[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Initial Evaluation of our Rookies
Author Thread
Ira
Posts: 24695
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
7/16/2007  5:03 AM
Although we're only talking about 5 games against players, some of whom never have and never will play in the nba game, this is our first opportunity to look at our rooks in actual game competition. I'm curious to see how other UKers felt about how our rookies did.

The thing that pleased me most was our players' versatility - especially Chandler. Chandler was good defensively, he boarded pretty well, can hit a jumper and isn't afraid to pass the ball. Morris didn't shoot a lot, but was effective when he did. He boarded very well and was physical inside, though on the slow side. Nichols may have been the best of the three - shooting very well, playing agressive d, and passing the ball well. He still needs to work on his ball handling, but even that isn't real bad.

Now let's consider where we picked these guys. Chandler was the 23rd pick in the first round, Nichols came with a trade that cost us next years 2nd round pick and Morris was a freebie. I think all three show signs of sticking in this league. All in all, I think we got great value in this years draft. What do you think?
AUTOADVERT
Ira
Posts: 24695
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
7/16/2007  5:13 AM
Here are some stats for our rookies.

Chandler
13.4 ppg, 5.2 rebs, 2.0 blk, 1.0 stl, 50.9% FG, 40.0% 3pfg, in 28.2 minutes per game

Morris
11.2 ppg, 9.2 rpg, 1.2 blks, 1.0 stl, 63.3% FG in 27.0 minutes

Nichols
15.6 ppg, 52.6% FG, 39.1% 3pFG in just 24.4 minutes. also 2.6 ast, 2.0 rebs
TheGame
Posts: 26658
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
7/16/2007  5:54 AM
It looks like IT's spin machine was correct this time. There was talk that Chandler would have been a first round pick and maybe even a lottery pick next year. I think Chandler showed that he is definitely 1st round material. I was really surprised with his shooting. He looked very comfortable hitting NBA 3 pointers and his mid-range jumper. He is more skilled than I anticipated.

Nichols showed that he was more than a standstill 3pt specialist. This kid can penetrate and has a pull-up jumper off the dribble. He also has some decent passing skills and can defend. For a second round pick, this guy was a steal.

Morris has a pretty decent shot around the basket and played more aggressively than I thought he would. The kid will be a decent backup PF/C with the potential to do even more. He is a bit slow, but he is not a stiff and he is strong and rebounds fairly well.

All in all, this year's draft picks might out do last year's picks.
Trust the Process
JUNKMEIN
Posts: 20401
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/14/2004
Member: #797
7/16/2007  7:50 AM
Several weeks ago I said that Morris was a baller and was told I was jumping the gun for it. That assessment was certainly not absurd compared to these absurd Balkman for AK47 trade proposals i've been hearing.

I saw this kid more than hold his own against Florida's front line and now you see why. He is a Center because he plays like one. He's Curry's backup for sure.

Nichols is deadeye and all of that business about being in Europe is a big joke. He'll be here this year.

Finally to Chandler. Chandler is more polished than any player Isiah's drafted since arriving in NY. He would have no problem playing the two. He's the total package and will crack the lineup this year because he's better than Jamal (who I like) right now.
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
7/16/2007  8:14 AM
I'm thinking that we'll drop Dickau and James the more that I think about it.

Its horrible that the Knicks will be on the hook for his whole deal when he can't come to camp in shape. In the NFL he would have been sent home with some pocket change by now.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
7/16/2007  8:50 AM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

I'm thinking that we'll drop Dickau and James the more that I think about it.

Its horrible that the Knicks will be on the hook for his whole deal when he can't come to camp in shape. In the NFL he would have been sent home with some pocket change by now.

Actually- if Jerome doesn't show up in shape- there is some, I think, room in the CBA to send him packing.

Still, a buy out looks more likely. And I think Dickau sticks- he is the only pure PG we have.

Right now, I think Jones & JJ1 are the roster casualties.

VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/16/2007  8:57 AM
Chandler was a surprise to me. He played smooth and under control. He really worked that baseline well and got in position for a lot of finishes. His shot was better and more consistent than advertised and I thought his D and rebounding was solid. He has a real good vert.

Nichols definitely was impressive driving to the basket when his shot wasn't there. He used the headfake and dribble well and showed what seemed to be a bit better than average athleticism.

Morris was solid overall on the boards and also had a few nice shot blocks. That last game I thought he showcased a really nice touch from the field and some decen moves in the post. A couple of the turnarounds looked "Ewing-esque," though certainly he has a ways to go. He played good bball for not being a focal point on offense.

Most importantly I thought all 3 played smart, under control bball. They passed well and had their heads up on D.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/16/2007  9:38 AM
Nichols to me was the star of the summer-league. I've said it a few times already but I watched the kid for 4 years at Syrcause very closely, since I'm a 'Cuse fan and he never lived up to expectations until his senior year, where he was very good. So I was still curious to see if his senior year was a flash in the pan or not. Nichols had a silky smooth jumper on display, he showed he could hit with a man in his face, off balance or wide-open, his defense wasn't great but it wasn't bad either, just solid all around, but I sure know we can use his J on this team, no matter what.

Randolph Morris was alright, he got better as the tournament went on, which is good. I wasn't very impressed with his offense though. In college I thought his offense was pretty good and that he'd translate well into the NBA. He's a big man though so he may just need more time, he basically is a rookie so its ok. His rebounding was especially good and his defense was solid. He can improve on his defense and offensive game though.

Chandler is the guy I'm curious about. Now I know everyone says he was the ultimate sleeper 1st round pick but honestly, how could GMs in the NBA not know this guy and his game? I could see it if he played in some crappola conference like the Sunbelt or something but he was playing for DePaul in the BIG EAST. GM's had to have seent his guy. His game in the summer-league was very good, he had a nice jumper, played good defense, could rebound, pass.. basically do a little of everything. I'm curious how he plays once the season starts becuase I seriously can't see how GMs could overlook him playing in the Big East.

All in all a great tournament for our 3 rooks.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
MS
Posts: 27065
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
7/16/2007  9:44 AM
Again Macje Lampe averaged 16.5pts and was looked at as a steal, our rookies played well but again its still summer league and a lot of players that put up huge numbers hardly play in the league
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
7/16/2007  9:49 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Nichols to me was the star of the summer-league. I've said it a few times already but I watched the kid for 4 years at Syrcause very closely, since I'm a 'Cuse fan and he never lived up to expectations until his senior year, where he was very good. So I was still curious to see if his senior year was a flash in the pan or not. Nichols had a silky smooth jumper on display, he showed he could hit with a man in his face, off balance or wide-open, his defense wasn't great but it wasn't bad either, just solid all around, but I sure know we can use his J on this team, no matter what.

Randolph Morris was alright, he got better as the tournament went on, which is good. I wasn't very impressed with his offense though. In college I thought his offense was pretty good and that he'd translate well into the NBA. He's a big man though so he may just need more time, he basically is a rookie so its ok. His rebounding was especially good and his defense was solid. He can improve on his defense and offensive game though.

Chandler is the guy I'm curious about. Now I know everyone says he was the ultimate sleeper 1st round pick but honestly, how could GMs in the NBA not know this guy and his game? I could see it if he played in some crappola conference like the Sunbelt or something but he was playing for DePaul in the BIG EAST. GM's had to have seent his guy. His game in the summer-league was very good, he had a nice jumper, played good defense, could rebound, pass.. basically do a little of everything. I'm curious how he plays once the season starts becuase I seriously can't see how GMs could overlook him playing in the Big East.

All in all a great tournament for our 3 rooks.


The way Isiah is getting a leg up on other GM's in the draft is that he is taking players that have NBA games, but not so much college games. Like G-Mac in reverse. Certain players, mostly because of spacing issues can operate much better on the NBA level than they do in college. Mardy, Ariza, Balkman, Nichols, and Chandler fit that mold.

UConn has a player like this every year because they are picking up guys with NBA builds that don't always work in college where there is less spacing especially for small forward types.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
JohnWallace44
Posts: 25119
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 6/14/2005
Member: #910
USA
7/16/2007  9:49 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Nichols to me was the star of the summer-league. I've said it a few times already but I watched the kid for 4 years at Syrcause very closely, since I'm a 'Cuse fan and he never lived up to expectations until his senior year, where he was very good. So I was still curious to see if his senior year was a flash in the pan or not. Nichols had a silky smooth jumper on display, he showed he could hit with a man in his face, off balance or wide-open, his defense wasn't great but it wasn't bad either, just solid all around, but I sure know we can use his J on this team, no matter what.

Randolph Morris was alright, he got better as the tournament went on, which is good. I wasn't very impressed with his offense though. In college I thought his offense was pretty good and that he'd translate well into the NBA. He's a big man though so he may just need more time, he basically is a rookie so its ok. His rebounding was especially good and his defense was solid. He can improve on his defense and offensive game though.

Chandler is the guy I'm curious about. Now I know everyone says he was the ultimate sleeper 1st round pick but honestly, how could GMs in the NBA not know this guy and his game? I could see it if he played in some crappola conference like the Sunbelt or something but he was playing for DePaul in the BIG EAST. GM's had to have seent his guy. His game in the summer-league was very good, he had a nice jumper, played good defense, could rebound, pass.. basically do a little of everything. I'm curious how he plays once the season starts becuase I seriously can't see how GMs could overlook him playing in the Big East.

All in all a great tournament for our 3 rooks.


The way Isiah is getting a leg up on other GM's in the draft is that he is taking players that have NBA games, but not so much college games. Like G-Mac in reverse. Certain players, mostly because of spacing issues can operate much better on the NBA level than they do in college. Mardy, Ariza, Balkman, Nichols, and Chandler fit that mold.

UConn has a player like this every year because they are picking up guys with NBA builds that don't always work in college where there is less spacing especially for small forward types.
Alan Hahn: Nate Robinson has been on a ridonkulous scoring tear lately (remember when he couldn't hit Jerome James with a Big Mac in early January?)
nyk4ever
Posts: 41014
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
7/16/2007  9:57 AM
Posted by JohnWallace44:

The way Isiah is getting a leg up on other GM's in the draft is that he is taking players that have NBA games, but not so much college games. Like G-Mac in reverse. Certain players, mostly because of spacing issues can operate much better on the NBA level than they do in college. Mardy, Ariza, Balkman, Nichols, and Chandler fit that mold.

UConn has a player like this every year because they are picking up guys with NBA builds that don't always work in college where there is less spacing especially for small forward types.

I definitely agree with that idea, its evident with the Lee, Balkman and Mardy picks and we'll see how Chandler actually does translate. The one guy Isiah totally missed the boat with is Frye though, there is and never was anything that is NBA about his game or build.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/16/2007  10:06 AM
Nichols-Showed the ability to put it on the floor in the Big EAst. Not surprised by his ability at all. SEems like the past few years scouts have ignored the Big East talent. He comes from a great coach and his fundamentally sound. Not sure if he can crack the rotation right away but there is no doubt that he should be on the roster. It would be a shame to keep a guy like JJ, Dickau, Jones etc. over this guy

Morris-Looked very solid. Again, seems to be well coached. REbounds, scores and can play team ball. No reason why a lazy JJ should get any time over this guy. Why do I get the feeling that he will?

Chandler-Again love his game. Similar situation as Nichols. Has the skills to play in the NBA but will have to compete hard to get any time. He's a rookie so that's fine

Overall-The guys looked great. They also disproved the theory that players need 2-3 years to gel and learn to play together. It's amazing how guys that are well coached and not excuse makers can learn to gel in a matter of days. As the famous analyst, Bippity once said. Trim the fat Isiah. Trim the fat. Get rid of the lazy and start getting these guys into the rotation. Do not use Nichols and Balkman and Chandler and Morris as trade fodder for the next great "superstar". But change our complexion by getting them into the rotation.



[Edited by - bippity10 on 16-07-2007 10:07 AM]
I just hope that people will like me
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
7/16/2007  10:17 AM
Posted by nyk4ever:

Nichols to me was the star of the summer-league. I've said it a few times already but I watched the kid for 4 years at Syrcause very closely, since I'm a 'Cuse fan and he never lived up to expectations until his senior year, where he was very good. So I was still curious to see if his senior year was a flash in the pan or not. Nichols had a silky smooth jumper on display, he showed he could hit with a man in his face, off balance or wide-open, his defense wasn't great but it wasn't bad either, just solid all around, but I sure know we can use his J on this team, no matter what.

Randolph Morris was alright, he got better as the tournament went on, which is good. I wasn't very impressed with his offense though. In college I thought his offense was pretty good and that he'd translate well into the NBA. He's a big man though so he may just need more time, he basically is a rookie so its ok. His rebounding was especially good and his defense was solid. He can improve on his defense and offensive game though.

Chandler is the guy I'm curious about. Now I know everyone says he was the ultimate sleeper 1st round pick but honestly, how could GMs in the NBA not know this guy and his game? I could see it if he played in some crappola conference like the Sunbelt or something but he was playing for DePaul in the BIG EAST. GM's had to have seent his guy. His game in the summer-league was very good, he had a nice jumper, played good defense, could rebound, pass.. basically do a little of everything. I'm curious how he plays once the season starts becuase I seriously can't see how GMs could overlook him playing in the Big East.

All in all a great tournament for our 3 rooks.

To answer your question about Chandler, I guess it the same GMs who didn't even feel it necessary to give Nichols a look before the 53rd pick in the draft.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
7/16/2007  10:19 AM
Posted by MS:

Again Macje Lampe averaged 16.5pts and was looked at as a steal, our rookies played well but again its still summer league and a lot of players that put up huge numbers hardly play in the league

That's right. That is why I am going to hold my breath on this kid Durant.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/16/2007  10:21 AM
nyk- I'm a big Rutgers/Big East guy and having seen Chandler in a few games, to me he looked like night and day. He was very erratic in the college games I saw and under control and smooth in these games. Isiah made a smart move here, shutting down this kid's workouts. Whatever it was with him- he spotted it early on and didn't let the rest of the NBA in on it. He did the same thing with Frye and it worked out his rookie year cause he even looked like a steal at 8(for whatever reason, the magic beans he was taking wore off last year and he reverted to what seemed to be his college form). I'll give him major credit there.

[Edited by - vdesai on 07-16-2007 10:22 AM]
VDesai
Posts: 43302
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
7/16/2007  10:24 AM
I think with Nichols they saw erratic career performance and saw what seemed to be average athleticism and it branded him a 2nd round prospect. I still thought he seemed to be worthy of the pick at 23 especially after he did so great at the camps, but he still slipped somehow.

I think what you're seeing, and its been a trend for the last 4-5 years now, is the 2nd round talent is shaping up to be true NBA talent now. Talent is coming from more sources and catching up with expansion.
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
7/16/2007  11:11 AM
Chandler's game on offense reminds me of Tim Thomas. And I mean that only in a good way of course. He can score from deep, midrange, and at the rim. I was especially impressed at his ability to hit the pull-up, stop on a dime short-to-midrange J. He gets that shot off quickly and with accuracy. If he can keep that up it will open up the rest of the court for him.

Nichols reminds me Walter McCarty with an offensive game. Long and rangey and they both move with that kind of limbs-flailing-everywhere motion. But of course Nichols is a lot further along offensively with that J of his.

Morris isn't in your face impressive, but he's solid. Seems a bit on the shorter side-- seems more like 6'9" than 6'11" and plays below the rim. But he has a good presence on the boards and he has a nice little jumper inside of 10 feet. That's perfectly fine for this team to be honest. Between Curry, Randolph and Lee there's only going to be something like 10mpg available for a 4th guy at the power positions which is a role Morris could fill perfectly.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
Ira
Posts: 24695
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
7/16/2007  11:24 AM
This was a very deep draft. Most of the time, there's not much available in the second round. You don't expect second round picks to stick - even as backups. In this years draft there will be many players who have good nba careers.
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
7/16/2007  11:29 AM
Chandler- What a smooth athlete. Like Balkman he's a natural defender and showed a knack for shot blocking. His rebounding was also good, and like Balk he has a good enough handle to grab a board and take off with it. This shooting was very good and way ahead of where anyone expected, what was also impressive about that was the way he always followed his shot, that lead to a lot of second chance baskets for him and points for the Knicks.

Nichols- This kid was so game! Not the natural defender Balk and Chandler are, he was out there using his length and trying. And he was resourceful, when his shot wasn't falling, he took it too the rim and showed some Pearlish fakes and stops and starts. So he didn't stop scoring just cause his shot was off - that's awesome. He needs to improve his handle a bit, especially in transition and stay a little stronger on the ball, but it's a joke that a 6'8" scoring machine fell to round 2.

Morris- this kid is always gonna be underrated because he does everything right. The fact that he is so fundamentally sound disguises his athleticism which you really only see when he is bouncing after rebounds, recovering and blocking shots, and when he gets the ball in transition. He has some really nice moves around the basket and an excellent pair of hands. He shows a knack for interior D!!!!! And was also johnny on the spot with screens and help. This guy was a heist and we can't let him go the Jackie Butler route.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
Initial Evaluation of our Rookies

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy