[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

We have the depth to limit major minutes that caused us problematic injuries last year
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/9/2007  11:04 PM
I dont think we need to pencil in EC for 35+ minutes every night. I think he can go a hard 25-28 as can Marbury to help sustain them for the whole season. I like the frontcourt rotation with Lee Randolph Curry and Morris. Add in the help/intangible 3s Balkman and Chandler and the best guards take the rest. At this point--I\\\'m inclined to consider H2O if he can really play 10-15 minutes because he adds one thing we do NOT have --- a true steady shot from the outside. I don\\\'t think it is necessary to watch any player from the backcourt go 1-9 or 3-15 anymore--rather have ball movement into the post of dribble drive than watching erratic shooters shoot 20%. The main theme here is we dont need to depend on anyone player we need to depend on the team as a whole and use our high quality depth.

[Edited by - BRIGGS on 10-09-2007 11:06 PM]
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/9/2007  11:21 PM
When you have a player like Zach on the floor, it's a boost to your offense, cuz he takes the pressure off of the other players having to produce. We have Curry and Lee as the other 2 high % players who should get a bulk of the touches. With Lee, you know you also get good passing and decision making. Overall i'm excited to see these guys this year. The rest of the team can fill in and that's great cuz this takes the pressure off of a guy like Jamal having to take more shots, Steph can basically coast and fill in when it's needed as can Q.

What you hope will happen is that Q and Steph will continue to work hard on D and that jamal will join them in putting out more effort since they don't have to carry the offense as they once did. As for Zach, Curry and Lee, it's possible that they will carry the bulk of the load, but as you say Briggs no one really has to burn themselves out on this roster.
newyorknewyork
Posts: 30376
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #541
10/9/2007  11:45 PM
We gotta get Lee mins. Curry should be good with 30mins. Randolph with about 32, 10-15 at center open up room for Lee to get burn, also keep lee limited from having to play SF so that Balkman could get burn.
https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
10/9/2007  11:53 PM
I cant wait to see how this team is roster is going to shape up. There is a lot of upside here. We should keep other big men in perpetual foul trouble. I'm not going to lie, I'm anxious to see what Houston can provide. Damn, we could use some outside touch to keep the power game honest.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
10/10/2007  1:07 AM
So you are talking about 12 man rotation:
2+2+3+3+2
Did this ever worked in NBA?
But from other hand 2-3 of them will be always hurt so it will be more conventional 9-10 man rotation.
And this will be all on Isiah to make it work with so many options on offense.
As per defence... yehh... we need to score 103-105 on avarage to stay 50%.
We should be able to crash teams with bad defence but teams with solid defense will make us look miserable.



[Edited by - arkrud on 10-10-2007 01:08 AM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
10/10/2007  1:44 AM
[quote]
Posted by arkrud:

So you are talking about 12 man rotation:
2+2+3+3+2
Did this ever worked in NBA?
But from other hand 2-3 of them will be always hurt so it will be more conventional 9-10 man rotation.
And this will be all on Isiah to make it work with so many options on offense.
As per defence... yehh... we need to score 103-105 on avarage to stay 50%.
We should be able to crash teams with bad defence but teams with solid defense will make us look miserable.


what is wrong with 4 bigs [1 of them is spot minutes
2 3s
4 guards? that is basically a 9-10 man rotation. Most teams use 8-9-10--why not play to your strength? Ask guys like EC to give it your all--go out and play 110% until you are tired and sub. same for marbury--he does not need to play 40+ minutes anymore--play a smart 25. We need Marbury healthy


This is how I go
Main 3 big Lee Randolp Curry Morris spot duty
2 3s Balkman and Chandler[jefferies while balkman is out
Marbury Crawford Richardson and either nate or collins
RIP Crushalot😞
TheGame
Posts: 26658
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
10/10/2007  8:36 AM
The problem is that other teams have a 10-man rotation where the 9th and 10th man don't expect to play more than 10-12 minutes, if that. We have 12 players who are going to want minutes and even if you only gave Rose and Collins spot minutes, the rest of the players will be expecting either 20 minutes a game (Balkman, Jeffries, Nate) or at least 30 minutes a game (Lee, Randolph, Curry, Marbury, Crawford, and Q), plus, Morris Randolph will want to get a consistent 5-8 minutes. IT is going to have a real problem getting guys minutes unless someone gets injured.
Trust the Process
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
10/10/2007  9:05 AM
I've thought we were always deep in the Isiah era and should've been playing a deeper roster. We've got some guys on the bench who can press and trap. Not saying that pressing and trapping is gonna lead our way to the title, but if we can change the pace of the game that will give us one advantage over all the other teams in the league and could be enough to get us enough wins to get to the playoffs. When the Suns started running and gunning again it took the league by surprise to some degree and they had a dominant regular season. When you have 12 guys who all can play why not take advantage of that in some way?

W/ regards to this, I think we never tried it b/c Marbury was a bad fit. Now with Randolph and Curry we're gonna play an even slower paced game.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
10/10/2007  9:28 AM
Posted by VDesai:

I've thought we were always deep in the Isiah era and should've been playing a deeper roster. We've got some guys on the bench who can press and trap. Not saying that pressing and trapping is gonna lead our way to the title, but if we can change the pace of the game that will give us one advantage over all the other teams in the league and could be enough to get us enough wins to get to the playoffs. When the Suns started running and gunning again it took the league by surprise to some degree and they had a dominant regular season. When you have 12 guys who all can play why not take advantage of that in some way?

W/ regards to this, I think we never tried it b/c Marbury was a bad fit. Now with Randolph and Curry we're gonna play an even slower paced game.

Exactly.
And with slower pace we do not need to play more that 9 players.
There is a lot of overhead on this poster.
But hey... IT was always chaotic person. He is one of the guys who can see the peaces but never can see the whole.
But it is OK. Not all people are good for this kind of job.









"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
10/10/2007  10:44 AM
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by VDesai:

I've thought we were always deep in the Isiah era and should've been playing a deeper roster. We've got some guys on the bench who can press and trap. Not saying that pressing and trapping is gonna lead our way to the title, but if we can change the pace of the game that will give us one advantage over all the other teams in the league and could be enough to get us enough wins to get to the playoffs. When the Suns started running and gunning again it took the league by surprise to some degree and they had a dominant regular season. When you have 12 guys who all can play why not take advantage of that in some way?

W/ regards to this, I think we never tried it b/c Marbury was a bad fit. Now with Randolph and Curry we're gonna play an even slower paced game.

Exactly.
And with slower pace we do not need to play more that 9 players.
There is a lot of overhead on this poster.
But hey... IT was always chaotic person. He is one of the guys who can see the peaces but never can see the whole.
But it is OK. Not all people are good for this kind of job.







Say What?

arkrud - I'm assuming you meant there is a lot of "overhead" on the roster. Can you please help me understand what that means?

"..He is one of the guys who can see the peaces but never can see the whole."

I agree with Martin that the Knicks have some pieces to improve the depth at key positions. The two forward slots have changed dramatically, while the image of Malik Rose shooting jumpers is less of a nightmare than last season.

and we all know the games aren't played on paper


once a knick always a knick
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
10/10/2007  11:44 AM
Posted by misterearl:
Posted by arkrud:
Posted by VDesai:

I've thought we were always deep in the Isiah era and should've been playing a deeper roster. We've got some guys on the bench who can press and trap. Not saying that pressing and trapping is gonna lead our way to the title, but if we can change the pace of the game that will give us one advantage over all the other teams in the league and could be enough to get us enough wins to get to the playoffs. When the Suns started running and gunning again it took the league by surprise to some degree and they had a dominant regular season. When you have 12 guys who all can play why not take advantage of that in some way?

W/ regards to this, I think we never tried it b/c Marbury was a bad fit. Now with Randolph and Curry we're gonna play an even slower paced game.

Exactly.
And with slower pace we do not need to play more that 9 players.
There is a lot of overhead on this poster.
But hey... IT was always chaotic person. He is one of the guys who can see the peaces but never can see the whole.
But it is OK. Not all people are good for this kind of job.







Say What?

arkrud - I'm assuming you meant there is a lot of "overhead" on the roster. Can you please help me understand what that means?

"..He is one of the guys who can see the peaces but never can see the whole."

I agree with Martin that the Knicks have some pieces to improve the depth at key positions. The two forward slots have changed dramatically, while the image of Malik Rose shooting jumpers is less of a nightmare than last season.

and we all know the games aren't played on paper

Redundant players:
Eddy-Zack
Lee - Malik – (Malik is useless)
Chan-Balk
Q-JJ2 (actually JJ2 is useless)
JJ1 - Morris (actually JJ1 is useless)
Craf-Nate-Nick-Jones-H20? (Is it too much?)
Steph - Mardy - JJ3 (Steph is already useless too)

We have 2 teams in one with both missing defense, shot blocking, and shooting.
This is just eclectic conglomerate of "whatever comes in Isiah way" guys





















[Edited by - arkrud on 10-10-2007 11:45 AM]

[Edited by - arkrud on 10-10-2007 11:46 AM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
10/10/2007  11:52 AM
"Whatever Comes in Isish's Way..."

arkrud - you post only illustrates a lack of basketball nuance and detail.

If you have watched them play, could you please provide the reasons why Eddy and Zach are redundant?

once a knick always a knick
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/10/2007  12:01 PM
Posted by arkrud:

Redundant players:
Eddy-Zack
Lee - Malik – (Malik is useless)
Chan-Balk
Q-JJ2 (actually JJ2 is useless)
JJ1 - Morris (actually JJ1 is useless)
Craf-Nate-Nick-Jones-H20? (Is it too much?)
Steph - Mardy - JJ3 (Steph is already useless too)

We have 2 teams in one with both missing defense, shot blocking, and shooting.
This is just eclectic conglomerate of "whatever comes in Isiah way" guys

Whatever comes in Isiah's way? There's not much wrong with this roster. We also have to wait and see how his final cuts shake out and what his rotation will be.

Arkrud and anyone else who chooses to bash the team's makeup. How many NBA teams are perfectly built in that they have a balanced roster in a traditional sense?
Obviously it's not easy to put together a roster that is balanced. We have one that is as close to that as you can expect at this point. We've got C, PF and SF covered well for now and into the future.
We've got SG covered also. Now we don't have pure PG's but instead combo guards, so that's really the only thing that we don't have from a prototypical roster standpoint.

I think that too often people throw mud at this roster and it's really not warranted. This isn't a bad team, they've just played poorly. That can change with hard work and player development. You can choose to assume that nothing is changing with this team, but that's not true. We bottomed out in 2005. We made some forward progress in 2006 and now we can take another big step in 2007.
Every team has some kind of flaw, we just have to get better at limiting ours.
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
10/10/2007  12:04 PM
Hooked on Vocabulary

nixluva - think about it. Aren't the San Antiono Spurs an eclectic conglomerate?
once a knick always a knick
rocknick
Posts: 20027
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 10/8/2007
Member: #1691
USA
10/10/2007  12:07 PM
I have to agree with Earl regarding Eddy and Zach. The only thing that is redundant in those two is that neither is a very good defender. Other than that - two different players. Zach's range will actually open up the lane this yr.
Andrew
Posts: 26602
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #1
USA
10/10/2007  12:38 PM
The one area I am worried about is the 4 spot. An injury to Lee or Zach puts the Knicks in a difficult situation. It would be nice to have a Antonio Davis type player that could fill in defensively at the 4 and 5 until Morris is ready.
PURE KNICKS LOVE
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
10/10/2007  12:47 PM
Posted by misterearl:

Hooked on Vocabulary

nixluva - think about it. Aren't the San Antiono Spurs an eclectic conglomerate?

San Antonio is well oiled winning machine and has nothing extra.
Yep - they are boring from street-ballers perspective.
But I will take their "boring" roster over Knicks roster any day.
At least you will get respect as a fan - not just ass-jokes


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
10/10/2007  12:53 PM
Posted by nixluva:
Posted by arkrud:

Redundant players:
Eddy-Zack
Lee - Malik – (Malik is useless)
Chan-Balk
Q-JJ2 (actually JJ2 is useless)
JJ1 - Morris (actually JJ1 is useless)
Craf-Nate-Nick-Jones-H20? (Is it too much?)
Steph - Mardy - JJ3 (Steph is already useless too)

We have 2 teams in one with both missing defense, shot blocking, and shooting.
This is just eclectic conglomerate of "whatever comes in Isiah way" guys

Whatever comes in Isiah's way? There's not much wrong with this roster. We also have to wait and see how his final cuts shake out and what his rotation will be.

Arkrud and anyone else who chooses to bash the team's makeup. How many NBA teams are perfectly built in that they have a balanced roster in a traditional sense?
Obviously it's not easy to put together a roster that is balanced. We have one that is as close to that as you can expect at this point. We've got C, PF and SF covered well for now and into the future.
We've got SG covered also. Now we don't have pure PG's but instead combo guards, so that's really the only thing that we don't have from a prototypical roster standpoint.

I think that too often people throw mud at this roster and it's really not warranted. This isn't a bad team, they've just played poorly. That can change with hard work and player development. You can choose to assume that nothing is changing with this team, but that's not true. We bottomed out in 2005. We made some forward progress in 2006 and now we can take another big step in 2007.
Every team has some kind of flaw, we just have to get better at limiting ours.

To have a shot at winning in NBA you need 2-way players. At least 3-4 of starting 5 and 2-3 coming from the bench.
We have NON of this. Not a SINGLE 2-way player. We hope Lee, or Chan, or anybody will became one over time but for now we just Do NOT HAVE ANY.
We have only offensive skilled guys who are ZERO defensive and defensive skilled guys who cannot score. Is this what you call improvement?





[Edited by - arkrud on 10-10-2007 12:54 PM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
playa2
Posts: 34922
Alba Posts: 15
Joined: 5/15/2003
Member: #407

10/10/2007  1:30 PM
I will almost guarantee you if guys are not getting it done but starting, there will be griping on the bench probaly displayed in the media.

When you have this much talent on your roster it's always gonna be tough on a coach on who to play , especially if you aren't winninng consistently.

I hope the knicks come out blazing and learn to play smart heady tough basketball right out of the gate.

If not the media and knick haters will eat them and Isiah alive.

[Edited by - playa2 on 10-10-2007 13:32]
JAMES DOLAN on Isiah : He's a good friend of mine and of the organization and I will continue to solicit his views. He will always have strong ties to me and the team.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
10/10/2007  4:36 PM
Posted by playa2:

I will almost guarantee you if guys are not getting it done but starting, there will be griping on the bench probaly displayed in the media.

When you have this much talent on your roster it's always gonna be tough on a coach on who to play , especially if you aren't winninng consistently.

I hope the knicks come out blazing and learn to play smart heady tough basketball right out of the gate.

If not the media and knick haters will eat them and Isiah alive.

[Edited by - playa2 on 10-10-2007 13:32]

Ha-ha
Talk about cookies with stuffing


"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
We have the depth to limit major minutes that caused us problematic injuries last year

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy