Posted by nixluva:
To me its not the point of whether he is technically the BEST PG, but whether he has the right to think he is. Certainly every year he's up there. Nash just now finally got to his level, cuz for many years before this he hasn't been as good as Steph. Its mainly been between Kidd and Steph. Kidd to me has the right to be considered that so far, but Nash had a great season last year but its only one year, not many years like Kidd and Steph.
The whole thing is tough cuz like a QB its all about wins and loses, but the PG is only one part of the equation and too often Steph's teams haven't been all that good. Just compare who he's played with to Nash in Dallas and PHX. Even Kidd has had better teams for more of his career than Steph. None of Steph teams have ever been considered Conf. Finals material at the start of the season or at anytime during a season. Who you play with does matter. Tho people don't want to bring that into it.
Nobody considered the Suns conference finals material either this year, and I don't think that people were too high on the Nets when they first got Kidd. We'll see how Nash does this year without Q and without JJ - steph had Amare and Marion, and all though a lot of people talk about Amare's breakout year being this year, I wonder if Nash was in phoenix two years ago if Amare would have had that kind of year then - I know Steph has the potential to be up there and he is defeinitely a top 5 point guard, but it isn't like he has had TERRIBLE teams - I think Jason Kidd or even steve nash would have won more with the teams that Marbury had, but that's all just speculation/