench where he can match up against other backups.

Seriously, why make excuses or try to make him out to be more than he is?

isles, can u point out where i made Nate out to be more than what he is? i'm curious where some of you get these phantom quotes of mine.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/10/2008  11:33 PM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

or maybe the guy was tired after scoring 45 the other night & playing like a wildman through 5 quarters of basketball?

Or maybe as Allanfan said, he's not that 45 points good and he's not 5 points bad. He's a role player, best coming off the bench where he can match up against other backups.

Seriously, why make excuses or try to make him out to be more than he is?

isles, can u point out where i made Nate out to be more than what he is? i'm curious where some of you get these phantom quotes of mine.

Why are you making lame excuses for Nate? He's tired from playing 2 days ago?
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/10/2008  11:38 PM
Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/10/2008  11:45 PM
Posted by TMS:

Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.

And we'd expect some of you to know that Nate blowing up for 45 is very much the exception and should not be taken out of proportion. Support is fine. Suggesting that Nate should be a starter, that people need to be traded to make room for him, that you can expect big things from Nate, that all they need is the right backcourt mate to complement Nate and you're set, is just plain stupid.

It works both ways. I'd expect you to understand that.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
3/10/2008  11:45 PM
I guess calling him a scoring role player. Saying he is like Bobby Jackson who came off the bench for the Kings behind Bibby to provide offense & energy was to much praise. Or comparing him with Chris Childs who came off the bench for Ward was to much praise aswell. What was I thinking asking for a floor general to take PG duties away fron Nate so that he wouldn't have to run an offense. Instead just do what he does best, putting him in a role to succeed in.

This game proves that Nate can't carry the Knicks on his back offensivly for 82games consistantly. Taking only 5 shots in a blowout loss that was over by halftime. You guys are right he sucks.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
3/10/2008  11:45 PM
Nate is a phenominal player for his size. He would be dominating in a little man league. The mike jordan of 6 foot and under.

But in the NBA' he's too damn short and we never should of drafted him. No excuses, sorry. This is the NBA and you NEVER' draft a guy who's under six foot. He's way over hyped, too mouthy and only brings a show. Not the way to win games. It just isn't. I will continue my disgust of isiah and the over hyped and over paid players he's brought to us. This team is a disaster and it's staring all of you right in the face.

As far as I'm concerned this is the team to keep and put on the floor for the rest of the year:
Lee
Balkman
Morris
Chandler
Collins
and Crawford (at least he scores consistently)

I'm sorry, but the rest of this team is a huge mismatch. Never should have done it.
I'll never trust this' team again.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30259
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
3/10/2008  11:49 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.

And we'd expect some of you to know that Nate blowing up for 45 is very much the exception and should not be taken out of proportion. Support is fine. Suggesting that Nate should be a starter, that people need to be traded to make room for him, that you can expect big things from Nate, that all they need is the right backcourt mate to complement Nate and you're set, is just plain stupid.

It works both ways. I'd expect you to understand that.

Is it safe to say that Nate in his prime has the potential to be cappable of averaging 14-15pts 3rebs, 3assist, 1stl per game off the bench in 28mins per game? Or is that to lofty??
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/10/2008  11:53 PM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.

And we'd expect some of you to know that Nate blowing up for 45 is very much the exception and should not be taken out of proportion. Support is fine. Suggesting that Nate should be a starter, that people need to be traded to make room for him, that you can expect big things from Nate, that all they need is the right backcourt mate to complement Nate and you're set, is just plain stupid.

It works both ways. I'd expect you to understand that.

isles, don't lump me in with anyone else... i made very fair comments when it came to Nate's game... feel free to go through the thread again & find where i was going lolly goo goo over it... it didn't happen.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/11/2008  12:04 AM
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.

And we'd expect some of you to know that Nate blowing up for 45 is very much the exception and should not be taken out of proportion. Support is fine. Suggesting that Nate should be a starter, that people need to be traded to make room for him, that you can expect big things from Nate, that all they need is the right backcourt mate to complement Nate and you're set, is just plain stupid.

It works both ways. I'd expect you to understand that.

Is it safe to say that Nate in his prime has the potential to be cappable of averaging 14-15pts 3rebs, 3assist, 1stl per game off the bench in 28mins per game? Or is that to lofty??

14-15 pts is very lofty. 10pts, 3 rebs, 3 asts, 1 stl and 5 dimes in 20-25 minutes a game off the bench would be more than can be expected.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
3/11/2008  12:05 AM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.

And we'd expect some of you to know that Nate blowing up for 45 is very much the exception and should not be taken out of proportion. Support is fine. Suggesting that Nate should be a starter, that people need to be traded to make room for him, that you can expect big things from Nate, that all they need is the right backcourt mate to complement Nate and you're set, is just plain stupid.

It works both ways. I'd expect you to understand that.

isles, don't lump me in with anyone else... i made very fair comments when it came to Nate's game... feel free to go through the thread again & find where i was going lolly goo goo over it... it didn't happen.

And you didn't say **** to the people who were over the top, the way you seem hell bent on saying things to people who had the audacity to say that Marcus Williams "wasn't bad".

That's the point. That's the double standard.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/11/2008  12:14 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.

And we'd expect some of you to know that Nate blowing up for 45 is very much the exception and should not be taken out of proportion. Support is fine. Suggesting that Nate should be a starter, that people need to be traded to make room for him, that you can expect big things from Nate, that all they need is the right backcourt mate to complement Nate and you're set, is just plain stupid.

It works both ways. I'd expect you to understand that.

isles, don't lump me in with anyone else... i made very fair comments when it came to Nate's game... feel free to go through the thread again & find where i was going lolly goo goo over it... it didn't happen.

And you didn't say **** to the people who were over the top, the way you seem hell bent on saying things to people who had the audacity to say that Marcus Williams "wasn't bad".

That's the point. That's the double standard.

wow dude, are u really that obtuse to derive that definition from what i've been saying? i AGREED WITH YOU about Marcus' game... did u catch that? once again, I AGREED WITH YOU! i AGREED that he showed some promise to become a viable starter some day, but that we should temper our excitement over just a short sample... i also clearly said people needed to temper their excitement about Nate's performance in that thread the other day... go back & read the thread again & stop deriving your own definitions behind my intentions.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/11/2008  12:16 AM
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by newyorknewyork:
Posted by islesfan:
Posted by TMS:

Christ, i made a suggestion... who the fukk knows why Nate's having a bad game?... maybe his fukkin jock in on too tight... maybe his shot wasn't falling... it happens... i'd expect all you basketball experts around here to have watched enough basketball to know that Nate's more than just a 5 pt per game player... i swear to God all the nimrods around here who jump down the throat of anyone who makes any minute reference or comment in support of any of our players is making this place a fukkin' troll's den.

And we'd expect some of you to know that Nate blowing up for 45 is very much the exception and should not be taken out of proportion. Support is fine. Suggesting that Nate should be a starter, that people need to be traded to make room for him, that you can expect big things from Nate, that all they need is the right backcourt mate to complement Nate and you're set, is just plain stupid.

It works both ways. I'd expect you to understand that.

Is it safe to say that Nate in his prime has the potential to be cappable of averaging 14-15pts 3rebs, 3assist, 1stl per game off the bench in 28mins per game? Or is that to lofty??

14-15 pts is very lofty. 10pts, 3 rebs, 3 asts, 1 stl and 5 dimes in 20-25 minutes a game off the bench would be more than can be expected.

Nate's putting up 13 & 3 this year in 25 mpg... i guess he's already exceeded your expectations... maybe he needs to collect more dimes to meet them tho... Marbs should school him on how to do it.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
I call on Nate's resignation!

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy