[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Why do the Knicks Oragnization make David Lee Available?
Author Thread
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
6/10/2007  10:12 PM


Dacid Lee is an amazing talent. He will be a star in this league. He has the drive and intelligence to make it in this league. I think he will be a poor man's Shawn Marion in his prime. So if we are rebuilding then why are we shipping him for players that are good but have a some mileage on their engines. I know this is New York and we love the "Win Now" theme give the city more "acclaim" but I think the Knicks can really be a force 3-4 years from now if they trade absolutely no one of this team.
AUTOADVERT
martin
Posts: 80981
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/10/2007  10:23 PM
we are shipping Lee? wha?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Ira
Posts: 24693
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/10/2007  10:25 PM
You're listening to rumors and speculation and treating them as a done deal.
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
6/10/2007  10:26 PM
In any blockbuster trade we make Lee will be likely included.
martin
Posts: 80981
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
6/10/2007  10:29 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

In any blockbuster trade we make Lee will be likely included.

you gotta give to get. And I think all want ship Channing before Lee obviously.

What superstars are we getting?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/10/2007  10:33 PM
Posted by martin:

we are shipping Lee? wha?

If you were a team like Phoenix who was dangling Marion or Seattle dangling Lewis---who would you as for? The ONLY choice is Lee the pick and Collins. They dont want the vets other than possibly malik to make the $$$ work--so where is the fair value? I'd like to keep our guys and continue to build but I feel a shortcut a comin.
RIP Crushalot😞
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/10/2007  10:37 PM
The idea isn't to stockpile young talent. The idea is the WIN a TITLE! So if you give up some youth in order to get a legit star player that you feel will get you closer to a title that's the whole point. No one really WANTS to give up Lee, but he's a valuable chip and we'd be replacing him with someone who is actually BETTER than he is right now. Is there a chance he may continue to develop to a higher level, yes, but you take the player that actually IS ON that higher level now over just potential.
Ira
Posts: 24693
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
6/10/2007  10:42 PM
I disagree. Lee is already a very good player. In two years, it's likely he'll be a much better player. In two years Marion will be on his way down. Do you think we're going to win a title in the next two years with Shawn Marion instead of David Lee?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
6/10/2007  10:49 PM
Posted by Ira:

I disagree. Lee is already a very good player. In two years, it's likely he'll be a much better player. In two years Marion will be on his way down. Do you think we're going to win a title in the next two years with Shawn Marion instead of David Lee?

Something will happen to wreck the team.

Anyway, the Atlanta Hawks could have given a better account of themselves than the Cavs. The east did sck so badly this year--actually it may have hit it's lowpoint--although Greg oden is also going West. The only thing good about this finals is that it could be over quickly.
RIP Crushalot😞
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
6/10/2007  11:05 PM
BREAKING NEWS: Garnett on the Knicks are not winning a Championship, and even tho I would love him on the knicks neither is Jermaine O'neal. We need to continue develop our young bucks till they become basketball scholars with a P.H.D. in all necessary basketball skills. I don't need any scholars that cannot or will not perform well in the near future. I need some that can do what they got to do and do it for many years to come and give me a reason to watch this team without ****ing cardiac arrest every game in the near future.

"The idea isn't to stockpile young talent. The idea is the WIN a TITLE!". Well cot damn, I think Chicago and Orlando are ****ing up!
rain
Posts: 20762
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/13/2002
Member: #353
USA
6/10/2007  11:42 PM
What are the rumored deals including Lee? His upside, intagibles, and team orientation are very valuable.. it would take alot to include him in any deal. Rashard makes no sense. His knee is balky and his health long term is a serious minus.. plus, he's gonna get a big deal.
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
6/11/2007  1:39 AM
Thats why I am asking this question if we think so highly of Lee, then why every deal I hear has his name in it?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/11/2007  8:06 AM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

Thats why I am asking this question if we think so highly of Lee, then why every deal I hear has his name in it?
He's too versatile for Isiah and Dolan's liking.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
6/11/2007  8:26 AM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

Thats why I am asking this question if we think so highly of Lee, then why every deal I hear has his name in it?

He's playing well, so if we're not trading Curry, he's our only other option to get a decent piece in return. Lee is not going to be a top flight star in this league, as good as he's been, so if you can get one, it's not necessarily a bad move.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
TheGame
Posts: 26657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
6/11/2007  8:29 AM
I don't think that the Knicks are going to trade Lee, unless it is for O' Neal and I think the dislike between IT and Bird is so great that they will not be able to get a deal done. Thus, I think Lee will be here next year. I would really like the Knicks to make a smaller trade of Frye or Nate or both to get Lewis, Diaw, or an extra draft pick. As others have stated, this team is 3 years away from have any real chance of contending for a title and that is assuming Curry, Lee, Balkman, Collins, and Lee continue to substantially improve each year. Thus, we really don't need a Garnett or a O'Neal.
Trust the Process
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
6/11/2007  8:39 AM
From the statements attributed to Isiah it seems like he feels the team is closer to being a contender than 3 years away. It sounds like he thinks the team is maybe a 1 or 2 years away at most, if he can add the right player. That being the case I just get the feeling that Lee is the one guy that will be sacrificed, due to his value right now. I LOVE Lee's game, but I realize that he is the most likely young talent to be used to get another star player. My hope is that Isiah can't get a deal done and we move to try and make a smaller deal for another pick in this draft. Then i'd try to take Sean Williams and Morris Almond. Those 2 guys would set this team up for long term success IMO.
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
6/11/2007  8:41 AM
If you want to know IT opinion for the topick please read nixluva post above...
The biggest problem with Lee on the Knick is reflection
You look at his game and you see right away how bad are all players we have for big $$$
His personality is reflecting the mental deficiences of Steph, Steve, Eddy-alike and at the end...
very clear highlights what IT did as GM - messy crap with Lee as a side-win of his gambling moves.

If IT will stay (and he will) - Lee we go. . And they will find the "right" deal to make it work

[Edited by - arkrud on 06-11-2007 08:42 AM]
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
6/11/2007  8:41 AM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

Thats why I am asking this question if we think so highly of Lee, then why every deal I hear has his name in it?

He's playing well, so if we're not trading Curry, he's our only other option to get a decent piece in return. Lee is not going to be a top flight star in this league, as good as he's been, so if you can get one, it's not necessarily a bad move.

What kind of #s do you think Lee would have put up if he had played 38 mpg?
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
6/11/2007  8:47 AM
Actually talking about JO - the trade including JO and Lee is perfect one to put things in plase.
Apples to Apples and Oranges to Oranges
JO to IT and Lee to Bird.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
6/11/2007  9:17 AM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:

Thats why I am asking this question if we think so highly of Lee, then why every deal I hear has his name in it?

He's playing well, so if we're not trading Curry, he's our only other option to get a decent piece in return. Lee is not going to be a top flight star in this league, as good as he's been, so if you can get one, it's not necessarily a bad move.

What kind of #s do you think Lee would have put up if he had played 38 mpg?

There was a point last season where David Lee was consisently dropping 15pts 15rebs and 3 assist. I don't see a player like that as tradeable.
Why do the Knicks Oragnization make David Lee Available?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy