I disagree, I think that to start off a game, every player should be a threat to score the ball, and curry and frye give us that best chance.
Score the ball with no defense and rebounding. With no defense and rebounding, our scoring is kept in check. That spells 23 win seasons.
Frye was pretty good in college when used properly, I see no reason to give up on him based on what you saw last year.
Who said I was giving up on him? I love the guy just as much as the next and think he'll be an all star if he works on it enough. I have faith he can get good on the defense and rebounding, but right now, he sucks in those 2 categories.
I prefer lee coming off the bench and injecting instant energy...but I have to agree with panos that he COULD be a GOOD fit as a starting PF, but Frye is waaaaay better than him.
Based on what? Frye is a way better scorer but Lee is a way better rebounder. Lee is actually better at doing things like passing the ball, believe it or not. They are both kinda crappy on defense. Why am I even comparing the 2 though. Am I not allowed to love them both?
The fact that 23 players were drafted between lee and frye should tell you something.
What does that have to do with anything?
when larry brown puts you in the game and says rebounding is all I care about, lee is the man, but in terms of starting, frye hands down.
Lee is more than a rebounder but read the above post. Plus all I said was that Lee is a better fit for this team starting. If we had a guy like Ben Wallace was on our team and not Curry, then I say start Frye.
remember that thing I said about getting a grip?
No cause I don't care. When I read comments like that, I realize you're immature and maybe barely 8 years old. Is that ignore feature here yet?
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
