2007-08 outlook: Who's improved thanks to offseason moves?
By John Hollinger

Improvement. That's the name of the game in the offseason, and it comes in all shapes and sizes. Teams can get better in a variety of ways -- through holdover players raising their games, through trimming dead wood from the previous season's roster, or by adding talent through the draft, trades or free agency. And sometimes, it doesn't even take any of that -- it just takes a different general on the sidelines pulling it all together.

But one thing remains constant: Standing pat is a formula for failure. In a business in which careers tend to be brief, it's imperative to constantly bring in new blood. Just ask the Miami Heat, who were so giddy about winning a championship in 2006 that they brought back the same roster last season -- and watched their aging crew fail to win a single playoff game in one of the weaker title defenses in league history.

Fortunately, half of the league's teams have made additions to their rosters that should prove quite helpful in the coming season, and that's the group I'll be discussing today. While not all of these moves were in the teams' best long-term interests ($24 million for Jason Kapono!?!?!?), what I want to do today is focus on how those maneuvers affect each team for this coming season in particular.

And if we're only looking at the upcoming season, even a fairly reckless move can have positive short-term effects.

With that as the background, here's a midsummer update showing the teams that have made themselves more formidable than they were a year ago and why:

(Major additions and subtractions are given in parentheses)


1. Houston Rockets
(added Mike James, Luis Scola, Jackie Butler and Aaron Brooks; lost Juwan Howard and Vassilis Spanoulis; replaced Jeff Van Gundy with Rick Adelman)

While you're focusing on the San Antonio-Dallas-Phoenix triumvirate in the West, don't sleep on Houston. The Rockets have quietly put together a roster that could very well be the last team standing in that conference in 2008.

Start with the decision to replace Van Gundy with Adelman -- a change in direction that will likely make the team more up-tempo and offensive-minded. They'll miss Van Gundy's defensive genius, but given the offensive stagnation this club showed in 2006-07, it's not a bad trade.

Moreover, hiring Adelman was especially important in this case because it basically adds another player to the roster. Bonzi Wells bristled under Van Gundy after showing up out of shape, and hardly played last season. But he seems excited by being reunited with Adelman, who coached him to a strong campaign in Sacramento two years ago.

From there, add in two vastly underrated trades. The first one pilfered James from Minnesota for Howard, giving the Rockets a do-over on the disastrous James-for-Rafer Alston trade two years ago. The second nabbed Scola and Butler from San Antonio in return for Spanoulis.

Scola, a skilled Argentinian who has been one of the best players in Europe for the past half-decade, will make an immediate impact as a starting power forward. Butler, as a young center with strong scoring skills in the post, should energize a second unit that was bereft of offense last season.

In the big picture, the Rockets aggressively addressed their three main problems: stagant offense, point guard and power forward. Between the coaching change, the additions of James and first-round pick Aaron Brooks at the point, the pickups of Scola and Butler up front, and the de facto addition of Wells, this team suddenly looks loaded. At this point in the offseason, nobody has upgraded more than this club.


2. Charlotte Bobcats
(added Jason Richardson and Jared Dudley; lost Brevin Knight; replaced Bernie Bickerstaff with Sam Vincent)

While cynics will claim that frugal Bobcats owner Robert Johnson only signed off on the Richardson deal because he had to get over the minimum salary floor, there's no question that the deal addressed a huge weakness that has plagued the Cats throughout their existence.

Richardson is a reliable scorer and rebounder -- one that will help push rookie bust Adam Morrison out of the rotation if he struggles again -- and gives the Bobcats a much-needed go-to guy late in games. It also allows sharpshooter Matt Carroll to shift to a more suitable sixth man role, where his defensive shortcomings won't be so glaring. As a late first-rounder, Dudley could be surprisingly effective too -- don't be shocked if he's earning important minutes by season's end. Add it up and a playoff run doesn't seem far-fetched at all.


3. Phoenix Suns
(added Grant Hill, Alando Tucker; lost James Jones)

The Suns sold one of their first-round draft picks (uh-gain) but they also used one to grab Tucker, a tweener who should be able to fill in a lot of the minutes played by Jones. But their big grab was Hill, who is as brittle as they come but still a star when he's healthy enough to go.

He should thrive in Phoenix's running game and take over Boris Diaw's role as the de facto point man when Steve Nash is out of the game. Plus, his willingness to sign on the cheap means the Suns might not be done maneuvering just yet. After four decades they're still looking for a title in the Valley of the Sun; Hill might be the guy to get them over the top.


4. New York Knicks
(added Zach Randolph, Wilson Chandler, Dan Dickau and Fred Jones; lost Steve Francis and Channing Frye)

I'd rank this higher if I had any faith in the ability of Curry and Randolph to defend with even a smidgen of enthusiasm or competence, but I don't. The two will combine to give the Knicks the league's most defensively disinterested frontcourt, and that should put them in the bottom five or so in defensive efficiency.

But offensively, the Knicks might be good enough to play .500 ball anyway. Randolph is a beast in the post, and he can play the high post and float in his feathery left-handed jumper if he needs to clear the lane for Curry. Adding Chandler, Dickau and Jones also helps in the depth department, especially if it gives Isiah Thomas the stones to finally cut Jerome James.

However, the Randolph deal didn't help the Knicks nearly as much as it did the rest of the league, who now can rejoice in several more years of expected luxury tax payments from Zeke's spendthrift regime.


5. Atlanta Hawks
(added Al Horford, Acie Law)

Throw in two more lottery picks to a cast that already includes rising stars Joe Johnson and Josh Smith, and suddenly the Hawks look a lot more like a real basketball team. Horford was one of the top talents in an extremely strong draft, and at his size he'll probably be able to play some center -- a spot where the Hawks have been badly undermanned in the past.

I'm less bullish on Law's prospects, but he can't be any worse than the gang that manned the point for Atlanta last season. As with Charlotte, it's possible this team's lottery days are coming to an end. Too bad nobody will be in the stands to see it.


6. Boston Celtics
(added Ray Allen; lost Wally Szczerbiak and Delonte West)

Long-term, I have grave doubts about whether this was the right move for Boston; as I've mentioned before, unless they're about to use Gerald Green and Theo Ratliff's expiring contract as bait to bring in another star, I hardly see the point of acquiring Allen.

But in the short-term, Allen will be a big upgrade on the Wally/West combo that manned a lot of the shooting guard minutes for Boston last season, and that should be enough to pull the C's out of the cellar in the Atlantic.


7. Memphis Grizzlies
(added Mike Conley, Darko Milicic; lost Chucky Atkins; replaced Tony Barone with Marc Iavaroni)

The Grizzlies added two coveted young talents in Conley and Milicic, with the latter being hugely important because of the lack of a dependable frontcourt sidekick for Pau Gasol. Conley also figures to make an impact, but given his youth, it may come more in future seasons than the present.

Besides, he's filling some big shoes: Unbeknownst to many, Atkins played out of his mind a year ago. Conley will be hard-pressed just to match those numbers this season, let alone exceed them. But with these two additions, Grizz fans at least can see some light at the end of the tunnel.


8. Washington Wizards
(added Nick Young, Oleksiy Pecherov; likely to add Juan Carlos Navarro)

Can it be? Do the Wizards finally have a bench? Adding three young players to the mix (their last two first-round picks plus whomever they trade Navarro for) certainly makes last season's fatally feeble second unit seem much more imposing for this go-round.

As those who read my draft preview know, I'm hugely skeptical of Young. But if all he has to do is improve upon Roger Mason Jr., I'm guessing he can handle that. Similarly, Pecherov is something of a mystery meat, but he can't be any worse than Jarvis Hayes was last year. And Navarro will be a solid No. 3 guard wherever he ends up, though right now the Wizards seem intent on a trade.


9. New Orleans Hornets
(added Morris Peterson, Julian Wright)

The Hornets filled their hole at the wings with free agent Peterson and first-rounder Wright, who should be a big upgrade on the Rasual Butler/Desmond Mason combo that filled the slot a year ago.

Peterson gives the team a legit perimeter threat, something it lacked a year ago once Peja Stojakovic went on the shelf, while Wright's all-around game should provide a nice complement off the bench. Between those two and Peja's return, the Hornets impotent offense of a year ago should be a thing of the past.


10. Sacramento Kings
(added Spencer Hawes and Mikki Moore; replaced coach Eric Musselman with Reggie Theus)

I have no idea if Theus can coach or not, and I think Musselman could do a pretty good job in the right situation. But nobody doubts that the wheels were coming off by the end of last year and that a change would be for the better, so in this case the Mussleman-for-Theus swap should be for the better.

Moreover, the Kings addressed their horrid frontcourt by adding two centers in Hawes and Moore. Neither is going to be great, but right now the Kings will settle for "adequate," especially given the price they paid. These moves may not keep them out of the lottery, but it will at least help stop the bleeding.


11. Los Angeles Lakers
(added Javaris Crittenton, Derek Fisher)

I'm not sure if this is enough to make Kobe rescind his trade demand, but it helps. The Lakers point guards were disastrous last season, so adding the veteran Fisher to take over for Smush Parker should pay immediate dividends (although the Lakers overpaid and will hate themselves for this two years from now, that's in the future -- remember, we're just looking at the impacts for 2007-08 today).

Crittenton was supposed to be a long-range pick, but he played well enough in summer league that folks may reconsider that position -- especially since at 6-foot-5, he has the size that Phil Jackson craves in the backcourt.


12. Chicago Bulls
(added Joakim Noah and Joe Smith; lost P.J. Brown)

Maybe power forward isn't the weak spot on the roster anymore. Already possessing a promising stud at the position in Tyrus Thomas, the Bulls added the energy of Noah and the veteran smarts of Smith to their roster, shoring up a spot manned by a fading Brown last season. No, none of these guys can score in the post, which is where the Bulls really could use help, but they'll add another jolt of energy to the frontcourt. Plus, they give Chicago yet more assets to throw into a trade for the likes of Kevin Garnett or Pau Gasol.


13. Toronto Raptors
(added Maceo Baston and Jason Kapono; lost Morris Peterson)

Kapono might not even be as good as Mo Pete, the man whose spot he takes at greater expense. But the big picture in Toronto is that they have three deadly shooters surrounding T.J. Ford and Chris Bosh, so defending the latter two on the pick-and-roll will be a pick-your-poison proposition. Additionally, the more important comparison was improving on Joey Graham -- who inexplicably became the starter last season after the team soured on Peterson -- and Kapono is more than up to that challenge.

In the meantime, don't sleep on Baston. The former Michigan star was a Euroleague stalwart for several years but didn't get a chance to show his goods in Indiana. That's likely to change in Toronto this year, where he'll provide an inexpensive source of frontcourt offense off the pine.


14. Detroit Pistons
(added Rodney Stuckey and Arron Afflalo)

I'm not sold on Afflalo at all, but Stuckey looks like the real deal, and should give Detroit a second-unit guard who can actually score once in awhile. After watching Flip Murray and Lindsey Hunter hoist brick after brick the past two seasons, Pistons fans are going to think this guy is the second coming of Dave Bing.

15. Philadelphia 76ers
(added Thaddeus Young and Jason Smith; lost Joe Smith)

The departed Joe Smith was one of the keys to the Sixers' strong second-half run last season, so losing him leaves a dent. On the other hand, they added two first-round picks in Young and Jason Smith, and my guess is the contributions of those two will offset what has been lost.

Not that you'll see much difference in the win column -- I suspect the Sixers will be terrible -- but these moves didn't make the news any worse. Given some of the previous offseason maneuvers by the Billy King regime, that's a victory in itself.

T-Mac was within 500 pts of eclipsing Marbury as the active leading (or alltime??) in points scored without winning a playoff series!

I like the Rockets and hope both the knicks and them advance to knock that title off both T-mac and BizzaroBury.

Here's what I don't get about the theory that our interior D will be horrible next year...

OUR INTERIOR D WAS HORRIBLE LAST YEAR

There's nowhere to go but up, and we improved on offense. So... stop the complaints about our ability to hold down the other team's 4.

[Edited by - johnwallace44 on 07-18-2007 2:41 PM]

actually it gets worse if you putting zach next to eddy he is pretty much saying what everyone else is thinking, the last two years he mention

1. Jerome James was the worst signing of the offseason

1. Jerome James, New York Knicks (five years, $28 million, 11.8 pts, 7.2 reb, 9.83 PER)
Of all the bad deals over the summer, this one takes the cake. It's one thing to overpay for a player who can play a little, like Johnson or Mobley. But what if you commit your full midlevel exception to a guy who can't play at all? That's what the Knicks did with James, rewarding him for the five good games he played in the Sacramento series and pretending the previous 82 games never happened. Between the inconsistent effort and the constant swooning over his alleged potential, James has become the new Michael Olowokandi, except that he's a worse player and even more egregiously overpaid.

2. Jared Jefferies for 60 million essentially because of the luxury tax, please just read that and laugh quickly would be a terrible signing

Why Isiah who is smarter than everyone else doesn't see these things?

• Signed Jared Jeffries. The Knicks gave the Wizards' forward a five-year deal for the midlevel exception, and he'll provide a bit of improvement since small forward has bedeviled the Knicks the past two years. He'll be the team's primary defensive stopper, but he's a very poor offensive player and the Knicks certainly overpaid here.

22. Jared Jeffries, Wizards (restricted)
He supposedly is getting a lot of interest, which surprises me in light of the fact that he's not any good. Yes, he had some nice moments defensively against LeBron James in the playoffs, but he also went 36 minutes without scoring a basket in the clinching Game 6 and shot 39.5 percent for the series.

Besides, nobody's comparing him to Bruce Bowen, and he needs to be that good an on-ball defender because the rest of his game is so poor. Jeffries' career high in points per 40 minutes is a meager 10.4 in 2004-05. Also, he is nothing special on the boards, makes way too many turnovers and is worse than Tim Duncan from the foul line. Anybody paying the full midlevel exception for this package will end up horribly disappointed.


Just for the record
Richardson worked out with Curry in Chicago over the summer and said the big man wanted to come to the Knicks. And he said Curry had been diligent about staying in shape this offseason, which has been a problem in the past. The two worked out at WestLoop Athletic Club, and Curry "was there earlier than us every day," says Richardson.
-this was the offseason when he was traded to the knicks when he came in about 30 pounds out of shape

So I tend to agree with everything he said, being a lover and refuting detail is just plain stupid, looking at things from a basketball objective instead of a fan is always smarter

I'm with you Solace, if these guys gave the effort on D that they give on offense you have enough talent to compete with anyone. Unfortunately some things aren't important to our players.

Just say they'll never be able to share the ball and play together and we're going to go down in flames. That's fine.

I can't buy the lack of Defense argument...
Frye was no good last year on D, and neither was Lee. Plus... who plays the 4 in the East that is even a 2nd scoring option?

I think Hollinger is too concerned with D. For one thing the Knicks are probably gonna be one of the best offensive teams in the league. Even with all the confusion and injuries last year this team could score with anyone. What we need to be most concerned with is Point Differential. We don't have to be the best defensive team. We just have to be good enough to slow teams down. Look at Wash. They STINK on D. They score 104 ppg, but they also gave up 104 ppg.

We won't be any worse inside on D than we were and I believe that they'll try harder than last year. It's the perimeter D that needs the most improvement. I think we can improve there as well. Q not being healthy didn't help, but now I expect that he'll be quicker and able to defend. I expect Jared, Balk and Mardy to be better as well. I expect Steph to play pretty much like he did last year on D. Overall I don't think our D is so bad that we can't improve it enough to win games. Don't get stuck on last year in terms of what this team will be able to do defensively. I think the chemistry will improve with a shorter rotation. Minus Francis and Frye, who I don't think really had their heads in the game.

The important thing is that we DO HAVE DEFENDERS on this team. I expect that the defensive chemistry will be better not worse. I think we can shave the pts allowed to about 97-98 ppg. I expect that we'll score about 98-100 ppg. What we're going to look to do is be MUCH more efficient on offense and that is gonna help our D. If we cut down on the TO's I think we'll have a great chance to improve defensively. Those TO's lead to a lot of easy buckets. If we can get them down to about 14-15 per, that would be excellent for us.

Posted by TMS:

if Zach played defense, he'd still be in POR.

I think would be true for every other player in the league except Zach. Too many problems and Portland wanted to change their image in a bad way.

I think Hollinger, as usual, was ripping the Knicks' deals more than he would have if it were another team. I mean, you lose Francise and Frye and bring in Randolph. Francise was clearly a negative last year, so we improve by 1 or 2 wins just be getting that guy off the team. Randolph is probably no worse a defender than Frye but will bring a much more polished and consistent offensive game. I understand the points about the defense, but really I think IT is right. Our interior man-to-man defense was not terrible. It was our perimeter defense and our help defense that was bad. Our help defense is not likely to improve with Zach, but if IT can get our guards and SFs to play better perimeter defense, I think we can become a better defensive team than last year. MOre importantly, we now have someone who can score in the post when Curry is out of the game, which will be huge for our second unit. I think the Knicks had one of the better offseasons and IT is probably still not done.

Actually he ranked us the fourth most improved team in the entire NBA. Meaning we had the fourth best offseason of every team in the NBA. Meaning if Curry and Zach play D we could be the most improved team in the NBA.

How is that hate????????????? Simply because he didn't name us number one?

Well when you add a 61 million dollar contract for a guy with a questionable personal history, someone that has been injured badly, demands the ball and averages 0.2blks a game next to a center that average 0.5blks a game, and your starting crawford you can't keep his man out of the paint i think defense is a tremendous problem.

You guys act like lee is a horrible defender, which is just not the case, when isiah has him guard rashard lewis, gerald wallace because isiah is a ****ing idiot, Lee looks horrible. But fact of the matter is that he blew the pick on frye and combounded it with jefferies and left a role for the team at the three which he thought jefferies would fill so he had to play lee at the 3.

The Bobcats added Jason Richardson, and we had our hands full last year so you can make the case they are better because they are pluggin in a guy that doesn't need it all night long and they have a great 1-3 that we can't guard. And Okafur is a better player that curry.

No one should be optimistic about Isiahs ability's. Jamal MGagloire was signed to a one year deal and it 10x the player james is, and the combination of him and collins is going to give curry problems. Isiah believed Marbury and Francis could play together and i didn't work much like every deal he has made, crawford, q, rose, so a wait and see and number 4 slot ain't bad