[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

channing frye...charles smith reincarnate?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/22/2005  12:07 PM 

Regular Season Stats  
         PPG   FG%  FT%  RPG
1988-89  16.3 .495 .725  6.5      
1989-90  21.1 .520 .794  6.7      
1990-91  20.0 .469 .793  8.2


for the young bucks, smith was a legit player with the clippers before he got hurt and got to ny. he was a member of the 50 point club, had a nice little mid-range jumper and a nice little back to the basket game.

would this be a legit comparision? what do you guys think?

[Edited by - djsunyc on 11-22-2005 12:08 PM]
AUTOADVERT
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
11/22/2005  12:08 PM
Frye is much more competitive than Smith ever was. He is not soft like Smith and has a much higher bball IQ.
¿ △ ?
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/22/2005  12:10 PM
Posted by crzymdups:

Frye is much more competitive than Smith ever was. He is not soft like Smith and has a much higher bball IQ.

i don't know...you have to remember watching smith in the clippers. in ny, it was a TOTAL disaster as he was playing out of position at the 3 spot.
Panos
Posts: 30447
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
11/22/2005  1:35 PM
God! Bite your tongue! Compare him to Smith and then ask me if I'd trade him for KG...?
HARDCOREKNICKSFAN
Posts: 26191
Alba Posts: 28
Joined: 6/24/2002
Member: #263
USA
11/22/2005  1:43 PM
Statwise, Frye and Smith (rookie year) may look similar, but that's about it. The comparison alone is a bad omen.

Jump hard for those putbacks and tip-ins, Channing!
Another season, and more adversity to persevere through. We will get the job done, even BETTER than last year. GO KNICKS!
PhilinLA
Posts: 24941
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/12/2004
Member: #696
11/22/2005  1:52 PM
Channing looks like he'll add solid weight and get bigger over the next couple of years.
http://amonthhoffundays.blogspot.com/ We got a ringer.
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/22/2005  2:11 PM
they are similar. Hopefully chompers turns out to be a tougher cookie.

I like the fact he's not afraid to shoot it, even if he's missed a couple. He doesnt get down on himself when he makes mistakes either.

Lets face it... shooting is getting to be a lost art. He's got a great skill to build off of.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nalod
Posts: 71911
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/22/2005  2:15 PM
Smith was a great player before he got hurt.

After 8 games we are infinatlty qualified to project his career?

We are special fans.

Blame Riley or checketts for starphuching the trade that bought in damaged goods, Smith did the best he could and if he helped put us into a situation where a tip in would have put us in the finals, then he could not have been all that bad.

And we turned around and lost game 7 anyway.

Its amazing how we one again demonize and must put a face on failure. Its an organizational failure to put Charles smith in the situation to not succeed.

Yet, at the same time, Starks goes 3-18 and we don't call him soft? Starks mental breakdowns and un-timely technicals might be constued as being Mentally Soft. BUt he gets a lot of free passes because of his career. Charles Smith was not a life long Knick, so we judge him only by his career here. Again, it was wrong to bring him here!


Smith boxed, out, got the rebound. That was not soft. He was unable to dunk! That is his career legacy?

I guess we best not get into the finals out of fear Frye is not tough enoughl. Tough enough to get us in the finals does not count!

All this after 8 games!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/22/2005  2:19 PM
great post nalod. Smith was a easy target, but I saw him in his clipper days, even dropped 50 one game, the guy could play... before the injury he was a rising young star...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
11/22/2005  2:21 PM
Posted by Nalod:

Smith was a great player before he got hurt.

After 8 games we are infinatlty qualified to project his career?

We are special fans.

Blame Riley or checketts for starphuching the trade that bought in damaged goods, Smith did the best he could and if he helped put us into a situation where a tip in would have put us in the finals, then he could not have been all that bad.

And we turned around and lost game 7 anyway.

Its amazing how we one again demonize and must put a face on failure. Its an organizational failure to put Charles smith in the situation to not succeed.

Yet, at the same time, Starks goes 3-18 and we don't call him soft? Starks mental breakdowns and un-timely technicals might be constued as being Mentally Soft. BUt he gets a lot of free passes because of his career. Charles Smith was not a life long Knick, so we judge him only by his career here. Again, it was wrong to bring him here!


Smith boxed, out, got the rebound. That was not soft. He was unable to dunk! That is his career legacy?

I guess we best not get into the finals out of fear Frye is not tough enoughl. Tough enough to get us in the finals does not count!

All this after 8 games!


damn you nalod...damn you straight to hell.

smith did get a bum wrap but his knee was finished and was out of place with our toughness factor.

we got lucky b/c ewing fumbled the ball and it ended up in smith's hands. it was THE defining play of the 90's for the ny knicks. (and it was game 5, we then lost game 6 and got bounced - if we won it, we probably still lose game 6 and then have to play game 7 at home. i was at that game and we ALL knew that it was over after it.)
fishmike
Posts: 53902
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
11/22/2005  2:28 PM
sucks that fans remember you for such things.

Frye is cool. I like his humility and work ethic, but he comes off as mentaly tough on the court. Much like an Allan Houston mentality. Frye is incredibly versatile on offense. The D will come because he plays hard there. He just needs confidence. Still, he doesnt back down. He reminds me more of Jermain Oneil's first year in Indy. He was so smooth with the ball. JO was an is a better athlete, but not by much.

Frye needs to start at PF right now... no ifs ands or buts!!!!

http://www.82games.com/0506/0506NYK.HTM

off all the guys that play real minutes we play the best with him on the floor.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
Nalod
Posts: 71911
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/22/2005  2:33 PM
Posted by djsunyc:
Posted by Nalod:

Smith was a great player before he got hurt.

After 8 games we are infinatlty qualified to project his career?

We are special fans.

Blame Riley or checketts for starphuching the trade that bought in damaged goods, Smith did the best he could and if he helped put us into a situation where a tip in would have put us in the finals, then he could not have been all that bad.

And we turned around and lost game 7 anyway.

Its amazing how we one again demonize and must put a face on failure. Its an organizational failure to put Charles smith in the situation to not succeed.

Yet, at the same time, Starks goes 3-18 and we don't call him soft? Starks mental breakdowns and un-timely technicals might be constued as being Mentally Soft. BUt he gets a lot of free passes because of his career. Charles Smith was not a life long Knick, so we judge him only by his career here. Again, it was wrong to bring him here!


Smith boxed, out, got the rebound. That was not soft. He was unable to dunk! That is his career legacy?

I guess we best not get into the finals out of fear Frye is not tough enoughl. Tough enough to get us in the finals does not count!

All this after 8 games!


damn you nalod...damn you straight to hell.

smith did get a bum wrap but his knee was finished and was out of place with our toughness factor.

we got lucky b/c ewing fumbled the ball and it ended up in smith's hands. it was THE defining play of the 90's for the ny knicks. (and it was game 5, we then lost game 6 and got bounced - if we won it, we probably still lose game 6 and then have to play game 7 at home. i was at that game and we ALL knew that it was over after it.)

So if Ewing had bigger hands he would not have fumbled it and fur shure would have put the ball back in? Im sure his finger roll was considered "automatic"! So its not smith, not Ewing, but his genetic disposition for having small hands!

I knew eventually we'd get to the core!
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/22/2005  2:41 PM
frye said one thing that impressed me. He said he is proud of the family name and won't go out there and embarras his family name by not playing hard. That says a lot...
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
11/22/2005  3:16 PM
I didn't see Smith during his Clipper days, but for the Knicks he had a fairly slow release on his jumper, not unlike KT. Frye's jumper has a quick release for a big man and he has nice range on it. Plus he has a knack for making shots around the bucket from awkward or difficult positions where you'd think he'd have no chance at making it. Overall I can't say I recall Smith exhibiting anything like Frye's scoring talents, but again, I only saw him with NY.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
Nalod
Posts: 71911
Alba Posts: 155
Joined: 12/24/2003
Member: #508
USA
11/22/2005  3:19 PM
gunsnewing
Posts: 55076
Alba Posts: 5
Joined: 2/24/2002
Member: #215
USA
11/22/2005  3:30 PM
Posted by tkf:

frye said one thing that impressed me. He said he is proud of the family name and won't go out there and embarras his family name by not playing hard. That says a lot...


wow good stuff!
oohah
Posts: 26600
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/7/2005
Member: #887
11/22/2005  3:34 PM
Regular Season Stats
PPG FG% FT% RPG
1988-89 16.3 .495 .725 6.5
1989-90 21.1 .520 .794 6.7
1990-91 20.0 .469 .793 8.2

for the young bucks, smith was a legit player with the clippers before he got hurt and got to ny. he was a member of the 50 point club, had a nice little mid-range jumper and a nice little back to the basket game.

would this be a legit comparision? what do you guys think?

I am glad you said it. I see similarities in Fryes game to Charles Smith. Also Keith Van Horn and Juwan Howard. But this is not a bad thing! All three are/were good players. Smith was just wrong for the Knicks.

oohah

Good luck Mike D'Antoni, 'cause you ain't never seen nothing like this before!
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/22/2005  3:38 PM
I wouldn't trade Charles Smith for Kevin Garnett!
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/22/2005  3:44 PM
Nope.

Frye isn't Charles Smith recincarnate.

B/c according to alot of jockery fans, he's the next Michael Jordan.


(rolling eyes, if there was a smiley for it)
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
11/22/2005  4:22 PM
Another big difference between frye and smith is that frye was known as a defender in college a shot blocker, smith was not, these guys are really different..
Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
channing frye...charles smith reincarnate?
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy