Posted by nysportsfan11:
There is a difference between a franchise player and a superstar. There is only one franchise player in this league today and his name is Tim Duncan. LeBron is close, KG's never been clutch enough to be a franchise player and prefers not to be one anyway. Wade is a superstar but overrated once you try and call him a franchise player and Kobe may well be the best individual player on the planet, but he's not a franchise player. He absolutely has the skill to be one, but lacks the mentality.
Kareem was a franchise player. Russell, Wilt, Jordan, Hakeem, Bird, Magic, Shaq, Isiah and Oscar were franchise players. Duncan is the only one on that level.
completely disagree with you here... IMO being a franchise player doesn't necessarily entail leading one's franchise to a championship, which seems to me is the standard which you're using to define what a franchise player is.
KG is easily a franchise player because he leads & is the best player on his respective team & would be on most others... same goes for Lebron, Nash, Nowitzki, Kobe & some others.
A superstar is any player that puts up bigtime #'s & helps to put fans in the seats, whether he's a leader on his team or not... Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, Vince Carter, T-Mac, Marion... these guys are all superstar players but not necessarily franchise guys.
2 players that are exceptions to the above are Amare & Yao... they are no doubt franchise players but they don't necessarily lead their franchises.
[Edited by - TMS on 01-08-2008 07:29 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.