http://www.82games.com/0506/0506NYK.HTM

We all know the team has played best when Ariza and the 3 rooks are in but this is really crazy. These are updated through the first 3.

Also RV had said something about Antonio's rebounding being good. Look at how the KNicks are with him on the floor. Hmmm.... stats stats stats

I thought Mo T had played well when he was in (especially the game where he drew 2 charges) but I didnt realize it was THAT good. I would keep him in the rotation and pair him with Frye at times for an inside outside punch.

I'm sticking to my prefered 3 guard line up
Marbury/Crawford/Q/Frye/Curry with the bench being: Nate/Ariza/Mo T/Lee
Barnes/JJ/AD/Rose/Penny can sit until further notice. I dont where Butler is at.

I guess this means Rose starts. Sucka!

Lies, damn lies and statistics...trust me, it's my field.

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-08-2005 12:51 PM]

These #s are quite unstable this early in the season. I'm sure they'll get much smaller but the point that the young guys are winners and the vets are losing games is clear.

Posted by Bonn1997:

These #s are quite unstable this early in the season. I'm sure they'll get much smaller but the point that the young guys are winners and the vets are losing games is clear.

hey you got it! Good boy

So what's your point? AD getting 9 boards a game is meaningless?

I don't see the correlation.

Posted by fishmike:

Posted by Bonn1997:

These #s are quite unstable this early in the season. I'm sure they'll get much smaller but the point that the young guys are winners and the vets are losing games is clear.

hey you got it! Good boy

also, for everyone who says we need a shooting forward, (myself included), so far, it's our most productive position. by A LOT.

http://www.82games.com/0506/0506NYK5.HTM

42% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

Posted by rvhoss:

According to you, he's where Penny is.

I have to rebut you oohah style, after one sentence makes no sense, I then see the next one that makes no sense and then the next one.

Construction workers shouldn't try to use statistics, they kill the music in the numbers.

Posted by fishmike:

I dont where Butler is at.

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-08-2005 12:58 PM]

I dont know where he's at BB wise. I cant say he deserves to play or doesnt. Thats what I meant.

Ariza is a budding new star and/or your stats are skewed (Rose best front court player)...

isn't it obvious frankenstein?

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-08-2005 1:21 PM]

The stats prove that Frye and Ariza and Lee have played the best this far. Marbs and Jamal have been bad, but look who they play with (AD and Barnes...yuck).

You know what's funny? Larry Brown used +/- stats as his reason for keeping Darko on the bench last season. He actually mentioned 82games.com. I hope he checks 82games.com before the Portland game. I wish we'd waived AD for Chicago and never signed Barnes.

I still don't understand, does AD suck and Rose is our best front court player?
Did you pull these stats to prove that they make no sense?

What are you thoughts on Rose's high ranking? And does this confirm Ariza is a star?

And why am I acting like a 3 year old? Who is my girlfriend?

Just answer the questions fishy!!!!

Posted by fishmike:

so they arent skewed for Ariza but they are for Rose?

Why dont you stop acting like a 3 year old and actually work on keepin a thread on basketball. What *MY* stats prove are very little, and I never siad they PROVED anything. What they show is the young guys are + and when AD is on the floor the Knicks are terrible.

Its 3 games. Take it for what its worth. Its the same 3 games that has you and your girlfriend convinced Ariza is the next superstar in the league because... well he's 20 and all 20 year olds that show promise become stars. Duh.. I got it now.

[Edited by - rvhoss on 11-08-2005 2:28 PM]