[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

a couple of points --let's put the crp to bed
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/18/2005  8:13 PM
would i trade
mike Sweetney and Rudy gay for eddie curry? NO anyone else?
Mike Sweetney and Rajon Rondo for Eddie Curry?No anyone else?
Mike Sweetney and Lamarcus Aldridge for Eddie Curry NO
Mike Sweetney and Adam Morrison for Eddie Curry? No anyone else?


in fact i came up with several more names that I would NOT pair with Mike Sweetney AND give up my rights to the greg oden draft for Eddie Curry we give away 2nd round picks like the cherries on top we have 0 value for them--heck we paid how much to SA to get malik for pick 30+30? and we are likely to have what pick 33 this year--oh yeah thats in houston for mo taylor.
Let isiah Thomas come on this board and refute me. Im not an idiot, Id like to debate this with any so-called nBA professional, ESPECIALLY given NO NBA team wanted eddie in FA

which leads me to point 2 if any scker thinks that they [knick management] didnt think they were a sure-fire playoff team now, you are foolish. they dont have a 125 MILLIOn $ payroll because they are rebuilding---what business fundtion increases payroll at such huge rates to lose more money? NONE--in times of despair business CUT payroll---you see they didnt acquire Q-Rich for 40mm Jerome James for 30mm Mo taylor for 9mm per Malik rose for 6.6mm per in the last 6-7 months to ebuild--you dont rebuild with those types you are trying to win now. What has happened is utter failure--the players are ineffecient soft and dont mesh. if we were rebuilding no rookie would have a jacket on like david lee for multiple games to let 37 year old davis play--its a lie--but its a convenient lie we put pieces that dont fit together and its going to be hard to descramble them.

Isiah did a good job of drafting Trevor Ariza Channing Frye and David Lee. I like nate at 30 but not for a larry brown team.
the eddie curry trade could equla disaster so i give no grade but it has a high chance of big time back fire.

other than that isiah has clearly wasted 300+ mmillion dollars with Taylor marbury Craw Q-rich really every vet he acquired


like i said i think we are going in the right direction somewhat --i mean we have spent so much money we have had to get something for it, no? i mean we couldnt have 12 earl boykins for 300-400mm spent? but for the monetary advantage we have, they have[knicks management] should be rated as a d since isiah walked in.


they have to admit failue to themsleves first back up stop lying and try to JUSt get rid of some guys who just dont fit. Ill trad q -rich for a bag of peanuts--anyone buying?
RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
12/18/2005  8:29 PM
We still dont know how good eddy curry can be once he gets into shape, and even though theyre playing terrible now the knicks have shown flashes of being a very good grind it out team in LA and in PHO if they can do that consistetly then the knick may not wind up with a high draft pick, plus the knicks can still improve with a trade, but its nice to know some things some never change
LongIslandKnicksFan
Posts: 21187
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/18/2003
Member: #496
USA
12/18/2005  8:29 PM
Briggs, I agree with all of your points. Very smart analysis.
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
12/18/2005  8:31 PM
As I said on another thread, it could have been Sweetney and Lee and keep the pick.
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
12/18/2005  8:31 PM
Posted by Rich:

As I said on another thread, it could have been Sweetney and Lee and keep the pick.

All of the picks?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
12/18/2005  8:32 PM
considering the resources available in terms of dollars, isiah has done a very poor job. isiah is a draft evaluator...and that's pretty much it. all his veteran trades have not worked out. including the 3 headscratchers (in chronological order): 1. mo taylor, 2: kurt trade (when we clearly see there was no follow up), 3: jerome james.

there is blood in the water. first up in the firing line is marbury. a close second is isiah. get ready, there's gonna be some drama over the next few weeks.

like you said briggs, with all that money spent, at least there's some youth but spending SO much money just makes me shake my head.

yup, there's a contingent that doesn't give a crap about our cap. fine, good for you. meanwhile, talk to the unemployed ushers from the 400's and msg staff that will be let go b/c we HAD to have jerome james.

times are bad...so all the bad stuff come out. but if you sit back and honestly assess our situation, it's like a tale of two teams - the youth and the vets. the youths are good (no real superstars of the bunch), and the vets simply SUCK. a team with no chemistry, one dimensional players, and some that are just clueless. all in the while, killing our cap. so what EXACTLY has isiah accomplished in his 2 years here? did he get rid of the layden mediocrity? yes he did. but so far, the flash has not brought any substance.

we ALWAYS get screwed in trades. why does a team like pheonix call US to make the kurt trade? why does a team like the spurs give US two #1's? b/c isiah's a sucker and a man with no patience.

it's time for him to ADMIT his MISTAKES and start making some smart moves.

[Edited by - djsunyc on 12-18-2005 8:35 PM]
Rich
Posts: 27410
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 12/30/2003
Member: #511
USA
12/18/2005  8:35 PM
Posted by SlimPack:
Posted by Rich:

As I said on another thread, it could have been Sweetney and Lee and keep the pick.

All of the picks?

I'm not sure of all the machinations of the negotiations between Isiah and Paxson, but it was widely reported that Paxson wanted Lee along with Sweetney and TT, but Isiah refused and gave up an unprotected pick this year (and a potential switch of picks next year). I'm not certain whether or not next year's pick was in play if Lee had been included.
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
12/18/2005  8:40 PM
Okay Briggs I will bite. Will any of the three have a better career than Curry I dont think so. The other thing is the season isnt over and you get to the 7th or 8th pick and things change. Alderidge has had back problems, Gay has to work on his offensive game. When was the last time a white man with a porn mustache made an big impact in the NBA. Rondo couldnt score in a whore house with a fistful of money. Lets see how the season plays out, Curry has been injured but his has a chance to be an impact player.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
12/18/2005  8:47 PM
First of all, like Mike said in that interview with Zeke, in the future, Curry, on a BAD day, will probly put up 17 and 7. That's the potential he has.....on a BAD day.

All he has to do is stay relatively healthy and work hard.

The way he's sounded in interviews shows an actually intelligent player. I thought originally that he would sound dumb as bricks like Stephon, but he's said all the right things so far.

No "I'm the best Center in the league" comments from either him or Frye. I'm encouraged by both of their potential...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 12-18-2005 8:48 PM]
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
12/18/2005  8:54 PM
Again, Briggs you said we were serious title contenders when we got Curry and Brown. It's easy to second-guess but why would you have given up further assets to lottery-protect a pick when you thought we were serious title contenders? Would it make sense for the Mavs to throw Josh Howard into a deal just to get a pick they were giving up top five protected? Of course not. Why would it make sense to lottery protect a pick four our team that you said was a serious title contender?
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
12/18/2005  9:02 PM
Posted by bobs3304:

First of all, like Mike said in that interview with Zeke, in the future, Curry, on a BAD day, will probly put up 17 and 7. That's the potential he has.....on a BAD day.

All he has to do is stay relatively healthy and work hard.

The way he's sounded in interviews shows an actually intelligent player. I thought originally that he would sound dumb as bricks like Stephon, but he's said all the right things so far.

No "I'm the best Center in the league" comments from either him or Frye. I'm encouraged by both of their potential...

[Edited by - bobs3304 on 12-18-2005 8:48 PM]

where in his career has he even averaged 7 rebounds. On a bad day 11 & 3. On a good day 17 & 7. On a great day 25 & 12. It all better be in under 29 minutes. At 30 Curry is out like Al Bundy.
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/18/2005  9:03 PM
Posted by King1:

Okay Briggs I will bite. Will any of the three have a better career than Curry I dont think so. The other thing is the season isnt over and you get to the 7th or 8th pick and things change. Alderidge has had back problems, Gay has to work on his offensive game. When was the last time a white man with a porn mustache made an big impact in the NBA. Rondo couldnt score in a whore house with a fistful of money. Lets see how the season plays out, Curry has been injured but his has a chance to be an impact player.



I simply dont agree with any of that. I think 25 out of 30 nba teams would take rondo over curry straight up, not to mention add sweetney. rondo is a hard guard in the nba because he can go by hi man on demand get into the lane and hes very good at passing out of the lane to open men or using a very nice one-handed floater to score--an elite defender rebounder from the 1.Curry has as much or more injury related potential as aldridge
gay and morrison are 1-2 in the draft nba superstars in the making. i wouldnt question rudy gays talent level -the kid is 18 and has every desirable skill to be an elite nBA superstar.

there are other guys I like like tyrus thomas from lSU--the guy looks like a dennis rodman rebounder with shawn kemp type leaping ability and major league shot blocking talent--heck i dont even know if glenn davis wont be a better nba player than eddie curry but i wont bet against it. thats two players from one team right there i wouldnt trade with sweetney and they are likely not on draft lists that are posted

not to mention if we sck again in 07 the talent level in that class is out of this world.
RIP Crushalot😞
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
12/18/2005  9:04 PM
Posted by McK1:

where in his career has he even averaged 7 rebounds. On a bad day 11 & 3. On a good day 17 & 7. On a great day 25 & 12. It all better be in under 29 minutes. At 30 Curry is out like Al Bundy.

I said that Mike said that's his POTENTIAL.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/18/2005  9:05 PM
[quote]
Posted by bobs3304:

First of all, like Mike said in that interview with Zeke, in the future, Curry, on a BAD day, will probly put up 17 and 7. That's the potential he has.....on a BAD day.

All he has to do is stay relatively healthy and work hard.


Im sorry how may times has eddie curry averaged 7 rebounds in his 5 years? 17 points? answer none.
mike franseca doesnt know jack about basketball. Im not syaing eddie cant but he sure hasnt PROVEN it.
RIP Crushalot😞
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
12/18/2005  9:08 PM
please see previous post...
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
King1
Posts: 22993
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/2/2005
Member: #998
USA
12/18/2005  10:09 PM
I love Gay, and think he will be great lets just see where this goes. I am not sold on Curry but I am willing to give him a year to figure things out. I just dont think it will be a top 4 pick so those guys wont be there. I have seen Rondo play a lot and the kid can shoot to save his life.
martin
Posts: 79076
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
12/18/2005  10:11 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

would i trade
mike Sweetney and Rudy gay for eddie curry? NO anyone else?
Mike Sweetney and Rajon Rondo for Eddie Curry?No anyone else?
Mike Sweetney and Lamarcus Aldridge for Eddie Curry NO
Mike Sweetney and Adam Morrison for Eddie Curry? No anyone else?


in fact i came up with several more names that I would NOT pair with Mike Sweetney AND give up my rights to the greg oden draft for Eddie Curry we give away 2nd round picks like the cherries on top we have 0 value for them--heck we paid how much to SA to get malik for pick 30+30? and we are likely to have what pick 33 this year--oh yeah thats in houston for mo taylor.
Let isiah Thomas come on this board and refute me. Im not an idiot, Id like to debate this with any so-called nBA professional, ESPECIALLY given NO NBA team wanted eddie in FA

which leads me to point 2 if any scker thinks that they [knick management] didnt think they were a sure-fire playoff team now, you are foolish. they dont have a 125 MILLIOn $ payroll because they are rebuilding---what business fundtion increases payroll at such huge rates to lose more money? NONE--in times of despair business CUT payroll---you see they didnt acquire Q-Rich for 40mm Jerome James for 30mm Mo taylor for 9mm per Malik rose for 6.6mm per in the last 6-7 months to ebuild--you dont rebuild with those types you are trying to win now. What has happened is utter failure--the players are ineffecient soft and dont mesh. if we were rebuilding no rookie would have a jacket on like david lee for multiple games to let 37 year old davis play--its a lie--but its a convenient lie we put pieces that dont fit together and its going to be hard to descramble them.

Isiah did a good job of drafting Trevor Ariza Channing Frye and David Lee. I like nate at 30 but not for a larry brown team.
the eddie curry trade could equla disaster so i give no grade but it has a high chance of big time back fire.

other than that isiah has clearly wasted 300+ mmillion dollars with Taylor marbury Craw Q-rich really every vet he acquired


like i said i think we are going in the right direction somewhat --i mean we have spent so much money we have had to get something for it, no? i mean we couldnt have 12 earl boykins for 300-400mm spent? but for the monetary advantage we have, they have[knicks management] should be rated as a d since isiah walked in.


they have to admit failue to themsleves first back up stop lying and try to JUSt get rid of some guys who just dont fit. Ill trad q -rich for a bag of peanuts--anyone buying?


I can shoot down your assumptions so fast and it will make your argument crumble in a second man.

You state that NO other team was interested in Curry. Bull crap. You have zero way of knowing this. ZERO. Maybe you are relying on Chad or whatever but there were other offers and inquires.

Let me put this to you clearly: The Knicks have a $125 million dollar payroll and they are also rebuilding. Deal with it. Just because you as a team are bleeding through the nose does not make it mutually exclusive for you to be rebuilding. What part of younger bodies do you not understand? Frye, Lee, Nate, Crawford, Jackie, Curry are all young. Your definition of rebuilding means collecting draft picks and starting from scratch and maybe signing a free agent. Guess what? In NY you cannot do this. Why? It’s financially unreasonable. Same for the Yankees. The Yankees as a baseball organization lost money because of payroll, but baby, they don’t count the revenue made by TV, corporate sponsors and other whatnot. Same with the Knicks, they have the highest per seat average and with the other streams, they cannot afford to be Atlanta or Toronto for years.

Now, how many more picks do you want on this team? You almost have too many young guys and the current ones need playing time. So why are you complaining about some more second round picks that they included in the Curry deal? Oh, and anyone with a right mind would also say that Jackie would be a middle first rounder this year. We do have SA 30th pick and also have Isiah. First you praise Isiah for being a talent guy and then you shoot down the notion of the 30th pick. Don’t both add up together to be OK. You and I both can rattle off a full list of potential candidates at the 30 range that are impact.

The Knicks were only in a position to increase payroll to increase talent OR they would have had to sit until Houston came off the books plus about 3-4 years it would take Bynum to grow up. That’s a total of 6-7 years of HUGE losses. That’s financial mismanagement of ungodly proportions BRIGGS. And that’s what you call irresponsible.

I don’t know where you came up with the $300million dollar number. Look man, AD and Penny come off the books this year, Houston and Mo T next and JYD after that. And soon you loose your financial argument angle.

Curry is a risk, but that’s the position the Knicks were in. The guy is 23 and has really not been coached well. Isiah has surrounded him with the best teaching coach out there. Any reasonable person would say that Curry/Frye is a great freaking front line to build around. Maybe you would stake your team around Sweets and Gay. That’s nice.

You keep saying that what has happened is utter failure, but it’s only failure because it is not what you would have done. Here is a benchmark: What would have done in the 2 years since Isiah has taken over? Tell us your moves.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33
USA
12/18/2005  10:37 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Again, Briggs you said we were serious title contenders when we got Curry and Brown. It's easy to second-guess but why would you have given up further assets to lottery-protect a pick when you thought we were serious title contenders? Would it make sense for the Mavs to throw Josh Howard into a deal just to get a pick they were giving up top five protected? Of course not. Why would it make sense to lottery protect a pick four our team that you said was a serious title contender?


Bonn, I get what you are saying, but I don't think comparing Zeke's decisions regarding future draft picks with the Knicks is as closely related to the idea of the Mavericks as you suggest, even if fans and "experts" thought we would have been good this year. I've now come to believe that succeeding with major roster turnover may be an very high risk. Therefore, if you decide to include multiple near future 1st round draft picks when your team has not been good in the recent past, and has made significant roster changes you might be taking a HUGE risk hoping it will work out.

More so than when you do such a thing with a team of players and coaches that have been together for years, and succeeded, like the Mavs (and like the Knicks used to do when we had Ewing). So, even when it looks like an organizations made "home run" level moves on paper, if their is major turnover on a team (in the Knicks case, both players and management) over a short period of time those moves might be fools gold.

Take for instance teams like the Dodgers and Mets ("The Worst Team Money Can Buy"...remember that)in recent memory, who both spent exhorbant amounts of money on players like Bobby Bonilia, Vince Coleman, Kevin Brown and Shawn Green, and other players, but fizzled. Even now the Yankees, for all of their might, are beginning to resemble those kinds of teams, which I think is a result of loosing or the aging of guys that were the heart of the team.

The Lakers, for all of their success, had a freakin all-star team 2 years ago, but had all kinds of chemistry problems, made it to the Finals, none-the-less, but everyone expected that team to walk all over the NBA, and didn't. The Heat, this year, have shown signs of similar issues.

The Knicks, for all of their potential, have not been a good team for some time, and teams that trade picks when they are stinking up the joint, for the hope that it might work out, appear to take longer to get out of the rut. Isiah's drafting has been helpful, but if we are rebuilding, usually it helps to have draft picks, to add to the roster holes that need to be filled, or adding assets. I'm just a bit worried that this may have been too big of a risk. I hope I am proven wrong though.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
OngBok
Posts: 20899
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 5/1/2005
Member: #894
Thailand
12/18/2005  10:41 PM
Its the PAST man !!! Its OVER with !!! That was YESTERDAY'S news !!!
Isiah Thomas will lead us back to the playoffs in 2006 !!!
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
12/18/2005  10:46 PM
Tell us your moves.

from day 1 when i walked in two years ago-- tanked the rest of the season --lets figure devin harris is my pick[because we likely wouldve been worst 5] and set a goal of 2007 free agency with the ability to grab two maximum $ fA and built the next two years through the draft with 3-4 picks. I would also sat back and looked at being opportunstic within reason and tried to find a smart young MLE each year if a player was available with a goal of being a high IQ defensive orientated team other than that I respectfully disagree with your diatribe.
RIP Crushalot😞
a couple of points --let's put the crp to bed

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy