[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

What Would Marbury and Qyntel Look Like In The Backcourt?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/6/2006  9:36 AM
I love Nate but him matching up defensively against Dwyane Wade, Michael Redd, Ray Allen and Jason Richardson scares the bejeesus outtta me.

On the other hand, although Qyntel is raw and country as a chicken coop, he's 6'8 and presents a reasonable obstacle to shoot over. Qyntel has looked to pass immediately and shy on his jump shot, but he has shown the ability to get to the rack and finish with authority.

What's the worst that can happen?

Bring back the big backcourt

once a knick always a knick
AUTOADVERT
lovespree
Posts: 20310
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/1/2001
Member: #53
USA
1/6/2006  9:38 AM
I agree, I'd like to see what those two could accomplish together. We are to small with Nate starting in that position. While he has the speed to keep up with the Wade's of the world (plus crazy hops) I don't think he would alter or bother their shot's at all.
NY KNICKS 4 EVER! Will we ever find players like Anthony Mason, Xavier McDaniels, Patrick Ewing again? I hope so.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
1/6/2006  10:24 AM
Posted by misterearl:

I love Nate but him matching up defensively against Dwyane Wade, Michael Redd, Ray Allen and Jason Richardson scares the bejeesus outtta me.

Nate guards PG's. None of those guys are PG's
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
1/6/2006  10:30 AM
the problem is when we dont have two pg "type" players the offense sucks.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
1/6/2006  10:33 AM
I really like the three guard rotation of Nate, Marbury and Craw. I agree with Fish, Marbury has always needed a second ballhandler out there to open up the floor for him.

I think people are overrating Qyntel. He's okay.
¿ △ ?
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
1/6/2006  10:33 AM
another problem is that Nate and Marbs guard better than Woods no matter who they are guarding.
I just hope that people will like me
LBeast
Posts: 20319
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/29/2005
Member: #994
1/6/2006  10:46 AM
Nate's strength on D is his ball pressure. He'll guard PGs, while Marbury will guard the SGs like Wade, etc....
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/6/2006  12:27 PM
Q's quite possibly the worst 1 on 1 defender we have... just how would that improve our perimeter defense?
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
bigbeast
Posts: 22333
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 12/21/2005
Member: #1060
1/6/2006  1:03 PM
Plus, Q doesn't handle it well enough at this point in his career to play in the backcourt
"Man, who knows with this team." Aguirre.
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
1/6/2006  1:04 PM
but, nonetheless, it would be interesting to see what he could do at the 2spot.
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
1/6/2006  1:54 PM
now that Woods is in the rotation lets see what he can do as a backup SF first before we make him a starter. He still needs to work on his footwork on both ends. I'd start him on Kobe though since he killed Marbury last time
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
1/6/2006  2:26 PM
Posted by Bippity10:

another problem is that Nate and Marbs guard better than Woods no matter who they are guarding.

If we're talking about pure defense, our best backcourt lineup is Marbury and Nate with probably Ariza as the small foward. In terms of offense, I think the team works great with that 3 guard lineup, but mainly in smaller stretches. It worked great against Phoenix, but it's not always gonna be that way. When Crawford gets his defense going though, it's a no brainer to put him in the starting lineup and give him almost 40 minutes a game.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
jaydh
Posts: 23150
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/16/2001
Member: #96
1/6/2006  2:37 PM
Posted by Allanfan20:
Posted by Bippity10:

another problem is that Nate and Marbs guard better than Woods no matter who they are guarding.

If we're talking about pure defense, our best backcourt lineup is Marbury and Nate with probably Ariza as the small foward. In terms of offense, I think the team works great with that 3 guard lineup, but mainly in smaller stretches. It worked great against Phoenix, but it's not always gonna be that way. When Crawford gets his defense going though, it's a no brainer to put him in the starting lineup and give him almost 40 minutes a game.

yea, i see Nate becoming that combo guard off the bench, and Craw becoming a starter once LB is confident in his D. Q1 has been erased from our plans.
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
1/6/2006  2:50 PM
Posted by crzymdups:



I think people are overrating Qyntel. He's okay.

I agree with this, wood's ballhandling, jump shooting, and defense to me are lacking to put him in a SG role. I think this team needs offense at the 2 guard, I dont even know how good his J is, but his driving skill aren't fully developed yet, and since he seems to have a major problem keeping his man in front of him I dont think that its a good idea.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
1/6/2006  2:54 PM
Qyntel can be a solid player on both ends of the court if he wants to be and if he can keep his head on straight. If he's got the right attitude, he will have been a steal for just a league min contract. It's gonna take time, though. How long had it been before he signed with the Knicks since he even played in an NBA game? He's had inconsistent minutes his whole career (through his own faults).

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 01-06-2006 2:56 PM]
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
1/6/2006  5:36 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Qyntel can be a solid player on both ends of the court if he wants to be and if he can keep his head on straight. If he's got the right attitude, he will have been a steal for just a league min contract. It's gonna take time, though. How long had it been before he signed with the Knicks since he even played in an NBA game? He's had inconsistent minutes his whole career (through his own faults).

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 01-06-2006 2:56 PM]

Q2 supposedly has T-mac skills. Hope he realizes these and gets in the game, literally.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
1/6/2006  5:52 PM
those T-Mac comparisons were made to him coming out of junior college... you all should be happy if Q Woods realizes even Bobby Simmons level skills at this point.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Caseloads
Posts: 27725
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/29/2001
Member: #41
1/6/2006  5:58 PM
Posted by TMS:

those T-Mac comparisons were made to him coming out of junior college... you all should be happy if Q Woods realizes even Bobby Simmons level skills at this point.

True. We'll take whatever we can get.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
1/6/2006  6:41 PM
Manhattan turnstiles
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
misterearl
Posts: 38786
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/16/2004
Member: #799
USA
1/6/2006  10:05 PM
I think Larry Brown likes Qyntel
once a knick always a knick
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
What Would Marbury and Qyntel Look Like In The Backcourt?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy