Posted by knicks1248:
I agree with you bip, but in all reality it should be a game time decision on how many minutes he gets. If steph an JC are playing well, then 10 to 13 minutes sounds about right, and It also should be base on match ups as well.
Most Players usually play well when ther minutest are consistant , and when stephs minutes are sporadic and inconsistant
just like Curry and fry, there games are usually out the window. So i feel that nothing significant should happaen unless force into doing it.
It's a tough balancing act. Before Q went down he was one of our more valuable players, but we've also played well without him. So where does he fit? Who's minutes does he take away? Both him and Nate may steal minutes from guys that actually deserve and need more minutes. I personally would give Q priority over Nate because he gives us things we don't have. He can give us a size advantage in teh backcourt, rebounding from the guard position and an extra perimeter defender up front. As much as I love Nate to me he doesn't provide antyhing more than jamal or Steph. I'm with 1248 I think he will be the one guy that will have to get sporadic minutes so that the rest can get consistent ones. Give him tiem when we need a spark, or someone is tired, or our shots aren't falling. But I can't say he should be guaranteed significant minutes. Someone has to sit. Those 3 and 4 guard line-ups should be erased from memory IMO.
[Edited by - Bippity10 on 01-08-2007 10:06 AM]