Posted by Bonn1997:
Again, Briggs you said we were serious title contenders when we got Curry and Brown. It's easy to second-guess but why would you have given up further assets to lottery-protect a pick when you thought we were serious title contenders? Would it make sense for the Mavs to throw Josh Howard into a deal just to get a pick they were giving up top five protected? Of course not. Why would it make sense to lottery protect a pick four our team that you said was a serious title contender?
Bonn, I get what you are saying, but I don't think comparing Zeke's decisions regarding future draft picks with the Knicks is as closely related to the idea of the Mavericks as you suggest, even if fans and "experts" thought we would have been good this year. I've now come to believe that succeeding with major roster turnover may be an very high risk. Therefore, if you decide to include multiple near future 1st round draft picks when your team has not been good in the recent past, and has made significant roster changes you might be taking a HUGE risk hoping it will work out.
More so than when you do such a thing with a team of players and coaches that have been together for years, and succeeded, like the Mavs (and like the Knicks used to do when we had Ewing). So, even when it looks like an organizations made "home run" level moves on paper, if their is major turnover on a team (in the Knicks case, both players and management) over a short period of time those moves might be fools gold.
Take for instance teams like the Dodgers and Mets ("The Worst Team Money Can Buy"...remember that)in recent memory, who both spent exhorbant amounts of money on players like Bobby Bonilia, Vince Coleman, Kevin Brown and Shawn Green, and other players, but fizzled. Even now the Yankees, for all of their might, are beginning to resemble those kinds of teams, which I think is a result of loosing or the aging of guys that were the heart of the team.
The Lakers, for all of their success, had a freakin all-star team 2 years ago, but had all kinds of chemistry problems, made it to the Finals, none-the-less, but everyone expected that team to walk all over the NBA, and didn't. The Heat, this year, have shown signs of similar issues.
The Knicks, for all of their potential, have not been a good team for some time, and teams that trade picks when they are stinking up the joint, for the hope that it might work out, appear to take longer to get out of the rut. Isiah's drafting has been helpful, but if we are rebuilding, usually it helps to have draft picks, to add to the roster holes that need to be filled, or adding assets. I'm just a bit worried that this may have been too big of a risk. I hope I am proven wrong though.
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...