[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Knicks' starting lineup 1 to 3
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
Bonn1997
Posts: 38654
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
I'm assuming we won't be getting many more players from PG to SF. So what starting lineup would you use and why?
Marbury, Crawford, Q (Bench = TT, Ariza, Nate)
Marbury, Q, TT (Bench = Craw, Nate, Ariza)
Marbury, Q, Ariza (Bench = Craw, Nate, TT)
Nate, Marbury, TT (Bench = Q, Craw, Ariza)
Nate, Marbury, Q (Bench = Craw, Ariza, TT)
Other
View Results


Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2005  2:09 PM
Now that I've thought about it more, I'm picking Marbury, Q, Ariza with TT's expiring contract traded in the offseason. That's an athletic lineup that's strong on defense. I like Crawford and Nate as sparks off the bench. I'd like to see some experimenting, though. (Sometimes have Q slide over to the 3 with Craw at the 2 and Marbury at 1; sometimes have Nate at 1, Marbury at 2.)
AUTOADVERT
MaTT4281
Posts: 34919
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #538
USA
7/1/2005  2:09 PM
I'm still hoping to see TT out the door this summer, so rack me up for Ariza at SF.
As for the back court, Isiah kept saying how he brought Crawford in to join that 3 guard rotation and never expected him to start or get so many minutes. Q has been brought in to replace Allen, not as a SF. The Marbs/Q/Ariza combo seem the most likely, or atleast the most hopeful for me.
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2005  2:10 PM
Posted by MaTT4281:

I'm still hoping to see TT out the door this summer, so rack me up for Ariza at SF.
As for the back court, Isiah kept saying how he brought Crawford in to join that 3 guard rotation and never expected him to start or get so many minutes. Q has been brought in to replace Allen, not as a SF. The Marbs/Q/Ariza combo seem the most likely, or atleast the most hopeful for me.
I like that too, but if Ariza's a starter, he's gonna put up solid #s, esp for a 20 year old and he'll grab a lot of attention. He'll be all over the highlight films with his dunks. So, they better get him locked up this summer into a long-term deal.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07/01/2005 14:11:58]
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/1/2005  2:12 PM
I want to see either Marbury, Q and Ariza, or trade Marbury in a package for a big and have Craw start at PG, with Q and Ariza at the 2 and 3. This will give Nate more playing time and it will give the Knicks the opportunity to COMPLETELY build for the future, as I don't see the Knicks being championship contenders while Marbury is still in his prime.

Keep Houston, and hopefully he'll be healthy enough to play 15 MPG. Screw Tim Thomas and Penny. They shouldn't even be in our plans for THIS YEAR.

But with we have right now, I like Marbury, Q, Ariza, either Sweetney or Lee and Frye.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Allanfan20
Posts: 35947
Alba Posts: 50
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #542
USA
7/1/2005  2:15 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:
Posted by MaTT4281:

I'm still hoping to see TT out the door this summer, so rack me up for Ariza at SF.
As for the back court, Isiah kept saying how he brought Crawford in to join that 3 guard rotation and never expected him to start or get so many minutes. Q has been brought in to replace Allen, not as a SF. The Marbs/Q/Ariza combo seem the most likely, or atleast the most hopeful for me.
I like that too, but if Ariza's a starter, he's gonna put up solid #s, esp for a 20 year old and he'll grab a lot of attention. He'll be all over the highlight films with his dunks. So, they better get him locked up this summer into a long-term deal.

[Edited by - Bonn1997 on 07/01/2005 14:11:58]

That would be ideal. If Ariza goes next Summer, b/c we didn't have his Bird Rights, we only have ourselves to blame.
“Whenever I’m about to do something, I think ‘Would an idiot do that?’ and if they would, I do NOT do that thing.”- Dwight Schrute
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/1/2005  2:16 PM
The only thing is that I'm trying to figure out how Nate and Crawford would each get enough playing time with Ariza, Q, and Marbury as the starters. Q would have to slide over to the 3 for about 15 mpg (maybe 40% of his total playing time). That might allow you to play Jamal 24 mpg and Nate about 14 mpg.
tomverve
Posts: 21407
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 3/4/2005
Member: #878
7/1/2005  3:04 PM
Put me down for Marbury, Q, and TT starting. Q at the two presents considerable matchup problems to the opposition on most nights, and allows JC to finally fill in that supersub microwave role for which his game seems optimum.

I start TT over Ariza for two reasons. One, it's TT's contract year and you know he's going to bring it; starting him and giving him every chance to shine could significantly boost his trade value. Penny is really the guy who we should try to trade in the offseason, since he's never going to raise his value on the court. Two, it's also Ariza's contract year, and while you want his game to grow, you don't want him catching so much attention that he gets an outrageous contract offer in the offseason. Luckily, the new Gilbert Arenas rule removes most worries that we'll lose him, as we'll be able to match any offer as long as we don't use our MLE on another player next offseason. Still, it'd be nice to lock him up to a long term contract whose figures are as low as possible.
help treat disease with your spare computing power : http://www.worldcommunitygrid.org/
djsunyc
Posts: 44929
Alba Posts: 42
Joined: 1/16/2004
Member: #536
7/1/2005  3:14 PM
steph, q, tt start

but LOOK at this 2nd unit:

nate
craw
ariza
lee
frye

is there a younger, more agile and quicker unit in the nba?
Knixkik
Posts: 35480
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
7/1/2005  3:50 PM
I think Marbury will be the 1, Crawford the 2, and Q Rich the 3, with TT being traded.
rvhoss
Posts: 24943
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/2/2004
Member: #777
Switzerland
7/1/2005  4:04 PM
Marbs, Q, TT...I just feel with TT and Q's post up ability AND long range shooting, marbs can truly begin to blossom as a drive and score/dish PG created in and for New York.

With Ariza and Craw coming off the bench, and both with a year under their belt, we sub an offense/defense combination giving us the ability to take out any of the 3 and not miss a beat.

all kool aid all the time.
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
7/1/2005  4:25 PM
I think TT is gone, thankfully.

I also think that Craw should be a starter, now that Nate is here, cause if Craw is the 3rd guard of the bench, where do you expect Nat to play?

So I'm going with Marbs, Craw, and Q, with Ariza, Nate and bigger swing player who can play limited time at both SG and SF with some shooting ability and defense. Allan Anderson who went undrafted seems like a good option. Or a veteran swing, nobody comes to mind right now, but if Penny stops being a jerk, he would fit the role.

A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
simrud
Posts: 23392
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/13/2003
Member: #474
USA
7/1/2005  4:25 PM
Basden who went undrafted would also work.
A glimmer of hope maybe?!?
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
7/1/2005  5:33 PM
Zeke said something while being interviewed by the ESPN radio, he said that it is up to the coach what the starting lineup will be. Personnaly I want two good defenders on the court at all times. Marb, Q, TT, Sweetney,Frye
Nate, Crawf, Ariza, Lee, and Kwame or Jerome James...



[Edited by - diderotn on 07/01/2005 17:36:18]
The true Knickabocker..........
roblackman
Posts: 20396
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #926
7/1/2005  5:35 PM
Until Ariz develops a jump shot he belongs coming off the bench. TT had a tough year personally last year but found his range the last few months of the season--he's still more talented than Ariza at this point.
And the reply is...a post that makes sense (still waiting)
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
7/1/2005  5:37 PM
TT will start....But I don't know how long a new coach will be able to put up with his frequent disappearances
The true Knickabocker..........
roblackman
Posts: 20396
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/27/2005
Member: #926
7/1/2005  5:40 PM
Posted by diderotn:

TT will start....But I don't know how long a new coach will be able to put up with his frequent disappearances

This will be TT's last chance to prove himself as a legitimate starter in the league in all likelihood--he has such a bad reputation--I hope he takes advantage of it.

[Edited by - roblackman on 07/01/2005 17:41:26]
And the reply is...a post that makes sense (still waiting)
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
7/1/2005  5:48 PM
Your are right about that...TT will probably come out and has a good season, because he wants a contract...
The true Knickabocker..........
Marv
Posts: 35540
Alba Posts: 69
Joined: 9/2/2002
Member: #315
7/1/2005  6:09 PM
you don't have my combo on there.

I go with Marbs, Craw and Reezy.

I want to give Craw a chance to shine. He was here last year, he had his ups and downs abut he's a quality kid who puts his heart into the game and deserves to be the incumbent in my opinion.

Q will be fine off the bench at 2 and 3.

Reezy is a bust out waiting to happen. Even though the smarter and wiser thing would be to start TT, I just have a revulsion about this guy. The less I have to see him the better.
kam77
Posts: 27664
Alba Posts: 25
Joined: 3/17/2004
Member: #634
7/1/2005  6:24 PM
Marbury, Q, TT (Bench = Craw, Nate, Ariza)

Marbury starts no question, until the day he is traded.

TT needs to play because he's in his contract year and we need to max his value up until the trading deadline.

Crawford becomes an electric 6th man instant offense player, Nate becomes an electric backup pG and Ariza is just plain electric. The plan is for Ariza to step his game up to where he could justifiably start once TT has been dealt.

I'm also counting on David Lee, JYD, and Malik to slide to SF for a few minutes here and there (assuming they are all still on the team).

[Edited by - kam77 on 07/01/2005 18:29:12]
lol @ being BANNED by Martin since 11/07/10 (for asking if Mr. Earl had a point). Really, Martin? C'mon. This is the internet. I've seen much worse on this site. By Earl himself. Drop the hypocrisy.
Knicksfan
Posts: 33483
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 7/5/2004
Member: #691
USA
7/1/2005  7:09 PM
Well, lets see:

TT will stay, at least until the trading deadline or maybe we renew his contract at a lower (extremely lower) amount, since he isn't a bad play to have for like 2-3 millions. The point is, he will probably be here at the start of the season. He is 6'11" and when interested he can play great games, post up and cause many mismatches.

Marbury is Marbury, the face of the Knicks, the franchise player. He will start.

So, between Q and Craw, who would I start? I'd say Q because he brings more options to the table (like posting up!) and because Craw can play both guard positions.
Knicks_Fan
Page 1 of 2  1  2 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Knicks' starting lineup 1 to 3
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy