[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks mulled Webber deal
Author Thread
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/16/2006  10:14 AM
Chris Webber, still hampered by the aftermath of microfracture knee surgery at 33, is due more than $42 million over the next two seasons -- a perfect fit for the Knicks' seemingly infinite budget.

The five-time All-Star could also fit the win-or-else mandate president/coach Isiah Thomas faces this season, but initial discussions haven't produced a fit to send Webber to New York.


Still, the 76ers have approached the Knicks (and anyone else willing to listen) about Webber, league sources say, but weren't offered enough to make the kind of deal they've sought to shake up things this summer after several Allen Iverson scenarios fell through.

The package offered by Thomas, who is on vacation this week and could not be reached Tuesday, starts with Quentin Richardson (with his back issues and $33.8 million over four seasons left on his contract) and Maurice Taylor (whose $9.75 million contract expires after this season).

For the necessary salary-cap match, the Knicks would have to send more to Philadelphia to take on the $20 million Webber makes next season. So they'd likely try to include another albatross salary, such as the two years and $13.7 million owed to Philadelphia native Malik Rose or the four years and $24 million still due to Jerome James.

Webber-to-the-Knicks talk, however, is nothing new as he's been on their radar screen since before he re-signed as a free agent with Sacramento five years ago.

Last season, he averaged 20.2 points and 9.9 rebounds in 75 games as the Sixers failed to make the playoffs in his and Iverson's first full season together. Thus, team president Billy King has vowed to change the Sixers' culture.

He couldn't complete deals that would have sent Iverson to Boston, Denver or Atlanta, so now he's looking to move Webber, who turns 34 in March. And although Webber's knee severely limits his mobility, in New York he would join Eddy Curry and Channing Frye in a three-man rotation at power forward and center.

If the Sixers and Knicks can make a match, that is, or King can't find a better offer elsewhere.

ROBINSON'S DEAL OFFICIAL: The Nets officially re-signed soon-to-be 40-year-old big man Clifford Robinson to a $1.5 million deal for this season and a partially guaranteed option for 2007-08. Once former Phoenix guard Eddie House passes his physical later this week, they expect to finalize his one-year $1.5 million deal.

The signing and buyout of big man Mile Ilic, however, likely won't take place until after this month's world championship tournament in which he's playing for Serbia and Montenegro, team officials and Ilic's agent said.

E-mail: adamek@northjersey.com

http://www.northjersey.com/page.php?qstr=eXJpcnk3ZjczN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXkxMjcmZmdiZWw3Zjd2cWVlRUV5eTY5NzYzNTEmeXJpcnk3ZjcxN2Y3dnFlZUVFeXk2
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
AUTOADVERT
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
8/16/2006  10:16 AM
Would have been nice if Isiah was able to land Webber. King1 is one hell of a good source for information.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/16/2006  10:22 AM
a deal of Mo T, Q Rich & either Malik or Big Turd for CWebb? that woulda been a helluva steal for the Knicks, & would have opened up 2 roster spots... too bad it didn't go through.

woulda been nice to see a team like:

C - Curry / Frye
PF - Webber / Lee
SF - Jefferies / Balkman / Jalen
SG - Francis / Crawford
PG - Marbury / Nate / Collins
IR - Malik or Big Turd / Qyntel
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
8/16/2006  10:23 AM
I dont know what to think about that. Doing a 3 for 1 would clearly get some roster space, and getting webber instead of JJames and taylor is hardly a bad deal.

but webber needs the ball to be effective and has a tendency to slow games, doesn't bode well with what we're trying to do, does it ?
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
8/16/2006  10:24 AM
wouldn't mind that deal at all - we aren't under the cap next year anyway, but if we get rid of Q and/or jerome james for a contract expiring in 2 years, we'll be doing a better job of cap management. Webber's also still a good player and would probably be our best passing forward - that would help out curry and frye's development a lot
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/16/2006  10:27 AM
Posted by raven:

I dont know what to think about that. Doing a 3 for 1 would clearly get some roster space, and getting webber instead of JJames and taylor is hardly a bad deal.

but webber needs the ball to be effective and has a tendency to slow games, doesn't bode well with what we're trying to do, does it ?


Mo T, Malik & Big Turd dont' exactly spur quick crisp ball movement either... CWebb's still 1 of the best passing bigmen in the game... would take a lot of pressure off our ballhandlers on the perimeter to have a guy in the post who knows what to do w/the ball once he gets it.

[Edited by - TMS on 08-16-2006 10:27 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
knicksbabyyeah
Posts: 21472
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 8/19/2001
Member: #100
Netherlands
8/16/2006  10:27 AM
Q + Mo + JJames for CWebb?

Clears glut, could mean we'd sign Q2 and/or Paul Miller. They would save on luxury tax next year, while we would svae more money in 2 yrs (as we'd be sending more years back in Q and JJ)

sign me up.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/16/2006  10:33 AM
Webber is a good guy, he's played on a lot of winning teams. He's got a good attitude and we have the depth to back up the 20 games a year he usually misses. He's still a very solid rebounder, especially on the defensive glass, something we need. He's also still a fabulous passer, and can help move the ball around and make good outlet passes off the defensive glass.

I think dumping Jerome James on Phili isnt realistic, but Malik Rose and Francis are. Rose and Francis straight up works... I would take that.

I think there's zero chance of trading JJFat or Q right now.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
8/16/2006  10:36 AM
Posted by TMS:
Posted by raven:

I dont know what to think about that. Doing a 3 for 1 would clearly get some roster space, and getting webber instead of JJames and taylor is hardly a bad deal.

but webber needs the ball to be effective and has a tendency to slow games, doesn't bode well with what we're trying to do, does it ?


Mo T, Malik & Big Turd dont' exactly spur quick crisp ball movement either... C

[Edited by - TMS on 08-16-2006 10:27 AM]

I agree but those guys don't play that much... web would need some playing time that would be substracted to frye.

my question is, seeing where we "headed" (youth movement), are we interested in bringing that kind fo guy ?

please ntoe that Im' not opposed to do it, I'm jsut covering all options.

Clearing roster space would be nice though.
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
8/16/2006  10:37 AM
If this were earlier in his contract, I'd say hell no, but if it's for those contracts and since he has 2 years left, I'd say yes. Plus, Webber would be a nice player/ leader/ role model to help us get back on our feet. Very very good chemistry leader.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
raven
Posts: 22454
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #316
Canada
8/16/2006  10:39 AM
So why did we refuse in that case if we all agree it's a good move ?

is there anything we ignore there ?
lovespree
Posts: 20310
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/1/2001
Member: #53
USA
8/16/2006  10:39 AM
I'll just post my reply here:

I personally wouldn't mind it if we were giving up losers like James and Malik Rose. The sad thing is that we are always coveting stars when they are stars but we don't end up getting them until they are either injured (i.e. LJ, McDyess, etc) or past their prime and aren't as good(Jalen Rose, Mark Jackson) or the ones that just start to suck when they get here (Steve Francis & Stephon Marbuy). Steve & Stephon always torched us when we played against them but know that they are Knicks they aren't torching anybody!! This isn't fair!
NY KNICKS 4 EVER! Will we ever find players like Anthony Mason, Xavier McDaniels, Patrick Ewing again? I hope so.
nyballer
Posts: 21019
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/4/2001
Member: #108
USA
8/16/2006  10:55 AM
the sixers probably wanted something like mo taylor and jalen rose for webber, or some sort of deal with shorter contracts - isiah probably countered with mo taylor Q and james, which they obviously refused. i wouldn't mind if isiah moved taylor and one of either Q/James, with malik rose. philly takes on q's contract for 4 years, but they lose some salary sooner in the short run.
"easy like sunday morning..." - walt clyde
MS
Posts: 27064
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
8/16/2006  10:59 AM
Lets be realistic here, Philly is not taking the deal just to get rid of Webber......why would they take on more salary and two extra players......

Something a little more realistic would be Webber and Kevin Ollie for Jalen Rose and Q; because they do clear some cap for next season......

Since our cap is screwed anyway we can take on another deal while getting rid of Q, and helping our cap get in the right place in a few years......

Curry/Frye
Webber/Lee
Jefferies/Balkman
Francis/Crawford
Marbury Nate

there are worse thing out there and i would make us a better team, however I would rather see webber and frye out there at the same timea and really space the floor
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
8/16/2006  11:06 AM
Posted by nyballer:

the sixers probably wanted something like mo taylor and jalen rose for webber, or some sort of deal with shorter contracts - isiah probably countered with mo taylor Q and james, which they obviously refused. i wouldn't mind if isiah moved taylor and one of either Q/James, with malik rose. philly takes on q's contract for 4 years, but they lose some salary sooner in the short run.


that's probably exactly what happened... i would just stand pat than to give up expirings only for CWebb... the only attractive part of a deal for CWebb would be to unload a longterm contract like Q Rich, Francis, JTurd or Malik.

[Edited by - TMS on 08-16-2006 11:07 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
colorfl1
Posts: 20781
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/6/2004
Member: #731
Canada
8/16/2006  11:11 AM
That is an amazing deal, just in the fact that it removes a lump of medocrity on our roster and opens up spots to sign upside projects...
it would also remove a lot of players that would be souring on the bench because of insufficient palying time.

If Philly does that deal, they are insane... they would be taking on long term salary commitments and a pack of lackluster players for the sake of shaking things up...

Is Q really worth that for them?
wsdm
Posts: 20803
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2006
Member: #1167

8/16/2006  11:11 AM
I'm not a big Webber fan but if the team can get him just by sending some junk to Philly, you can't turn down the deal. The offer Isiah made would have been a huge steal for us.
www.selltheknicks.com----No more DOLANOMICS!
n24d30
Posts: 20279
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/9/2006
Member: #1165

8/16/2006  11:26 AM
I've been saying to keep the team as is for now and to see what we have here but if we have the ability to do a 3 for 1 trade we almost have to do it! AS LONG AS THEY ARE NOT OUR EXPIRING DEALS!I think Webber would be wonderful in the offense Isiah plans to run! He is one of the best passing big men in the game! I can see him in the high post feeding Craw, Stevie, and Steph going backdoor all day!
jskinny35
Posts: 21649
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #928
USA
8/16/2006  11:39 AM
How about one of these deals (since Phi would be stupid to take anything less). Would you do either of these?? Remember although Phi appears to want to dump Webber - they have to get something for him

1)Webber and Olie for Francis and Q.Rich?
2)Webber, Dalembert and Olie for Francis, Q.Rich, Mo Taylor and N.Robinson?

I would prefer scenario 1, but would probably do 2 even though I would prefer not to give up N.Robinson (maybe swap a #1 protected top 20 pick or something)
wsdm
Posts: 20803
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/16/2006
Member: #1167

8/16/2006  11:44 AM
Certainly Philly realizes that pairing Francis with Iverson is an awful combination. (It's about as bad as pairing Francis with Marbury! ) I can't see them wanting Steve.
www.selltheknicks.com----No more DOLANOMICS!
Knicks mulled Webber deal

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy