[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

what do you guys think about this
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/5/2005  3:23 PM
Antonio davis
David Lee
Nate Robinson
for
Keith Van Horn
Devin Harris

RIP Crushalot😞
AUTOADVERT
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
11/5/2005  3:29 PM
I'd do it.

In a heartbeat. Devin Harris would be great here. KVH in limited minuted too, plus he can shoot and he rebounds well.
SlimPack
Posts: 23588
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/14/2005
Member: #1009
USA
11/5/2005  3:40 PM
Interesting proposal but I actually dont think dallas would do it, devin harris has THAT much potential, also this isnt really that good of a deal for us either since there got to be a cheaper way to get a backup point.
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/5/2005  3:41 PM
From the Knicks perspective this trade is nice from the Dallas perspective its not. I can see them wanting to get rid of Van Horn becuase he just doesnt seem to fit in there but I don't think their itching to give up Harris even with Terry there.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/5/2005  3:43 PM
I haven't seen Harris that much but he hasn't done anything impressive yet. Nate's probably already a better rebounder! Is Keith a big component of the deal to you Briggs or are you including him just to make the salaries match?

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 11-05-2005 3:44 PM]
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/5/2005  3:49 PM
Posted by SlimPack:

Interesting proposal but I actually dont think dallas would do it, devin harris has THAT much potential, also this isnt really that good of a deal for us either since there got to be a cheaper way to get a backup point.

No I would play him at starting 2 guard

RIP Crushalot😞
teslawlo
Posts: 21482
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #699
USA
11/5/2005  3:53 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by SlimPack:

Interesting proposal but I actually dont think dallas would do it, devin harris has THAT much potential, also this isnt really that good of a deal for us either since there got to be a cheaper way to get a backup point.
No I would play him at starting 2 guard
Are you kidding? You would play DEVIN HARRIS as your starting shooting guard on this team. Come on, harris is a 6'3'' PG with nice athleticism. You want to start a 6'2'' PG and another 6'3'' as your starting 2. How do you think we would look defensively...


http://allknicks.com
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
11/5/2005  3:55 PM
Posted by teslawlo:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[quote]Posted by SlimPack:

Interesting proposal but I actually dont think dallas would do it, devin harris has THAT much potential, also this isnt really that good of a deal for us either since there got to be a cheaper way to get a backup point.
No I would play him at starting 2 guard
Are you kidding? You would play DEVIN HARRIS as your starting shooting guard on this team. Come on, harris is a 6'3'' PG with nice athleticism. You want to start a 6'2'' PG and another 6'3'' as your starting 2. How do you think we would look defensively...



how tall ws joe dumars isiah thomas and vinnie johnson?

answer 6-3 6-1 6-2


RIP Crushalot😞
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
11/5/2005  3:55 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by SlimPack:

Interesting proposal but I actually dont think dallas would do it, devin harris has THAT much potential, also this isnt really that good of a deal for us either since there got to be a cheaper way to get a backup point.

No I would play him at starting 2 guard


At 6'3? It's bad enough that Crawford gets lit up on D by SG's that are only a inch taller then him now we're going to throw Devin Harris at 6'3 as the starting 2, thats like asking for the electric chair... AGAIN. If we haven't learned from the Crawford deal that the starting 2 for these Knicks shouldn't be a 6'5/6'6 pure SG then I don't think we ever will. NO MORE PG CONVERTED TO SG EXPERIMENTS PLEASE!
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
teslawlo
Posts: 21482
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/13/2004
Member: #699
USA
11/5/2005  4:00 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:
Posted by teslawlo:
Posted by BRIGGS:

[quote]Posted by SlimPack:

Interesting proposal but I actually dont think dallas would do it, devin harris has THAT much potential, also this isnt really that good of a deal for us either since there got to be a cheaper way to get a backup point.
No I would play him at starting 2 guard
Are you kidding? You would play DEVIN HARRIS as your starting shooting guard on this team. Come on, harris is a 6'3'' PG with nice athleticism. You want to start a 6'2'' PG and another 6'3'' as your starting 2. How do you think we would look defensively...



how tall ws joe dumars isiah thomas and vinnie johnson?

answer 6-3 6-1 6-2
What year is the current season in? answer 2005-2006 season
What is the average height of an nba player this year? answer 6'7''
If anyone wants to throw in the height/weight of the average SG this year, please feel free to do so.
Who are you trying to make devin harris become? Iverson 2? You need to be extraordinary talented to be playing SG as a 6'3'' guy who primarily plays PG. Harris isn't exactly strong physically either.
http://allknicks.com
attaboy2005
Posts: 20524
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/24/2005
Member: #992
11/5/2005  4:13 PM
I think the trades are all over at this time, The team really needs to settle down and start playing basketball, instead of worrying whether they will be playing traded, this team as been a revolving door of players coming and going no wonder their is no chemistry at this time. They must focus on getting the team to play as a well oiled machine and not a patched up bunch of misfits, young or old.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
11/5/2005  6:51 PM
I like it a lot. It solves our SF problem for now (and if Keith doesn't work out, he's an FA after this year anyway). Devin is certainly NBA starter material. The only downside is that it's one of those trades that absolutely requires a follow-up trade. I don't see Devin Harris as a 2-guard and Marbury is a defensive liability as a 2-guard, so one of them has to go. I think the trade makes Marbury expendable and we might have to use him to get a big man. Other than the fact that it makes us pretty much have to trade Marbury, I like the deal a lot.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/5/2005  7:25 PM
Maybe Harris has some upside but I certainly don't see acquiring a career 6/2/1 player as making an all-star, olympian PG expendable. That's a big leap IMO. Harris didn't even make Jason Terry expendable. I have nothing against getting Keith. He's a nice role player, but I'd want him playing behind Ariza, Frye, and Lee at SF/PF.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 11-05-2005 7:26 PM]
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
11/5/2005  7:26 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Maybe Harris has some upside but I certainly don't see acquiring a career 6/2/1 player as making an all-star, olympian PG expendable. That's a big leap IMO. Harris didn't even make Jason Terry expendable.

Well, you don't trade for Harris to be a backup. If we want a backup, we already have Nate. Harris was the #5 pick in the draft and he will be a good one. He's very young. Patience, remember?
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
11/5/2005  7:33 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Maybe Harris has some upside but I certainly don't see acquiring a career 6/2/1 player as making an all-star, olympian PG expendable. That's a big leap IMO. Harris didn't even make Jason Terry expendable.

Well, you don't trade for Harris to be a backup. If we want a backup, we already have Nate. Harris was the #5 pick in the draft and he will be a good one. He's very young. Patience, remember?
I don't disagree with any of that. Harris is a gamble like flipping a coin that a team with no talent at the PG position should be considering right now. I'd rather use our assets to gamble on a player at SG, SF, or maybe PF.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/5/2005  7:40 PM
I've seen Harris.

He may not even be worth Nate alone.

NO.
DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
11/5/2005  7:42 PM
Posted by bobs3304:

I've seen Harris.

He may not even be worth Nate alone.

NO.

Laughable comment, IMHO.

Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
bobs3304
Posts: 24827
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 7/5/2005
Member: #948
11/5/2005  7:46 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by bobs3304:

I've seen Harris.

He may not even be worth Nate alone.

NO.

Laughable comment, IMHO.


Is it laughable b/c you know I prefer Marbury not to be on this team.

Or is it laughable b/c you think Harris has more potential than Nate.

B/c, "IMHO", Devin Harris is over-rated. I've seen enuff of this kid to know he's not worth giving up Lee and Nate.

DLee is the best thing to happen to NY in Isiah's 4 year tenure. And that alone, though a positive on the radar, is sad as hell.
attaboy2005
Posts: 20524
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/24/2005
Member: #992
11/5/2005  8:18 PM
Posted by bobs3304:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by bobs3304:

I've seen Harris.

He may not even be worth Nate alone.

NO.

Laughable comment, IMHO.


Is it laughable b/c you know I prefer Marbury not to be on this team.

Or is it laughable b/c you think Harris has more potential than Nate.

B/c, "IMHO", Devin Harris is over-rated. I've seen enuff of this kid to know he's not worth giving up Lee and Nate.

Now look who is smoking the reefer!

http://www.hoopshype.com/players/devin_harris.htm

If you saw him during preseason, Our Guards couldn't keep up with him, he is not over-rated, He is under-rated at this time !.
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
11/5/2005  8:21 PM
Posted by attaboy2005:
Posted by bobs3304:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by bobs3304:

I've seen Harris.

He may not even be worth Nate alone.

NO.

Laughable comment, IMHO.


Is it laughable b/c you know I prefer Marbury not to be on this team.

Or is it laughable b/c you think Harris has more potential than Nate.

B/c, "IMHO", Devin Harris is over-rated. I've seen enuff of this kid to know he's not worth giving up Lee and Nate.

Now look who is smoking the reefer!

http://www.hoopshype.com/players/devin_harris.htm

If you saw him during preseason, Our Guards couldn't keep up with him, he is not over-rated, He is under-rated at this time !.

Good post. Bobs is talking out of his ass again.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
what do you guys think about this
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy