[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Would you do Marbury for Jermaine O'Neal?
Author Thread
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/26/2007  4:06 PM
Rampant Sam Smith speculation, but an interesting question nonethless:

Latest Marbury trade scenario
Posted: Monday November 26, 2007 07:39AM ET
The Pacers lost out in the last seconds to the Cavs Sunday, their first loss in four games with Jermaine O'Neal sitting out with knee issues. Indiana, with a more open style, seems to move better without O'Neal in the lineup. They'd love to move him, but coming off knee surgery and with two seasons after this averaging more than $22 million, you figure it's almost impossible. Would the Pacers take on Stephon Marbury with one season left to save $23 million?--Chicago Tribune
AUTOADVERT
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/26/2007  4:09 PM
Keep in mind, O'Neal is a big time shotblocker (2.6 per last year), but is his knee so far gone that he's not gonna be an effective player anymore.

How would you fit him in with Zach/Curry (you can't). Could you trade one of those two elsewhere?
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34121
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/26/2007  4:16 PM
No... I can just imagine the headlines with Randolph/Curry/JO/Lee sharing minutes.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/26/2007  4:18 PM
How about Marbury and Randolph for O'Neal, Tinsley and Daniels?
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/26/2007  4:22 PM
Would you do Marbury for Jermaine O'Neal?

I wouldn't, but I'd let you do him!

Like this:Oh, Stephoooon

oohah
Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/26/2007  4:23 PM
Posted by oohah:
Would you do Marbury for Jermaine O'Neal?

I wouldn't, but I'd let you do him!

Like this:Oh, Stephoooon

oohah

I think Kathleen Decker tried this and didn't work.

TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
11/26/2007  4:32 PM
Posted by VDesai:

How about Marbury and Randolph for O'Neal, Tinsley and Daniels?

Indy won't make that trade... their whole purpose would be to gain cap space... Zach's contract is an albatross that we'll have to eat for the next 3 years before he becomes tradeable again... our best hope to get JO is to include Curry in the deal, & even then you also likely have to give up D Lee in the process along w/Malik & Fred Jones' contracts... no way would they want any part of Marbury unless they just planned to buy him out
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34121
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

11/26/2007  4:34 PM
Posted by VDesai:

How about Marbury and Randolph for O'Neal, Tinsley and Daniels?

Don't see how that makes the Knicks better... I just see it hurting the team more in the long run. They won't be any good and add more longer-term contracts. The move should be to trade these guys for expiring or buy Marbury out.
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/26/2007  4:35 PM
I am all for moving zach, but what is the state with JO's knees? is he done?
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
11/26/2007  4:37 PM
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by VDesai:

How about Marbury and Randolph for O'Neal, Tinsley and Daniels?

Don't see how that makes the Knicks better... I just see it hurting the team more in the long run. They won't be any good and add more longer-term contracts. The move should be to trade these guys for expiring or buy Marbury out.


For one I think its better balance. You get a PG who passes and a good shotblocker who has been a 20-10 guy. And also a guy who can play the 3. However you're adding a lot of salary. Is this supporting cast you want to put around Curry?


[Edited by - vdesai on 11-26-2007 4:38 PM]
DarkKnicks
Posts: 21064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/29/2005
Member: #882
Spain
11/26/2007  4:41 PM
I really dont know if I would do that trade, but Im pretty sure the Pacers would not do it.
blueNorange
Posts: 20401
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/31/2007
Member: #1413
USA
11/26/2007  4:44 PM
no
some Knick fans accept mediocrity as excellence .... I don't!
bishop
Posts: 20305
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/31/2003
Member: #480
Canada
11/26/2007  4:46 PM
IM all for J.O. but we cant have four big guys sharing the minutes, david lee gets screwed out of minutes. And if you think Isiah has problems with Steph, you should of seen the problems Isiah had with Tinsley. I mean as the coach of the Pacers he decided it was time to stop talking to his floor general since they didnt like each other.
NYKresurrection
Posts: 20561
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/23/2006
Member: #1230

11/26/2007  4:56 PM
pick up JO for Marbs then trade Zach and Crawful and Nate and Lee to LA for kobe

C = CURRY
PF = JO
SF = BALKMAN
SG = KOBE
PG = MARDY
GOD arose JESUS from the grave !!! Isiah arose the Knicks from their grave !!!
Panos
Posts: 30716
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
11/26/2007  5:08 PM
Posted by NYKresurrection:

pick up JO for Marbs then trade Zach and Crawful and Nate and Lee to LA for kobe

C = CURRY
PF = JO
SF = BALKMAN
SG = KOBE
PG = MARDY

Don't think LA bites, but if they would: cosign.
GodSaveTheKnicks
Posts: 23952
Alba Posts: 21
Joined: 11/21/2006
Member: #1207
USA
11/26/2007  5:54 PM
read my lips.

no new contracts.
Let's try to elevate the level of discourse in this byeetch. Please
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
11/26/2007  6:36 PM
Starpunching never dies... NEVER
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
11/26/2007  7:33 PM
Posted by NYKresurrection:

pick up JO for Marbs then trade Zach and Crawful and Nate and Lee to LA for kobe

C = CURRY
PF = JO
SF = BALKMAN
SG = KOBE
PG = MARDY

Dreams are nice. Sam Smith is an idiot who invents his own bogus rumors though. Ignore everything the man writes.

The reality of it all is we'll struggle once again to win 30-something games, Isiah will get fired at season's end, and the new guy will have a firesale because you absolutely MUST tear this entire roster down. There is no miracle trade nor no two miracle trades that can fix this disaster of a roster. No trade will make all the shortcomings of the present players disappear. Crawford will still jack up bricks. Curry will still stink at defense. Malik will still be washed up. Jerome still useless. Etc.....
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
11/26/2007  8:20 PM
This is one of the most rediculous threads I ever seen in my life. suckbury for O'Neal? Yeah!
I'll never trust this' team again.
JaydeeNYC
Posts: 20056
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/17/2007
Member: #1745
USA
11/26/2007  8:23 PM
YES.. i would absolutely make this deal if it presented itself! Then I would move place a call to Sacramento and beg them to take Curry, Crawford and Mardy Collins for Bibby and Artest

O'neal/ Lee/ Morris/ James
Randolph/ Jeffries
Artest/ Balkman/ Chandler
Richardson/ Jones
Bibby/ Robinson
New York is the Basketball Mecca of the World... NYK Fans deserve a winning squad-- Ball Up!
Would you do Marbury for Jermaine O'Neal?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy