[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Long Overdue: The Case for Starting Frye over Mo Taylor
Author Thread
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  8:40 PM
other than the fact that Mo stinks and his only defense is drawing a charge and his offense really isn't as good as Frye's, here's some stats:

Turnovers per 48min:
MoT: 4.0
Frye: 3.0
aren't TOs one of our big problems? Frye protects the ball better, not a lot, but one turnover less would be a start.

Blocks per 48:
MoT: .62
Frye: 1.48
Frye is by far the superior shotblocker and would help in a department where we are awful.

Points per 48:
MoT: 18.8
Frye: 25.5
Frye is clearly the superior scorer, both shoot about 50%, but Frye has a more versatile game and gets to the FT line, averaging 7.2 attempts per 48 compared to 3.2 attempts per 48 for Mo, a guy who is supposedly an interior scorer.

Rebounds per 48:
MoT:9.2
Frye: 10.8
Curry isn't the best rebounder at center, he's certainly solid, but wouldn't it make sense to put a guy out there who can help him on the boards?

Fouls per 48:
MoT: 7.2
Frye: 5.8
Mo averages an astonishing 7.2 fouls per 48 minutes! That's awful for a starter, and fouls are one of our big problems too, putting teams at the stripe early in the quarter has been our undoing many a time. I've said before MoT's only defense is drawing a charge, but he gets that call maybe 50% of the time at best, so it's either a good play or two points.

Frye is clearly our future, but he's also making a damn good case that he's our present as well. He's the better scorer, rebounder, shotblocker, defender and he takes care of the ball better. Also, this is purely anecdotal, but when things start going bad, aka teams on 9-0 runs against or whatever, Mo T is the first guy who points fingers at other players on blown defensive assignments. He's not a veteran leader, he's a finger-pointer. He has this negative energy about him on the court that seems to kind get worse when they are playing badly.

Start Frye. Bring Lee off the bench behind him. Lee is at 14pts per48 and 14reb per48 and only 2 Turnovers per 48. He is a more active defender than Mo, a better rebounder by FAR, the team plays well when he's out there, and he hustles and plays with heart. Mo T knows all about playing on losing teams, he seems to know TOO well. Lee and Frye hate losing and play like it.


[Edited by - crzymdups on 02-06-2006 8:44 PM]
¿ △ ?
AUTOADVERT
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/6/2006  8:45 PM
Agreed; it's not even close.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
2/6/2006  8:48 PM
comparing the per 48 minutes stats of a aguy who plays 17 minutes vs a guy who plays 27 minuts is very biased and imbalanced. You just got on dj on the Paul thread about this.

How about you do the comparison based on when both guys get 25 minutes a night. nba.com has the game by game statlines. What are Mo Taylors numbers when he plays 25 plus. I'm quite sure we'll see Mo is as competent a scorer and a far better rebounder. Plus in the area of forced turnovers, Taylor is either 1 or 2 on the team in drawn charges. Does Frye even have 1 or 2?
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
ultknicks524
Posts: 20267
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/8/2005
Member: #889
2/6/2006  8:50 PM
Per 48 minutes stats is the most useless statistic ever created.



[Edited by - ultknicks524 on 02-06-2006 8:50 PM]
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  8:51 PM
Posted by McK1:

comparing the per 48 minutes stats of a aguy who plays 17 minutes vs a guy who plays 27 minuts is very biased and imbalanced. You just got on dj on the Paul thread about this.

How about you do the comparison based on when both guys get 25 minutes a night. nba.com has the game by game statlines. What are Mo Taylors numbers when he plays 25 plus. I'm quite sure we'll see Mo is as competent a scorer and a far better rebounder. Plus in the area of forced turnovers, Taylor is either 1 or 2 on the team in drawn charges. Does Frye even have 1 or 2?

Frye's edge is shotblocking and rebounding would more than make up for his lack of charge-drawing. As I said, I don't like MoT's charge-drawing defense. He does that rather than contest the shot and it gets the opposing team a lot of free throws on what would be misses.

And per 48 minutes equalizes all their stats over the same stretch of time. Want to see Frye's numbers as a starter vs MoT's? it's not pretty.
¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  8:53 PM
Posted by ultknicks524:

Per 48 minutes stats is the most useless statistic ever created.



[Edited by - ultknicks524 on 02-06-2006 8:50 PM]

It allows you to equalize what each guy is doing in his time on the court so you can compare guys playing different ammounts of minutes. it's pretty freaking straight forward. Hollinger uses it, but he made his own, which is per 40 minutes, but it's the same exact thing - looking at what player give you over a similar time period. There's no trickery involved.
¿ △ ?
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
2/6/2006  8:54 PM
Frye's edge is shot-blocking and free throw percentage.

the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
2/6/2006  8:55 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by ultknicks524:

Per 48 minutes stats is the most useless statistic ever created.



[Edited by - ultknicks524 on 02-06-2006 8:50 PM]

It allows you to equalize what each guy is doing in his time on the court so you can compare guys playing different ammounts of minutes. it's pretty freaking straight forward. Hollinger uses it, but he made his own, which is per 40 minutes, but it's the same exact thing - looking at what player give you over a similar time period. There's no trickery involved.

According to per 48 minute stats, Jerome James is a dominant shot-blocker. We are seeing that is far from true.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
2/6/2006  8:55 PM
You can't underestimate how much NBA experience makes someone a better NBA player. Anyway, LB said he wants to put the young guys in a position where they can succeed and throwing them to the wolves is not that. Give them significant minutes off the bench this year until they are ready.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
2/6/2006  8:56 PM
The most compelling reason is the future of the franchise.
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  8:58 PM
Fine, as starters:

Frye: 15.3ppg, 7.7rpg, 1.1bpg, 1.2apg, 48.6FG% ,84%FT (2.5att), 2.1TO

MoT:7.9ppg, 4.8rpg, .22bpg, .9apg, 44.8%Fg, 91%FT (1.3att), 1.8TO

I think per48 is more fair, but these numbers are ridiculous.
¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  8:58 PM
I don't understand how this is even debatable.
¿ △ ?
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
2/6/2006  8:59 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

I don't understand how this is even debatable.

It's called developing a player.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/6/2006  8:59 PM
you're not going to get an argument on this one. frye doesn't play a lick of defense and would probably pick up 2 quick fouls but i'd still rather start him instead of mo teezy.

i mean, we are rebuilding, right?
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
2/6/2006  9:03 PM
you're not going to get an argument on this one. frye doesn't play a lick of defense
Same with Mo T but at least frye will block and alter some shots
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  9:04 PM
Posted by Knight:
Posted by crzymdups:

I don't understand how this is even debatable.

It's called developing a player.

There isn't a single rookie anywhere in the league who is playing as well as Frye and coming off the bench. I know there is more pressure in NY, but one of the best things about Frye seems like his ability to handle the pressure.

¿ △ ?
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  9:05 PM
And the thing is: Frye is a rookie, he is going to get better. MoT is in his prime, on the downslide of it, actually. This is as good as it gets with MoT.
¿ △ ?
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
2/6/2006  9:06 PM
Posted by crzymdups:
Posted by Knight:
Posted by crzymdups:

I don't understand how this is even debatable.

It's called developing a player.

There isn't a single rookie anywhere in the league who is playing as well as Frye and coming off the bench. I know there is more pressure in NY, but one of the best things about Frye seems like his ability to handle the pressure.

Have you ever thought that maybe he is succeeding partly because he is able to come off the bench and not have the pressure of starting and playing against first units?
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/6/2006  9:06 PM
The main reason to start Frye is to see if he and Curry can coexist. I've said all along that I didn't think this team would win until they learned to play together and I still think that for the long-term we have to figure out if they can play together.
¿ △ ?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
2/6/2006  9:06 PM
exhibit A:

http://www.ultimateknicks.com/forum/topic.asp?t=14278
Long Overdue: The Case for Starting Frye over Mo Taylor

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy