Posted by TheGame:
However, since I don't know the situation, I am going to assume that his friends and relatives are doing what they are paid to do.
What would make you assume automatically that they are doing what they are paid to do when you just said you don't know about the situation? Wouldn't it be just as easy to say "I don't know the situation so I'm going to assume they are not doing what they are being paid to do"
Look at these college athletes. Almost once a week you see players getting suspended by the NCAA because boosters set them up with these ridiculous jobs where players continually makeup hours that they work when they aren't even at the job. It's called a "no-show" job, the guy will show up for 5 hours for the week and report he worked 40 for the week, instead.
I'm not saying this is happening here, but I wouldn't be surprised and I also wouldn't say that since I don't know the situation that I will automatically assume that they are doing what they are paid to do. That would be extremely naive.
[Edited by - nyk4ever on 08-03-2006 4:56 PM]