[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Pick Your Knick
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
Bonn1997
Posts: 38654
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
If you were the GM of a new expansion team and could pick one Knick to put on your roster, who would you pick? Pretend they all have equal salaries.
David Lee
Zach Randolph
Eddy Curry
Stephon Marburry
Jamal Crawford
Nate Robinson
Renaldo Balkman
Malik Rose
View Results


Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
3/1/2008  2:48 PM
I choose David Lee, He is the best thing going on for the KNicks.
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/1/2008  2:51 PM
Posted by Vmart:

I choose David Lee, He is the best thing going on for the KNicks.

He's probably the only Knick I'd really want. I'd be willing to take the other guys on rookie salaries because that's a low gamble, though.
knicksbabyyeah
Posts: 21472
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/19/2001
Member: #100
Netherlands
3/1/2008  2:53 PM
David Lee will fit on your team regardless of the other players

Marbury is toast, the others depend on who else you've got so they're more situational
Cash
Posts: 20431
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 2/22/2007
Member: #1319
USA
3/1/2008  3:54 PM
I put Lee, but I could see myself changing my mind next year and choosing robinson. Robinson's game would be helped a lot by playing with someone other than crawford. At least Marbury would drive and dish out, which would set up nate for some open shots. Jamal just passes the ball when he has to, and takes up a lot of shots.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
3/1/2008  4:54 PM
Lee. The only true bright spot in this whole organization.

All around good guy, non controversial. Can play basketball very well and should be starting every game and given major minutes. He's probably the only reason I'm sticking around.
I'll never trust this' team again.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/1/2008  5:31 PM
Posted by knicksbabyyeah:

David Lee will fit on your team regardless of the other players

Marbury is toast, the others depend on who else you've got so they're more situational

agree word for word.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/1/2008  6:41 PM
Who voted for Jamal?
joec32033
Posts: 30632
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
3/1/2008  7:11 PM
I voted Lee
~You can't run from who you are.~
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
3/1/2008  8:03 PM
Lee.

Jamal if i had another pick.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
sbensol74
Posts: 20331
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/12/2004
Member: #795
USA
3/1/2008  8:09 PM
I voted for Jamal. If I was starting a team that had no fan base I would want a guy who can create some excitement for the first few years. I'm sure there are much better players who can do that, but I'm forced to pick from our miz squad.
clydesofly.com
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
3/1/2008  8:21 PM
NONE OF THE ABOVE! no one on this team you can consider as a franchise player
The Future. GO KNICKS!
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
3/1/2008  8:32 PM
Posted by WOODMANnYk:

NONE OF THE ABOVE! no one on this team you can consider as a franchise player

Where did you read that? Relax, they wouldn't pick a Knick til the 12th round.
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/1/2008  9:23 PM
Posted by WOODMANnYk:

NONE OF THE ABOVE! no one on this team you can consider as a franchise player

You wouldn't take David Lee for free???
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
3/1/2008  10:05 PM
I cannot believe everyone is taking Lee if he is getting the same absurd salary as Crawford and Randolph.

Lee' s appeal has a lot to do with the fact that he is a value when equating contribution to salary...

Now, I too believe that Randolph has a lot to learn about playing TEAM basketball in the year 2008 but...
If LEE and Randoph had the same salary; you would have to be insane to take Lee!

Who here would not take Randolph at 2 million a year???
This poll is ridiculous --- there is not an honest man amongst you.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/2/2008  7:11 AM
Posted by colorfl1:

I cannot believe everyone is taking Lee if he is getting the same absurd salary as Crawford and Randolph.

Lee' s appeal has a lot to do with the fact that he is a value when equating contribution to salary...

Now, I too believe that Randolph has a lot to learn about playing TEAM basketball in the year 2008 but...
If LEE and Randoph had the same salary; you would have to be insane to take Lee!

Who here would not take Randolph at 2 million a year???
This poll is ridiculous --- there is not an honest man amongst you.
What are the *reasons* why you would take fat Zach over Lee? All you've done is attack those who would take Lee without giving one reason why you wouldn't.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
3/2/2008  7:16 AM
i can't believe someone actually picked Malik Rose over D Lee... come on, stop being retarded people.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/2/2008  8:06 AM
Posted by TMS:

i can't believe someone actually picked Malik Rose over D Lee... come on, stop being retarded people.

Malik is threatening to make the all-star team
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
3/2/2008  9:12 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by colorfl1:

I cannot believe everyone is taking Lee if he is getting the same absurd salary as Crawford and Randolph.

Lee' s appeal has a lot to do with the fact that he is a value when equating contribution to salary...

Now, I too believe that Randolph has a lot to learn about playing TEAM basketball in the year 2008 but...
If LEE and Randoph had the same salary; you would have to be insane to take Lee!

Who here would not take Randolph at 2 million a year???
This poll is ridiculous --- there is not an honest man amongst you.
What are the *reasons* why you would take fat Zach over Lee? All you've done is attack those who would take Lee without giving one reason why you wouldn't.

I love what Lee brings to each game, lots of hustle and heart...
but people are drinking way to much hateraide when it concerns Zach.
Randolph has a great knack for rebounding and is a talented passer (when he chooses to pass), and unlike Lee, Zach brings an elite offensive arsenal,

Now, Zach's in an immensely immature player,,, hence the ball hogging,,, but when he is surrounded with a reliable environment, his game demeanor changes for the better.
The reason why the league wants nothing to do with him is because his contract is an albatross... he is insanely overpaid...

But if you take salaries out of the equation...
meaning Lee is no longer the bargain he is now salary-wise, and Zach's salary is more manageable..,

Once salary is negated from the equation; all the "experts" on this board would have to admit that Zach has far more skills than Lee, and is more likely to become a perennial all-star.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
3/2/2008  10:48 AM
Posted by colorfl1:
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by colorfl1:

I cannot believe everyone is taking Lee if he is getting the same absurd salary as Crawford and Randolph.

Lee' s appeal has a lot to do with the fact that he is a value when equating contribution to salary...

Now, I too believe that Randolph has a lot to learn about playing TEAM basketball in the year 2008 but...
If LEE and Randoph had the same salary; you would have to be insane to take Lee!

Who here would not take Randolph at 2 million a year???
This poll is ridiculous --- there is not an honest man amongst you.
What are the *reasons* why you would take fat Zach over Lee? All you've done is attack those who would take Lee without giving one reason why you wouldn't.

I love what Lee brings to each game, lots of hustle and heart...
but people are drinking way to much hateraide when it concerns Zach.
Randolph has a great knack for rebounding and is a talented passer (when he chooses to pass), and unlike Lee, Zach brings an elite offensive arsenal,

Now, Zach's in an immensely immature player,,, hence the ball hogging,,, but when he is surrounded with a reliable environment, his game demeanor changes for the better.
The reason why the league wants nothing to do with him is because his contract is an albatross... he is insanely overpaid...

But if you take salaries out of the equation...
meaning Lee is no longer the bargain he is now salary-wise, and Zach's salary is more manageable..,

Once salary is negated from the equation; all the "experts" on this board would have to admit that Zach has far more skills than Lee, and is more likely to become a perennial all-star.
Zach is not a better rebounder than Lee and he's a better passer than Lee only if you ignore turnovers.
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215
3/2/2008  10:55 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by colorfl1:

I cannot believe everyone is taking Lee if he is getting the same absurd salary as Crawford and Randolph.

Lee' s appeal has a lot to do with the fact that he is a value when equating contribution to salary...

Now, I too believe that Randolph has a lot to learn about playing TEAM basketball in the year 2008 but...
If LEE and Randoph had the same salary; you would have to be insane to take Lee!

Who here would not take Randolph at 2 million a year???
This poll is ridiculous --- there is not an honest man amongst you.
What are the *reasons* why you would take fat Zach over Lee? All you've done is attack those who would take Lee without giving one reason why you wouldn't.

Easy Randolph is a better scorer, REBOUNDER (if disagree look at their career stats), and just all-around player period. If everything being equal in terms of salary and people would seriously even think about taking Lee over Randolph just shows how much basketballl 101 has gone out the door.

This board has just become a popularity contest its almost set in stone on whose to always be criticized and whose to always be praised.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Pick Your Knick
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy