[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

how to defend and play the Knicks
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/6/2006  1:36 PM
Pack it in, they have no shooters. Marbury's legs were weak on his jumper last year, he had trouble shooting the 3 pt shot. Francis cant shoot it and while Frye can, Ill give him his 16 footers to keep him out of the lane. Jefferies is a weak link here, he cant shoot, he is really only adept at dunking the ball--never seen a 6-11 player blow so many give me's. Get Curry tired, move the pace, ---on the offense is open lanes de jour. Ill start by going inside at Curry and then pick my poison because I know I can shoot over the guards and they have little lateral quickness. No shot blocking--go inside out. Move my guys into Frye and Jefferies, Frye is questionable in the toughness dept as is JJ. Curry is just dumb and slow to move his feet. Francis and Marbury terrible first line of defense i can score over post up or go around either of them.
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
8/6/2006  1:58 PM
to be fair Crawford and Nate are pretty solid shooters. I know Q is a volume guy but I have to think a couple of these guys can shoot through that. Scoring isnt this teams problem, defending and rebounding is. If you crash the boards and keep attacking Curry, Frye or whoever else is defending your best post player you will be just fine.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
NYKniCksFan87
Posts: 22170
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #700
8/6/2006  2:02 PM
bRIGGS, ive honestly had enough with your rants, let the season play out before you predict any of this occuring, i mad a thread talking about lets not get carried away thinking we're a good team, but your doing the opposite, and i guarantee you wouldnt be able to get past steph and francis in a pickup game.

You question fryes toughness when last year over and over again the man would play it up with the big men of other teams and wasnt afraid of contact...

im tired of hearing ur crap because it spews negativity, im on the fence this year concerning this year and im not predicting good or bad, before you come with your outlandish conclusions why dont we let the team play one game before seeing if any of your "prophecies" occur
''We don't have the luxury to take anybody lightly,'' New York's Quentin Richardson said. ''We're not that good.''
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
8/6/2006  2:04 PM
Until the team proves otherwise, scoring definitely is a problem. New York was 24th (out of 30) last season in points per possession, due mostly to poor eFG% (22nd) and absolutely horrible ballhandling (30th). On the bright side, though, the Knicks were 4th in offensive rebounding % and the very best at getting to the line. Mostly what needs to happen is the turnovers need to go way down, but I think they will go down at least somewhat with a more consistent rotation and a more natural offense (bring back the pick and roll).
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/6/2006  2:17 PM
Those turnovers were a nightmare! To me that is the very key to wins and loses.
I'll never trust this' team again.
TheGame
Posts: 26652
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
8/6/2006  2:20 PM
Our offense was terrible last year b/c LB only likes to run a half-court offense, and this team is full of players built to run and gun. We need to pick up the pace of the offense and let these guys do what they do naturally. I think IT's offense will produce a higher FG% and better results.
Trust the Process
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/6/2006  2:34 PM
I got a very good feeling that IT is going to let them run. That's were the strength of our youth and athleticism will come in. Just thinking about it, I can't wait.
I'll never trust this' team again.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/6/2006  2:59 PM
Ridiculous. Frye is one of the best shooting big men in the league. Marbury has never shot below 45% as a Knick, and his EFG on jumpers alone is 45%. Crawford's EFG on jumps is 47% and both guys can create their own shot or create shots for others. Both are also among the top tier in penetrating and creating for themselves or others. Even David Lee has a 44% EFG on strictly jump shots.

Qrich, Jalen and Francis aren't exactly scrubs at when it comes to shooting either.

In the post Curry, Frye and even Lee and QRich are dangerous weapons. The team is loaded with passers and ballhandlers: Marbury, Francis, Crawford, Robinson, Balkman, Lee, Jefferies, Collins.

Give me a break.
¿ △ ?
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/6/2006  3:08 PM
Posted by NYKniCksFan87:

bRIGGS, ive honestly had enough with your rants, let the season play out before you predict any of this occuring, i mad a thread talking about lets not get carried away thinking we're a good team, but your doing the opposite, and i guarantee you wouldnt be able to get past steph and francis in a pickup game.

You question fryes toughness when last year over and over again the man would play it up with the big men of other teams and wasnt afraid of contact...

im tired of hearing ur crap because it spews negativity, im on the fence this year concerning this year and im not predicting good or bad, before you come with your outlandish conclusions why dont we let the team play one game before seeing if any of your "prophecies" occur

I'll rant until I see definitive changes in this organization. This is a team that is full of excuses and I don't come from that school. I keep hearing from people--don't worry about the money, it isn't yours. Well, yeah it is a key indicator that things are going as poorly as can be. There are two sport teams that have led the league in payroll and came up with such drastically poor results--the two teams owned by Cablevision. The Knicks don't have a Jagr and they also don't have a Lundquist to change things around. They don't have that one player, or combination of guys that I see chnaging things around any time soon. With the 500 MILLION $ Isiah has spent, the unbelievable advantagehe has on every team in this league, I'll gripe, btch and moan until I see something in terms of material change.
Please just skip my posts.
RIP Crushalot😞
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/6/2006  3:09 PM
Okay Crzymdups, very well said. So our only problems that have questions on them is our turnover ratio, our defensive along with shot blociking and maybe an improvement on rebouding. At least we have something to start with. If we can accmplish just one of those things, then we'll be in good shape.

[Edited by - 4949 on 08-06-2006 3:10 PM]

[Edited by - 4949 on 08-06-2006 3:11 PM]
I'll never trust this' team again.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/6/2006  3:14 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by NYKniCksFan87:

bRIGGS, ive honestly had enough with your rants, let the season play out before you predict any of this occuring, i mad a thread talking about lets not get carried away thinking we're a good team, but your doing the opposite, and i guarantee you wouldnt be able to get past steph and francis in a pickup game.

You question fryes toughness when last year over and over again the man would play it up with the big men of other teams and wasnt afraid of contact...

im tired of hearing ur crap because it spews negativity, im on the fence this year concerning this year and im not predicting good or bad, before you come with your outlandish conclusions why dont we let the team play one game before seeing if any of your "prophecies" occur

I'll rant until I see definitive changes in this organization. This is a team that is full of excuses and I don't come from that school. I keep hearing from people--don't worry about the money, it isn't yours. Well, yeah it is a key indicator that things are going as poorly as can be. There are two sport teams that have led the league in payroll and came up with such drastically poor results--the two teams owned by Cablevision. The Knicks don't have a Jagr and they also don't have a Lundquist to change things around. They don't have that one player, or combination of guys that I see chnaging things around any time soon. With the 500 MILLION $ Isiah has spent, the unbelievable advantagehe has on every team in this league, I'll gripe, btch and moan until I see something in terms of material change.
Please just skip my posts.


He is right about one thing. The money. And I think Briggs should be able to moan if he wants to. A good season will turn that around. We will be calling him Sggirb soon enough.
I'll never trust this' team again.
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
8/6/2006  3:19 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

I'll gripe, btch and moan
Please just skip my posts.

People will rant, gripe, btch and moan about your posts as long as you continue to beat your Johnny One Note routine into the ground. If you don't like it, please just skip their posts. Or better yet, please just stop posting.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/6/2006  3:20 PM
Posted by 4949:

Okay Crzymdups, very well said. So our only problems that have questions on them is our turnover ratio, our defensive along with shot blociking and maybe an improvement on rebouding. At least we have something to start with. If we can accmplish just one of those things, then we'll be in good shape.

I think the turnovers problem was caused by two things - 10 new players last year and Larry Brown's offense. When Marbury was trying to run Larry's offense, it was disastrous. When he played his game, we had around 10 or 12 turnovers. This year we have only three new players and hopefully a little more continuity.

The shotblocking is still a problem, obviously, but if Frye and Jefferies are our starting forwards that's two guys who can block some shots. Balkman and Curry are also shotblockers. I think that area can improve slightly this year with the addition of Balkman and Jefferies and more PT for Frye. Though, it's clearly not an area of strength, I think Frye, Jefferies and Balkman will block more shots than Jalen, Mo Taylor and Malik. Balkman and Jefferies are two guys who in 30mpg are going to get you at least one block and one steal apiece.

To me, the big issue with the team is still designing an offense and defense that allow Frye and Curry to be on the floor together. We have to determine if those two can play together. I said that at the beginning of last season and we rarely saw them on the floor together. I hope we'll see some zone defense to take advantage of our length and speed and guys like Jefferies and Balkman who can create problems in a zone. Crawford and Nate, to me, seem like they would be suited to a zone. I hope we use our depth and team speed to run other teams ragged. We'll see.

[Edited by - crzymdups on 06-08-2006 3:21 PM]
¿ △ ?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
8/6/2006  3:21 PM
We have to do more starphucking to satisfy some fans. More steve Francis's. More Darius Miles's.
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/6/2006  3:41 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by 4949:

Okay Crzymdups, very well said. So our only problems that have questions on them is our turnover ratio, our defensive along with shot blociking and maybe an improvement on rebouding. At least we have something to start with. If we can accmplish just one of those things, then we'll be in good shape.

I think the turnovers problem was caused by two things - 10 new players last year and Larry Brown's offense. When Marbury was trying to run Larry's offense, it was disastrous. When he played his game, we had around 10 or 12 turnovers. This year we have only three new players and hopefully a little more continuity.

The shotblocking is still a problem, obviously, but if Frye and Jefferies are our starting forwards that's two guys who can block some shots. Balkman and Curry are also shotblockers. I think that area can improve slightly this year with the addition of Balkman and Jefferies and more PT for Frye. Though, it's clearly not an area of strength, I think Frye, Jefferies and Balkman will block more shots than Jalen, Mo Taylor and Malik. Balkman and Jefferies are two guys who in 30mpg are going to get you at least one block and one steal apiece.

To me, the big issue with the team is still designing an offense and defense that allow Frye and Curry to be on the floor together. We have to determine if those two can play together. I said that at the beginning of last season and we rarely saw them on the floor together. I hope we'll see some zone defense to take advantage of our length and speed and guys like Jefferies and Balkman who can create problems in a zone. Crawford and Nate, to me, seem like they would be suited to a zone. I hope we use our depth and team speed to run other teams ragged. We'll see.

[Edited by - crzymdups on 06-08-2006 3:21 PM]


I can't see Jalen, Mo and Taylor playing more minutes then the guys you just mentioned. I definately see Curry and Frye on the floor together many times this coming season. The nice thing about this year, that I can see so far is, we have many more options out there, many more weapons and they will all be hungry, looking for those minutes to prove. This is the nice thing. They all will want to prove themselves, because they are young and they know the opportunities exist to build on, when the established contract times come a knocking on the door for each of them. The more I look at the possibilities here, the less Marbury is going to be a factor on this team, regarding personal problems. I think this year, certain truths are going to be exposed and if IT is real smart, he will deal with those immediately, because he knows it's his neck this year. But I'm thinking that it may not get to that point, but we'll all have to wait and see. I think it's fair to say that there will be a lot more consistency this year, because people will have a lot more opportunity to establish themselves consistently. How do you know this? IT's style is the opposite of what Brown goes about doing and that is 'sacrificing the first season' to work out the bugs. I'm willing say that I think Brown worked out the bugs, but at his own cost and now Zeke should be able to run a smooth transition with this team, excuse me, this young experienced team, as Knick players. That may sound a little too optimistic, but I can't see too much wrong at this point, now that things have changed. We got to give them benefit of the doubt.
I'll never trust this' team again.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
8/6/2006  3:53 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

We have to do more starphucking to satisfy some fans. More steve Francis's. More Darius Miles's.

yeah, the fact that Briggs basically demanded the Steve Francis trade and said this organization was a bunch of idiots if they didn't get him and then hated the Jefferies trade for its lack of fiscal sanity doesn't add up to me.

Now Briggs wants Darius Miles? Darius and Steve? Wow. It'd be hard to think of two bigger headcases. At some point you have to factor in chemistry/personalities. Aside from Francis and Mo Taylor, I like the mix of guys we have on this team.
¿ △ ?
4949
Posts: 29378
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/25/2006
Member: #1126
USA
8/6/2006  4:30 PM
Really, including Marbury?
I'll never trust this' team again.
NYKniCksFan87
Posts: 22170
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #700
8/6/2006  5:30 PM
you dont get what i mean, i meant the spewing of negativity needs to stop and so does everyone whos being positive.

This tema has nothing the past 5-6 years to prove to anyone anything, all im saying is that we need to reserve judgement until we see them on the floor this year
''We don't have the luxury to take anybody lightly,'' New York's Quentin Richardson said. ''We're not that good.''
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
8/6/2006  5:35 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Bonn1997:

We have to do more starphucking to satisfy some fans. More steve Francis's. More Darius Miles's.

yeah, the fact that Briggs basically demanded the Steve Francis trade and said this organization was a bunch of idiots if they didn't get him and then hated the Jefferies trade for its lack of fiscal sanity doesn't add up to me.

Now Briggs wants Darius Miles? Darius and Steve? Wow. It'd be hard to think of two bigger headcases. At some point you have to factor in chemistry/personalities. Aside from Francis and Mo Taylor, I like the mix of guys we have on this team.

Yeah, Id take Steve Francis again for that deal. If we really wanted Trevor Ariza back, we couldve had him[obviously they didnt] I think Steve is a BIG key to whether or not this reclimation works. If we can actually get into high tempo stuff, then you will see Francis's value shoot right back up because he's built to be a racehorse. I really do believe that Steve Francis might be the KEY player in a material turnaround.

Would I take Darius Miles for Q yes, yes yes. what am i giving up? a 37% shooting 2 G for a player who fits with a high tempo system?

I havent bashed Steve Francis once because i know that he is an upper echlon talent--just needs to be in the right spot. If it was ME, Id start Jamal Steve and Marbury with Lee and Curry with Frye Darius Miles Jalen Rose and Marcus Williams off the bench hey wait a second:(
RIP Crushalot😞
Elite
Posts: 26372
Alba Posts: 23
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #510

8/6/2006  5:44 PM
briggs are you even a knicks fan? u post nothing but negativity
how to defend and play the Knicks

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy