[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

who's a better player: crawford or hinrich?
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
1/24/2006  11:35 AM
times are slow so just coming up with some new threads.

who do you think is a better player?


hinrich
g pts reb ast to fg% 3fg% ft%
03/04 76 12.0 3.5 6.8 2.7 39% 39% 80%
04/05 77 15.9 3.9 6.4 2.3 40% 36% 80%
05/06 39 14.5 3.5 6.6 2.4 41% 36% 83%

crawford
g pts reb ast to fg% 3fg% ft%
00/01 61 4.6 1.4 2.3 1.4 35% 35% 70%
01/02 23 9.3 1.5 2.4 1.4 38% 45% 77%
02/03 80 10.7 2.3 4.2 1.7 41% 36% 81%
03/04 80 17.3 3.6 5.1 2.4 39% 32% 83%
04/05 70 17.7 2.9 4.3 2.1 40% 36% 84%
05/06 37 14.9 3.3 3.7 2.4 42% 39% 83%


AUTOADVERT
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
1/24/2006  11:37 AM
How dare you attempt to influence our biases with numbers.
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/24/2006  11:41 AM
I think hinrich is better
ultknicks524
Posts: 20267
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/8/2005
Member: #889
1/24/2006  11:41 AM
Hinrich
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
1/24/2006  11:47 AM
They don't play the same position.
TemujinKnick
Posts: 20771
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/3/2005
Member: #1022

1/24/2006  11:50 AM
Depends on whether Crawford keeps getting better or not.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
1/24/2006  11:53 AM
Hinrich
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
islesfan
Posts: 9999
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 7/19/2004
Member: #712
1/24/2006  11:56 AM
Be careful, if you choose Hinrich you're going to be called a racist.
If it didn’t work in Phoenix with Nash and Stoutamire... it’s just not a winning formula. It’s an entertaining formula, but not a winning one. - Derek Harper talking about D'Antoni's System
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/24/2006  11:59 AM
Hinrich is prolly better now...his cerebral part of the game puts him over crawford, but Craw definately has alot more potential.
~You can't run from who you are.~
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/24/2006  12:00 PM
Hinrich is obviously more fundamentally sound, but Craw can take over a game when he's on.

i'd take Hinrich if i had to choose because i prefer his style of play on my team, but overall i think Craw is more talented.

[Edited by - TMS on 01-24-2006 12:01 PM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/24/2006  12:09 PM
Hinrich because of the D.. easy one for me (and I like Crawford)
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
1/24/2006  12:16 PM
Hinrich's actually younger than Crawford is, so to base it on potential is silly since Hinrich theoretically has more.

Day to day you obviously have to take Hinrich, he's far more consistent and better defensively, but as TMS pointed out Crawford can take over games.

Consistency and defense or the ability to game over, you're pick, I'd say its a push.
#Knickstaps
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
1/24/2006  12:26 PM
I like Hinrich, plays D and plays tough...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/24/2006  12:42 PM
Hinrich because of the defense, decision-making, and consistency. It's not even close.
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
1/24/2006  12:43 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

Hinrich's actually younger than Crawford is, so to base it on potential is silly since Hinrich theoretically has more.

Day to day you obviously have to take Hinrich, he's far more consistent and better defensively, but as TMS pointed out Crawford can take over games.

Consistency and defense or the ability to game over, you're pick, I'd say its a push.


Wait...did you just associate the fact that Hinrich is younger so he has more potential than Crawford?!? Even theoretically that doesn't work! I guess that means Jarrett Jack has more potential than both......or Dijon Thompson, or our very own Ariza! WOOHOO...

[Edited by - joec32033 on 01-24-2006 12:48 PM]
~You can't run from who you are.~
MS
Posts: 27063
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/28/2004
Member: #724
1/24/2006  12:45 PM
what a stupid question,not even close crawford is not a good player, he is one dimensional and kills this knicks defensively....

lets be realistic
realhiphop
Posts: 20332
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/14/2004
Member: #533
1/24/2006  12:46 PM
Age and potential don't necessarily have to go hand in hand. Hinrich doesn't have outstanding athleticism, or speed. His game won't change that much throughout the course of his career. Crawford has a lot more potential. He is extremely quick, with length and athleticism. He still needs to put it all together. With that said, I like Hinrich more than Craw at this point. He's a smart, talented, defensive player. Exactly the type of player LB would love to have running the point.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/24/2006  12:46 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

Hinrich's actually younger than Crawford is, so to base it on potential is silly since Hinrich theoretically has more.

Day to day you obviously have to take Hinrich, he's far more consistent and better defensively, but as TMS pointed out Crawford can take over games.

Consistency and defense or the ability to game over, you're pick, I'd say its a push.

Craw has more talent, Hinrich is the better player now. Craw can take games over, but he is too inconsistant for that to be much of a factor. He has played poorly with Steph out, and during stretches throughout.

I'll take defense and consistancy over horible D and occasionally breakout performances followed by 2 point outings. Especially for where our team is now. The spurs, and pistons can afford to have a player like Craw on their squad, we can't because we rely on him and when he sucks we lose.
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
1/24/2006  12:51 PM
I think they're similar in terms of plus and minuses- you'd take based on team need.
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
1/24/2006  2:34 PM
hinrich is a PG, JC is not. but looking strictly at their numbers, hinrich is better.
who's a better player: crawford or hinrich?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy