It's not about hating. It's about giving someone a chance, and if you're not liking what you're seeing, then you have every right to criticize, if it's not bringing positive results. This was pretty much me right here:

Trade for Moochie Norris - Indifferent. Could have cared less.

Marbury trade - Happy about it. Gave him a chance, but it didn't do shizat for us and is now hurting us bad.

Tim Thomas/Nazr trade - Thought it was cool at first, but it started hurting at the start of the very next season.

Crawford trade - I hated bringing him in b/c I knew about his game, but I grew partial to him b/c he seemed like a good kid and he seemed to have some leadership qualities, but it also left us nowhere.

I liked Isiah drafting Ariza, could have cared less about Vin Baker.

So what was up to Isiah's first Summer and basically where we were left off in his first year. I knew something fishy was going on by the Winter, b/c I felt every move, besides the Ariza draft was quite questionable, and then he made a series of terrible moves after that, which kiled us.

And to think, I was THRILLED when Isiah first came in. Absolutely thrilled. All I could think of was him drafting T-Mac and Camby. I gave him all the chances in the world. He threw everyone away and deserves every bit of criticism from me, and deserves me wanting him to be gone, along with Marbury.

So yes, the next guy will get a chance, but if nothing comes of it, like Isiah's ways, then I'll be calling for his head too.

If he brings in Magic Johnson no. If he brings in real basketball minds that either have a history of success at their position or a former Knick like Mark Jackson I will stop complaining. I was very excited when Isiah was hired. I could not believe how badly Layden had run the Knicks after being so successful in Utah. Thomas has done a much worse job. The Knicks were bad under Layden under Thomas they are bad, in turmoil, dysfunctional, and considered an unprofessional organization after legal action was taken against them. Layden didn't burn through hall of fame coaches either. The Knicks are laughingstocks and considered the worst run organization in professional sports.

It's gonna take at least 3 years of no starphucking for the new GM to win me over. Otherwise, I'll be skeptical of any corporate run Knicks team

Posted by franco12:

Assuming Dolan comes out, does a semi apology for his starphuch and says its a true rebuild now without Isiah, and that he is going to actually hire a real GM and let him have a plan to build a championship caliber team, instead of assembling misfitting talented, but flawed players-


will that be enough to instead of being upset at last nights loss, to instead be excited, but obviously disappointed?

Full disclosure- I have become a full on hater. I never wanted Isiah, but I've defended some of his moves - but I've had enough and there is no more.

Technically if Dolan were to go with a rebuild strategy I wouldn't mind Isiah remaining GM for a while. Thing is though, since he doesn't know how to build a team, he'd have to be replaced at some point anyway.

but I think a big reason why Isiah made some of the moves he made was because of Dolan/Mills compelling him to starphuck.

Thats one thing that makes me worry about this franchise. Even if Isiah goes, if Dolan influences the desicion making of the new GM in certain ways, I don't know how much better things would be.

Three Puppets who need their strings "JERKED"

I just wish this bad dream would end; the most likely way for that to happen is to fire Isiah. The baskebtall part aside, he's made the organization an embarrassment.

But, I have to say, whatever GM does come in here will have better assets to work with than Isiah had. That says something also.

I want, nay, demand reparations before I stop hating.

I'm going to jump into my time machine, and going back to the day after oohah was conceived, then I'm slipping his mom a "Morning After" pill.

Whats with all the Mark Jax talk? What he done other than talk?