[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

It seems like the only way for this Knicks to win anymore games is for..............................
Author Thread
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
1/18/2008  5:45 PM

Jamal to be the first option, Zach being the second option, and Nate being the 3 option. Curry get in where you fit in. This seems like this is the strategy at this point.
BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
AUTOADVERT
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
1/18/2008  5:48 PM
I pretty agree, although I think the 3rd option would Curry instead of Nate. But yes, thats it. The rest of the players should just play hard.
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  5:49 PM
Yeah, and in that, Jamal has to be on fire for us to have a chance, something he has clearly struggled to do over his now 8 year career.

So we're doomed to be a sub .500 team if we're making Crawful our Franchise Player - something Isiah has done.

Crawful is what he is. Unfortunately Isiah gives him the responsibilities and freedom you would give a franchise player, a Kobe Bryant or a Michael Jordan.

Until a coach treats Jamal for what he is and demands he plays under control and limits his responsibilities and freedom on the court - we're never going to be a good team.

Don't let 3 wins and a decent week by Jamal trick you into thinking some miraculous formula for an inevitable turnaround has been found. It hasn't. He has done this before. This Knick team has strung a few wins together before. It does not change the big picture one bit. When it reverses itself you will see that - yet again.



http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  5:50 PM
I will add on about Zach though. We're a far better team when he takes ~9 FGAs versus 15+FGAs. That's a given.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  5:54 PM
More about Jamal (yeah, Im a little flaky tonight, could have given 1 response, sorry lol....)

Last five games?

3PT FGAs?

7, 7, 7, 10, 10

Now, out of the blue he has hit 66% of them - but if anyone thinks THAT will continue well I feel sorry for them constantly getting caught up in the "Well, he shot well last night so THATS IT he will do that and better for the rest of his life!!! He's turned the corner!!! He will never mess up ever again!!!!" trap time and again.

He's been so shot happy it's disturbing. Again, it's gone in, and it's been a big part of winning the past 3 games - BUT - how on earth can you expect an 8-year-career 40% shooter (32% 3pt) to continue some out of the blue week of shooting 50%+ from the field?

Come'on fellas...I know it's nice to see the kid finally string together some nice games this year, but lets remember what a big picture looks like: and in that remember that a big picture NEVER mirrors one nice week of one player playing out of his mind.

If ya do, it'll be the same old for ya, he'll go in the tank and have an 18-74FG week, we'll go 1-4, and you guys will be throwing up your arms "Why, what happened! We were so good last week!!!"

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
bitty41
Posts: 22316
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 12/3/2006
Member: #1215

1/18/2008  5:56 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

I will add on about Zach though. We're a far better team when he takes ~9 FGAs versus 15+FGAs. That's a given.

No he should be taking between 12 to 15 shots b/c he's not strictly around the basket scorer so he's going to mix in some jump shots. Like the last game against NJ he went 8-15 which I think is good numbers for him if he can stay in that area. 9 shots is very low for an NBA team' 2nd option IMO
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/18/2008  6:13 PM
Oh boy........ you know grumpy grandpa was going to go in on this thread. LOL

[Edited by - anji on 01-18-2008 6:14 PM]
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  6:16 PM
Posted by Anji:

Oh boy........ you know grumpy grandpa was going to go in on this thread. LOL

[Edited by - anji on 01-18-2008 6:14 PM]

Oh get off my case.......... and if you're going to be on it try bringing statistics to a debate to show my why Crawford is such an amazing player, a winner, a champion to be, etc....instead of just looking to insult.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  6:18 PM
Posted by bitty41:
Posted by Cosmic:

I will add on about Zach though. We're a far better team when he takes ~9 FGAs versus 15+FGAs. That's a given.

No he should be taking between 12 to 15 shots b/c he's not strictly around the basket scorer so he's going to mix in some jump shots. Like the last game against NJ he went 8-15 which I think is good numbers for him if he can stay in that area. 9 shots is very low for an NBA team' 2nd option IMO

The thing is that ball dominant players rarely get others involved because they are so busy putting up shots. When they do that, unless they are on fire, you're going to have a tough time to win. Given that most gunners usually aren't all that efficient - if you choose to rely on them heavily as we do - chances are your record won't be all that great over the long haul.

That's the problem I have with Zach or Crawford taking SO many shots. If Zach shot 50% then fine. If Crawford shot 45% or better? Then fine. Yet, they don't.

So you're basically hinging your success on whether or not a gunner is going to be on fire for a game. That's a horrible way to expect to win more games than you lose.
[/quote]



[Edited by - cosmic on 01-18-2008 6:19 PM]
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
BasketballJones
Posts: 31973
Alba Posts: 19
Joined: 7/16/2002
Member: #290
USA
1/18/2008  6:19 PM
Seems like the Knicks can win, so long as Marbury stays home.
https:// It's not so hard.
BigC
Posts: 22672
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/14/2004
Member: #829
1/18/2008  6:19 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

Yeah, and in that, Jamal has to be on fire for us to have a chance, something he has clearly struggled to do over his now 8 year career.

So we're doomed to be a sub .500 team if we're making Crawful our Franchise Player - something Isiah has done.

Crawful is what he is. Unfortunately Isiah gives him the responsibilities and freedom you would give a franchise player, a Kobe Bryant or a Michael Jordan.

Until a coach treats Jamal for what he is and demands he plays under control and limits his responsibilities and freedom on the court - we're never going to be a good team.

Don't let 3 wins and a decent week by Jamal trick you into thinking some miraculous formula for an inevitable turnaround has been found. It hasn't. He has done this before. This Knick team has strung a few wins together before. It does not change the big picture one bit. When it reverses itself you will see that - yet again.

You know I have always said if you see Jamal start his numbers will go up. I would not be surprised if he finishes with shooting 42% this year or more with 20 to 21 points. Which is what he can do when he starts. I'm not into this give Eddy the ball thing.

The thing is Cosmic you have to go with what you have. Right noe this team does not have a franchise player. So why not go with the guy that gives you the best chance at winning? The Knicks have tried giving the ball through Curry for 2 years it has not worked. Jamal and Zach could work if we had a real coach. Not some guy fighting players with a bag of popcorn and beat up Eyebrows.

If this team gets a good draft pick Jamal will not be a franchise player. I don't even think Isiah thinks he is the franchise player. All that is happening is Marbury is not on the team so the players and coach look at Jamal as a leader. So who would you go with?



BigC's Knick blogs and Knicks highlights after every Knicks game http://fromthebaseline.com/
Queeniepop
Posts: 20640
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/29/2006
Member: #1233

1/18/2008  6:24 PM
Jamal is shooting 42% from the field- his best % of his career

Jamal is shooting 36% from 3-FG - career high

Jamal is averaging nearly 20 pts and 5 assists

Jamal is shooting 87% from FT- best of his career



nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
1/18/2008  6:29 PM
Cosmic, we all know that there is some talent on this team, but that it just hasn't played well together. If they do the things they need to in order to win, why be so skeptical?

It's not about Jamal being hot or not. It's the STYLE of play that matters most. If you have him taking more GOOD shots, due to running Screens, Curls and passing the ball so that he's taking open shots with his feet set, he's gonna be much more consistent. We've been hitting more shots cuz we've been sharing he ball better as a team. That's really all that we needed to do from the get go.

Someone finally got thru to Zach and he's been a little better at sharing the ball. He's still not perfect, but he's been better. We've also moved away from forcing the ball to Curry all game, WHICH I'VE BEEN SCREAMING about all year. Curry will always be a primary threat, but if you never take the open shots he creates by teams being so preoccupied with him then you miss the whole advantage of having him in the paint. Also as i've been saying over and over, we have elusive guards and there's not reason we shouldn't have defenders chasing those guys around screens all game.

Jones is a nice backcourt mate for Jamal cuz he doesn't require shots, but he's a ball mover and he'll hit an open shot from time to time. He also takes the ball strong to the hole and defends.
JesseDark
Posts: 22827
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2003
Member: #467
1/18/2008  6:32 PM
I think you are right Bib C. The light has flashed on. Curry as the last option is formidable.
Bring back dee-fense
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  6:37 PM
Posted by Queeniepop:

Jamal is shooting 42% from the field- his best % of his career

Jamal is shooting 36% from 3-FG - career high

Jamal is averaging nearly 20 pts and 5 assists

Jamal is shooting 87% from FT- best of his career




...and he's still ranked in the bottom third or worse of all NBA guards in most categories.

...and he's led his team to a wonderous 12-26 record.

So it really doesn't matter because those are the percentages you could live with a bench guy getting not a guy who you've put the success of the team on.

My problem with Jamal isn't that he isn't a good player. My problem is that he's given the freedom and responsibility that a good player deserves. He doesn't deserve it but he's given it anyway.


Edit: Dammit, keep screwing up the quotes now...


...



[Edited by - cosmic on 01-18-2008 6:45 PM]
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  6:40 PM
Posted by BigC:




You know I have always said if you see Jamal start his numbers will go up. I would not be surprised if he finishes with shooting 42% this year or more with 20 to 21 points. Which is what he can do when he starts. I'm not into this give Eddy the ball thing.

The thing is Cosmic you have to go with what you have. Right noe this team does not have a franchise player. So why not go with the guy that gives you the best chance at winning? The Knicks have tried giving the ball through Curry for 2 years it has not worked. Jamal and Zach could work if we had a real coach. Not some guy fighting players with a bag of popcorn and beat up Eyebrows.

If this team gets a good draft pick Jamal will not be a franchise player. I don't even think Isiah thinks he is the franchise player. All that is happening is Marbury is not on the team so the players and coach look at Jamal as a leader. So who would you go with?


While I understand the fact we don't have many options here I still don't think that means he should have the #1 responsibility on the team of which he clearly does. You can't allow such an inefficient player to have the #1 role. Whether or not you have other options you still must get such a player under control otherwise you're never going to do well - and even if one day he gets a supporting cast - he will then keep them back with his poor habits.

The only reason why he has looked acceptable the past week or so is because out of no where he's hitting 66% from down town (last five games). However, that will not continue, and when it goes back to his 32%? And he's taking between 7 and 10 of them a game? I don't think I have to tell you what's going to happen....

I am absolutely not on, and never will be on, the Jamal is a Franchise Player - let him chuck away - let him take the most shots - let him be the primary ball handler bandwagon. Unfortunately, this is the role he has had for 3 years now going on 4 and it's no coincidence our record frequently mirrors his shooting percentage.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
1/18/2008  6:44 PM
Posted by nixluva:

Cosmic, we all know that there is some talent on this team, but that it just hasn't played well together. If they do the things they need to in order to win, why be so skeptical?

It's not about Jamal being hot or not. It's the STYLE of play that matters most. If you have him taking more GOOD shots, due to running Screens, Curls and passing the ball so that he's taking open shots with his feet set, he's gonna be much more consistent. We've been hitting more shots cuz we've been sharing he ball better as a team. That's really all that we needed to do from the get go.

Someone finally got thru to Zach and he's been a little better at sharing the ball. He's still not perfect, but he's been better. We've also moved away from forcing the ball to Curry all game, WHICH I'VE BEEN SCREAMING about all year. Curry will always be a primary threat, but if you never take the open shots he creates by teams being so preoccupied with him then you miss the whole advantage of having him in the paint. Also as i've been saying over and over, we have elusive guards and there's not reason we shouldn't have defenders chasing those guys around screens all game.

Jones is a nice backcourt mate for Jamal cuz he doesn't require shots, but he's a ball mover and he'll hit an open shot from time to time. He also takes the ball strong to the hole and defends.

The majority of this team has been together for years and still hasn't gotten it together. Why would they now?

What I am skeptical about is Crawford has one good week, something he has done in the past, the Knicks have one good week, something they have done in the past, and the same people seem to suddenly perk up and believe everything has changed and the corner has been turned and now just sit back and watch the wins roll in. So, yeah, I'm skeptical, because I've seen it before, and then what has happened time and again? Back to earth.. "Knicks" earth.

So, nah, I'm not caught up in the idea of one week's time wiping out a lengthy history of losing.

I'll be caught up in that when they are actually a WINNING TEAM. Not before. Been fooled ENOUGH.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/18/2008  8:01 PM
Cosmic, i'm not sure where you're getting this idea that people are putting Jamal on top of some lofty pedestal all of a sudden... it's OK to acknowledge good play once in a while... it don't mean anyone's under any illusions that Jamal has transformed into some franchise player that's gonna take us to the promise land.

yes, we all know you can't stand Jamal's game... we know you wish he were on a different team... we know that you have no faith in Jamal being a positive on this team going forward... we get it dude.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Anji
Posts: 25523
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 4/14/2006
Member: #1122
USA
1/19/2008  10:07 AM
Posted by Queeniepop:

Jamal is shooting 42% from the field- his best % of his career

Jamal is shooting 36% from 3-FG - career high

Jamal is averaging nearly 20 pts and 5 assists

Jamal is shooting 87% from FT- best of his career
Jamal been doing a really good job this year. He is around that 20 and 5 mark that only a couple of great players like Kobe and Wade do better then. He has his FG% up in the "scorers" range of 41%-43% that alot of the other scoring guards in the league average(probably needs to still get to the basket and line more).

I think it will great if the knicks get a great player at the 1,2,3,4,5. Jamal is the kind of player a great player can lean on and feed off of IMHO.
"Really, all Americans want is a cold beer, warm p***y, and some place to s**t with a door on it." - Mr. Ford
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
1/19/2008  10:10 AM
Can the Knicks atleast go 20-10 in their next 30 games. That would put us back in the mix of things.
It seems like the only way for this Knicks to win anymore games is for..............................

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy