[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What's all this Trade Frye/ Frye is the weak link crap?
Author Thread
buddapaw
Posts: 23220
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 2/22/2006
Member: #1101

10/29/2006  10:06 AM
You guys are always talking about Zeke not building towards the future and now you want to get rid of a great young player. For crying out loud the guys seasons ended on a knee injury last year so of course he going to look a little slow coming back from injury. Also it takes time for some players to develop, last pre-season it seemed like he was working on a few things and didn't shoot the ball much. This year he hasn't been getting the benefit of the doubt from the officials, he will be fine. So all you doom and gloomers chill da hell out and let the kid learn. It's not like we have the best big men coach coaching unlike Bynam in LA. so calm down and let the kid play.
"Low Percentage Shots r US, these are our Knicks" "NY KNICKS the cure for basketball fanatic"
AUTOADVERT
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
10/29/2006  10:25 AM
it's a quest to be right first, and the odds tend towards failure.

iheartsfrye
all kool aid all the time.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
10/29/2006  10:27 AM
Also, just wait till Jared Jeffries returns and everyone will see what a difference it makes in team defense. Jeffries will return by December 13th.
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/29/2006  10:34 AM
You guys are always talking about Zeke not building towards the future and now you want to get rid of a great young player. For crying out loud the guys seasons ended on a knee injury last year so of course he going to look a little slow coming back from injury. Also it takes time for some players to develop, last pre-season it seemed like he was working on a few things and didn't shoot the ball much. This year he hasn't been getting the benefit of the doubt from the officials, he will be fine. So all you doom and gloomers chill da hell out and let the kid learn. It's not like we have the best big men coach coaching unlike Bynam in LA. so calm down and let the kid play.

That's what I'm sayin'

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
fishmike
Posts: 53903
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
10/29/2006  10:42 AM
I guess you dont actually read the threads... since your starting a new one let me brief you.

Frye is good, we all like him.
Frye is not a good defender at this point in his career.
Frye is an especially bad defender at the PF, which is not his natural position.
When Frye and Curry are together the defense and rebounding is bad... thus the "weak link" comments.
The suggestion is either move Frye to bench where he's got a better chance of success playing center and PF against opposing bench players.
Curry is a 30 minute a night guy. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Plenty of minutes for Frye off the bench.

OR

Trade him and back an equally good young player that better fits with Curry.

Kinda like the Mike Miller/Drew Gooden trade. It wasnt that the teams didnt like Miller/Gooden, just that the other player was a better fit.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
10/29/2006  10:45 AM
I don't think that anybody is untradeable but I don't think that Frye is a weak link. Especially on a team with Starbury and Stevie Franchise.

I do think that Frye has a limited ceiling and that he's not that far from it. But even then he can be a good player and an asset. He's never going to be a Franchise player or some go to guy night in and night out but he definitely has a role on this team and I think that he'd be unselfish enough to accept it.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
buddapaw
Posts: 23220
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 2/22/2006
Member: #1101

10/29/2006  10:54 AM
Posted by fishmike:

I guess you dont actually read the threads... since your starting a new one let me brief you.

Frye is good, we all like him.
Frye is not a good defender at this point in his career.
Frye is an especially bad defender at the PF, which is not his natural position.
When Frye and Curry are together the defense and rebounding is bad... thus the "weak link" comments.
The suggestion is either move Frye to bench where he's got a better chance of success playing center and PF against opposing bench players.
Curry is a 30 minute a night guy. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Plenty of minutes for Frye off the bench.

OR

Trade him and back an equally good young player that better fits with Curry.

Kinda like the Mike Miller/Drew Gooden trade. It wasnt that the teams didnt like Miller/Gooden, just that the other player was a better fit.



Fish you are proponent of building for the future correct? It is way too early to think about trading him, in essense giving up on him. The D will come he is a hard worker, he will be ok
"Low Percentage Shots r US, these are our Knicks" "NY KNICKS the cure for basketball fanatic"
martin
Posts: 80979
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/29/2006  11:05 AM
Posted by buddapaw:
Posted by fishmike:

I guess you dont actually read the threads... since your starting a new one let me brief you.

Frye is good, we all like him.
Frye is not a good defender at this point in his career.
Frye is an especially bad defender at the PF, which is not his natural position.
When Frye and Curry are together the defense and rebounding is bad... thus the "weak link" comments.
The suggestion is either move Frye to bench where he's got a better chance of success playing center and PF against opposing bench players.
Curry is a 30 minute a night guy. Sometimes more, sometimes less. Plenty of minutes for Frye off the bench.

OR

Trade him and back an equally good young player that better fits with Curry.

Kinda like the Mike Miller/Drew Gooden trade. It wasnt that the teams didnt like Miller/Gooden, just that the other player was a better fit.



Fish you are proponent of building for the future correct? It is way too early to think about trading him, in essense giving up on him. The D will come he is a hard worker, he will be ok

no one is arguing with you that Frye will be OK, he probably will, but are he and Curry right for each other long term. The suggestion is that they are not.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Allanfan20
Posts: 36013
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
10/29/2006  11:06 AM
Buddapaw, nobody is giving up on him. What most of us think is that Frye doesn't do that well at PF b/c guys at that position are much quicker and more versataile. Frye is mainly a low post defender and is very much a mechanical player. Perfect for the center position. He's also NOT a shotblocker. He doesn't have the help instincts and he's not quite athletic enough.

But if we want to see the Knicks to get off to better starts, then either put Frye or Curry on the bench and make Lee the starter, oorrrrr, trade Frye or Curry for a shotblocker. This isn't a knock on Frye. This isn't giving up on him. This is doing what's best for the Knicks. Curry and Frye will never be a good defensive frontcourt.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Killa4luv
Posts: 27774
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/29/2006  11:06 AM
I started a trade thread with Frye because I was bored as hell on a saturday night. Nothing more. I love the kid. I can't forget how tough he played last year and how incredibly impressed with him I was. I haven't given up on him in the least. I think he can be exactly what we need. He'll probably never be quick, but i think he will learn to rebound and defend well. He's strong, hes definitely not soft, and he is a hard worker.
Silverfuel
Posts: 31750
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 6/27/2002
Member: #268
USA
10/29/2006  11:14 AM
Posted by martin:

no one is arguing with you that Frye will be OK, he probably will, but are he and Curry right for each other long term. The suggestion is that they are not.
Maybe he isn't but we should wait a few before we decide to trade him or call him the weak link. As a matter of fact IMO, calling someone the weak link says they wont be OK. I think Lee would be better next to Curry. I agree with you, fishmike, nyk4ever etc that Lee's rebounding and help D is a perfect compliment but we are speculating. I think the argument is we should wait and see. What if Frye works out? If he doesn't, bring him off the bench. Whatever is best for the team.

[Edited by - Silverfuel on 10-29-2006 11:15 AM]
A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.
Bobby
Posts: 22094
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/18/2003
Member: #408
USA
10/29/2006  11:22 AM
......thats all it is preseason crap. and when the next trade dont work out some genius will remind us how chemistry is suppose to work
"Like they always say, New York is the Mecca of basketball,"I read that in Michael Jordan books my whole life and I played here in the Big East tournament, so it's always fun to play in the Mecca of basketball."---Rip Hamilton
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
10/29/2006  11:31 AM
lee can't guard upper tier PF's OR C's.

Snap out of it.
all kool aid all the time.
SugarRayRichardson
Posts: 21557
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/28/2006
Member: #1169

10/29/2006  11:34 AM
Bring in a real big mans coach to work with Frye and Curry. Isiah is afraid of any competition so he doesnt want Oakley or Patrick brought in.
I LOVED how Curry just exploded in the 4th, speaking as a fan of the Raptors, Curry looked well, scary I think is the word. Or Shaq-like Curry: 19.1ppg-7.3rpg-58%fg
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/29/2006  11:36 AM
no one is arguing with you that Frye will be OK, he probably will, but are he and Curry right for each other long term. The suggestion is that they are not.

Sounds like giving up to me.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
10/29/2006  11:38 AM
Same doods who preach patience ain't got none...

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
martin
Posts: 80979
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
10/29/2006  12:04 PM
Posted by SugarRayRichardson:

Bring in a real big mans coach to work with Frye and Curry. Isiah is afraid of any competition so he doesnt want Oakley or Patrick brought in.

what makes you say that?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
joec32033
Posts: 30641
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
10/29/2006  12:41 PM
Posted by Silverfuel:
Posted by martin:

no one is arguing with you that Frye will be OK, he probably will, but are he and Curry right for each other long term. The suggestion is that they are not.
Maybe he isn't but we should wait a few before we decide to trade him or call him the weak link. As a matter of fact IMO, calling someone the weak link says they wont be OK. I think Lee would be better next to Curry. I agree with you, fishmike, nyk4ever etc that Lee's rebounding and help D is a perfect compliment but we are speculating. I think the argument is we should wait and see. What if Frye works out? If he doesn't, bring him off the bench. Whatever is best for the team.

[Edited by - Silverfuel on 10-29-2006 11:15 AM]

If we were just gonna throw our top 5 players on the court to start, we'd suck. I would just like to see Isiah put Frye or Curry on the bench(preferably Curry because Frye has at least shown he is capable of working) in favor of Lee at PF until they prove they can do what they need to do.
~You can't run from who you are.~
nyk4ever
Posts: 41012
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/29/2006  12:45 PM
Posted by joec32033:



If we were just gonna throw our top 5 players on the court to start, we'd suck. I would just like to see Isiah put Frye or Curry on the bench(preferably Curry because Frye has at least shown he is capable of working) in favor of Lee at PF until they prove they can do what they need to do.

Thats a good idea Joe. Making Eddy earn the keys to the starting lineup could be a good way to get him to start busting his ass and make him a better player. I doubt Curry has ever had to work for anything, he was handed a ton of money at a young age and didn't even have to work in highschool because of his size. Lets make him work for something and see if it doesn't make him a better player and player that works hard all the time.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
buddapaw
Posts: 23220
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 2/22/2006
Member: #1101

10/29/2006  12:51 PM
Everyone is basing these assumptions on the preseason which Frye sucked at last year too. Curry and Frye hardly had a chance to play together because of you know who. He probably be further along if he got what he deserved. He was the best PF in NY last year but was not treated like it. He is about to start his second year and if you think we should trade him that means that you gave up on him you can't have it both ways , it's one way or the other. So you say he is good but not good for the team so let's trade him. He probably be ROY if it wasn't for CP and LB he was that good. So stop talking out both sides of your mouths and manup trading Frye is giving up on him.
"Low Percentage Shots r US, these are our Knicks" "NY KNICKS the cure for basketball fanatic"
What's all this Trade Frye/ Frye is the weak link crap?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy