[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Why would shouldn't trade Jamal Crawford
Author Thread
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
6/15/2007  9:16 AM
http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/knicks/video/xqs4b_mix-jamal-crawford-knicks/1
AUTOADVERT
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/15/2007  9:24 AM
huh? We shouldn't trade Jamal because he is good material for videos?

I thought we were trying to win games, get to the play offs and win a championship?

Jamal=talented, but flawed.

If he can be moved & his salary cleared, do it!

The only reason we shouldn't trade Jamal is if the player being offered back has a worse contract.

Its rebuild time. Crawford could have more value on a team like Cleveland or Detroit- in fact- Cleveland could have used someone like Jamal- a player that can hit pressure shots.

But off the bench and not starting. He is hot as often as he is cold.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/15/2007  9:38 AM
trading him is fine with me as long as we get a real quality player in return... i don't give him up for garbage just to unload his contract tho.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/15/2007  9:43 AM
I am not his biggest fan, but i am not trading him to a team like miami or cleveland because he will flourish next to a superstar that gets him wide open shots.

I would however like him to end up on a good team. Ideal fits would be, the Spurs, Jazz, Lakers in the west. He would get a ton of open shots the offense would not be run through him and he would be a valuable piece because they would have a system for him.

I think the Jazz would be perfect with a low post booz and deron
Michael6835
Posts: 21319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/12/2004
Member: #828
6/15/2007  9:56 AM
How about we just keep him. He is young and has proven that he can hit pressure shots. He makes his mistakes but thats just Jamal. I was speaking to a Cav fan and he said this to me about Jamal. Out of seven games, Jamal will play well in about 5 of those games, the other 2 he will just terrible. That's just Jamal, live with it. He is good talent, you only trade him if you are getting somebody really good in return.

Sometimes you have take a step back and read what your writing. You want to send him to another team where he can flourish and do all these spectacular things and excel. Why do we want to get rid of him when it's clear that he has an upside ? The team is heading is that direction, where ? A direction where he will get open shots, one where he doesn't have to carry a team. My vote is to keep him, unless a franchise talent comes along.
M
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/15/2007  10:03 AM
Yea because he is never going to be a good player with someone like isiah here, you spoke to a cavs fan, thanks for the inside info, speak to a knicks fan that actually watches this kid. He is good half the time and horrible the other half....

Isiah has given Jamal the green light, to play out of control shoot whenever he wants, and he allows him to play this way while not playing any defense, being careless with the ball and not running the offense. So where is his incentive to get better. I simply stated he could flourish in the right situation which is not with a soft coach that doesn't demand defense.

Getting rid of contracts should be this teams objective. Has Crawford ever won more than 34 games in his 6 seasons in the league. It's not really a shock when he is a primary offensive weapon the team loses.

If you could get by an defender at any time, why would you be shooting 40% at 6'5?
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
6/15/2007  10:07 AM
Posted by MS:

Yea because he is never going to be a good player with someone like isiah here, you spoke to a cavs fan, thanks for the inside info, speak to a knicks fan that actually watches this kid. He is good half the time and horrible the other half....

Isiah has given Jamal the green light, to play out of control shoot whenever he wants, and he allows him to play this way while not playing any defense, being careless with the ball and not running the offense. So where is his incentive to get better. I simply stated he could flourish in the right situation which is not with a soft coach that doesn't demand defense.

Getting rid of contracts should be this teams objective. Has Crawford ever won more than 34 games in his 6 seasons in the league. It's not really a shock when he is a primary offensive weapon the team loses.

If you could get by an defender at any time, why would you be shooting 40% at 6'5?

I normally think your rantings about Jamal are ridiculous but this one actually makes sense and I think it's true. Jamal's biggest problem is that he has only had one coach in his life try to actually coach him. The rest have just tried to capitalize on his one on one ability. Unfortunately that doesn't win games. I think under the right mentoring Jamal could have been an all-star at this point in his career. But unfortunately the reality is he still hasn't learned how to play winning basketball. I really wish we'd stop coddling these guys and actually teach them the finer points of winning basketball.
I just hope that people will like me
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/15/2007  10:09 AM
Posted by Michael6835:

How about we just keep him. He is young and has proven that he can hit pressure shots. He makes his mistakes but thats just Jamal. I was speaking to a Cav fan and he said this to me about Jamal. Out of seven games, Jamal will play well in about 5 of those games, the other 2 he will just terrible. That's just Jamal, live with it. He is good talent, you only trade him if you are getting somebody really good in return.

Sometimes you have take a step back and read what your writing. You want to send him to another team where he can flourish and do all these spectacular things and excel. Why do we want to get rid of him when it's clear that he has an upside ? The team is heading is that direction, where ? A direction where he will get open shots, one where he doesn't have to carry a team. My vote is to keep him, unless a franchise talent comes along.

No- he is good to great in 2 out of 10. He is horrid in 3- and the other five he is ok.

He should not be a starter on any NBA team. He would flourish off the bench for a team that doesn't depend on him to produce.

No pressure to perform=less bad shots

when he is having a brick filled game, he goes back to the bench- and he finishes the game 3 for 9 instead of 4 for 24 like he has with us.

And when he is hot a feeling it, where he is unconscious, the team can just let him stay out there.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/15/2007  10:11 AM
Posted by TMS:

trading him is fine with me as long as we get a real quality player in return... i don't give him up for garbage just to unload his contract tho.

I'd rather take a step back, clear his contract- give time to Mardy- or heck, Balkman at the two.

Loose a ton more games the next two years- assuming Isiah doesn't trade our lotto pick away- use those picks to get young talent- and have a chance at getting a superstar in the draft.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
6/15/2007  10:12 AM
Posted by MS:

I am not his biggest fan, but i am not trading him to a team like miami or cleveland because he will flourish next to a superstar that gets him wide open shots.

I would however like him to end up on a good team. Ideal fits would be, the Spurs, Jazz, Lakers in the west. He would get a ton of open shots the offense would not be run through him and he would be a valuable piece because they would have a system for him.

I think the Jazz would be perfect with a low post booz and deron

I don't care if he goes to Cleveland or Miami and helps either Lebron or Wade win a championship- he's not doing it here and he'll probably be retired from the league before we stand a legit chance of winning a championship.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/15/2007  10:20 AM
If Isiah had any clue what he was doing next season he would really look to banish francis and not start jamal. But we are going to have to deal with the same awful rotations again because zeke needs to get get a defender that can't defend and a pg that can't pass.

I look in this draft and i see Tucker and Strawberry who could both be very good defensive players there in the second round. We need to start renting players because you can get rid of them and open up time.

Players need stability, and crawford is an intelligent guy who i believe will listen. But when you play for the most disgraceful organization in the nba its not easy.

Lenny Wilkens, Herb Williams, Larry Brown, Isiah Thomas, Cartwright, Skiles the kid can't find his game because of the turnover in the organizations he played with.....

I watch Crawford and he needs someone that is going to pull him out of the game and say you don't want to play defense you don't play. You took a 3 with 20 on the clock sit down and run the offense. Your shooting more 3's than free throws I am not going to play you.

Right now Jamal is a closer, he comes out of the bullpen for one job and thats to make the big play with 4 minutes left, it does happen more than it doesn't but when your entire worth to a team is those 4 minutes and often times your play is the reason you are in that position your not that valuable......

Trade out of conference, if we learned anything from the Bulls, Magic and Raptors, Isiah has a lot of teams sending him fruit baskets because he is been the most valuable person to each organization
Michael6835
Posts: 21319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/12/2004
Member: #828
6/15/2007  10:37 AM
MS, I mentioned the Cav fan as to provide an insight from an outsider. I am a knick fan and have watched all 82 games of season. I all about Crawfords short comings. I also know about all the games he has helped us win, I also know that had he not gone down with injury, we probably could of won a few more games.

Franco, people like you amaze me. You make blanket statements like I don't care if we suck for 2 more years. Like 2 more years is the magic number for us to turn it around. I love it, when people give me this rebuild talk like that's not what we are doing. Fine you don't like the players we are rebuilding with, but we are rebuilding/retooling. I didn't say trading Crawford was a bad idea, I simply stated I would only trade him if he was part of a package to bring in a "franchise" guy. I am not simply trading him to get rid of his contract. He is not a Steve Francis or a Jerome James or any other high priced player that isn't doing jack for their money. Jamal is at least an active contributor on a this team and responsible for a good chunk of the teams success this season. Grant it 34 wins is nothing special, but it is 10 more than last year. He is good enough to excel everywhere else but here. Players like him, you live with and die with. I have no arguments about his defense, he needs to improve, but he does have some value.
M
Michael6835
Posts: 21319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/12/2004
Member: #828
6/15/2007  10:41 AM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by TMS:

trading him is fine with me as long as we get a real quality player in return... i don't give him up for garbage just to unload his contract tho.

I'd rather take a step back, clear his contract- give time to Mardy- or heck, Balkman at the two.

Loose a ton more games the next two years- assuming Isiah doesn't trade our lotto pick away- use those picks to get young talent- and have a chance at getting a superstar in the draft.

and this super star will all of a sudden make us a title contender ?
Is Lebron going to clone himself or re enter the draft. This whole betting the bank on draft idea is suspect to me.
M
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/15/2007  10:43 AM
Posted by franco12:
Posted by TMS:

trading him is fine with me as long as we get a real quality player in return... i don't give him up for garbage just to unload his contract tho.

I'd rather take a step back, clear his contract- give time to Mardy- or heck, Balkman at the two.

Loose a ton more games the next two years- assuming Isiah doesn't trade our lotto pick away- use those picks to get young talent- and have a chance at getting a superstar in the draft.

if your focus is on clearing contracts & losing a ton of games in the coming seasons, why not go all the way & get rid of Curry, Jamal, Q Rich, & every other veteran w/some trade value for expirings & hope that OJ Mayo or whatever other young up & coming stud prospect is the real deal?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Michael6835
Posts: 21319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/12/2004
Member: #828
6/15/2007  10:48 AM
Posted by MS:

If Isiah had any clue what he was doing next season he would really look to banish francis and not start jamal. But we are going to have to deal with the same awful rotations again because zeke needs to get get a defender that can't defend and a pg that can't pass.

I look in this draft and i see Tucker and Strawberry who could both be very good defensive players there in the second round. We need to start renting players because you can get rid of them and open up time.

Players need stability, and crawford is an intelligent guy who i believe will listen. But when you play for the most disgraceful organization in the nba its not easy.

Lenny Wilkens, Herb Williams, Larry Brown, Isiah Thomas, Cartwright, Skiles the kid can't find his game because of the turnover in the organizations he played with.....

I watch Crawford and he needs someone that is going to pull him out of the game and say you don't want to play defense you don't play. You took a 3 with 20 on the clock sit down and run the offense. Your shooting more 3's than free throws I am not going to play you.

Right now Jamal is a closer, he comes out of the bullpen for one job and thats to make the big play with 4 minutes left, it does happen more than it doesn't but when your entire worth to a team is those 4 minutes and often times your play is the reason you are in that position your not that valuable......

Trade out of conference, if we learned anything from the Bulls, Magic and Raptors, Isiah has a lot of teams sending him fruit baskets because he is been the most valuable person to each organization

I would agree with this assessment with the exception of not totally blaming him for the losing. The team collectively sucked especially in the beginning. Then they started playing .500 ball and everyone looked better, it looked like they were settling down into their roles. The defense is their, we just need to get them to play it for 48 mins. They put themselves down early only to play great d, get back in the game and run out of gas.

I like your closer argument, Jamal is a closer. That is definitely worth something in the NBA, Robert Horry has made his career being a closer. Not everyone can do it, it takes special skill attitude to be able to do it as much as he does.
M
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/15/2007  11:08 AM
If you remember Jamal started to come on strong as the year progressed. He was getting good at attacking the D with his penetration and short runners. Just around the time he went down with his injury. In Jan. and Feb. his game picked up. He avg'd 20.9 pts, 5.4 asts in Jan. The only thing is that he was still having up and down shooting performances. I don't think that Larry's coaching did anything amazing for Jamal. I think Jamal just had a dip in his shooting % this year. He went from 41% to 40% and from 34% to 32% from 3. He got to the line at the rate of 4.5 FTA's per game under Larry and 4.6 under Isiah. Larry gets a lot of credit for the last month when Jamal played well but in truth that is an illusion. He's basicallly the same player he's always been. I had HOPE that he would come in this year and continue what he had done in that last month, but it was only an abberation. He had a good run like many players do in any given season.

So Jamal took fewer shots under Larry. That didn't lead to us being a better offensive team. Jamal is a volume shooter and a streak shooter. You have to kind of live with his low efficiency. I'm hoping that he can get to the point where he's more efficient by penetrating more and taking more 3's when he's set as opposed to when he's on the move. When he get's his feet set he's a MUCH more accurate shooter.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/15/2007  11:24 AM
Live with the volume, just take smart shots, set yourself and do it closer to the basket, make sure if your going to attack your not running into a double screen and starting a fast break.....

He is a mentally weak player you bring him off the bench and he is not the same, his feelings are to easily hurt. His best role for this team is coming off the bench and being the x factor. Collins will play defense and do what he needs to, i fully expect 8pts 5rbs 4ass out of him on a regular basis. I think thats fair. Jamal I would be happy if he was in the 15pt range off the bench kinda like barbosa. Notice how bell starts over him, its about playing the right role. Something isiah hasn't really done. We need a good second unit and if isiah does this we will win a lot more

Crawford
Nate
Balkman
Lee
Frye

Lee obviously won't start but should, but i like him out there providing energy. I don't understand why isiah doesn't put more pressure on the ball he has the athletes to do it. He just needs to use his head and start acting like he knows this game. Which to date he has proven he possesses very little knowledge about brining in the right guys and playing them at the right times. And i think Frye, nate and especially crawford have suffered
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/15/2007  11:27 AM
He is a mentally weak player

completely disagree w/that... he's 1 of the guys who i have confidence in taking big shots & making them... also rarely if ever chokes at the FT line in crunchtime, unlike certain other players we have on this team... Jamal may be a bonehead in his shot selection at times, but 1 thing he is NOT is mentally weak.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
6/15/2007  11:32 AM
he is mentally weak, outside of the last quarter, he makes bonehead decision constantly
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/15/2007  11:35 AM
Posted by MS:

he is mentally weak, outside of the last quarter, he makes bonehead decision constantly

making boneheaded decisions doesn't equate to being mentally weak... it's just bad shot selection... when you say someone's mentally weak, you're implying that he chokes in pressure situations & doesn't want the ball in his hands in crunchtime... at least, that's my definition.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Why would shouldn't trade Jamal Crawford

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy