[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]



Author Poll
Killa4luv
Posts: 7769
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
Kurt Thomas for David Wesley, Charlie Ward + 24?
2 votes
15.38%
Ny would do it but Hou wouldn't
1 votes
7.69%
Ny wouldn't do it Kurt is worth more.
2 votes
15.38%
Houston would do it minus the pick.
4 votes
30.77%
Without the pick NY shouldn't do it.
0 votes
0%
Ny should add their #30
0 votes
0%
NY should add their late second rounder.
4 votes
30.77%
Its just plain stupid.


Author Thread
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/5/2005  2:09 AM
I forgot to ask if you agreed, I've never done a poll before.

David Wesley and Charlie Ward both expire next year, ridding us of KT's contract. We also clear the PF glut, and end up with 2 solid, if aging players off the bench, esp. Wesley, he's a shooter and we don't have any.

Houston really needs a platyer like Kurt to keep teams honest on Yao. Houston needs another contribution and they get it on the glass, and on the score board with KT. His defense instantly becomes better playing next to Yao, 7-6 can cover alot of weaknesses.

Seems like ti makes sense.
AUTOADVERT
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/6/2005  12:24 PM
KT for Wesley straight up maybe, but getting that 1st rounder to be added on top would be a deal breaker imo.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/6/2005  3:38 PM
Posted by TMS:

KT for Wesley straight up maybe, but getting that 1st rounder to be added on top would be a deal breaker imo.
The salaries don't match without Charlie.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/6/2005  8:00 PM
that wouldn't be a problem...Charlie's little more than cap fodder at this point.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
6/6/2005  11:22 PM
Interestingly enough, i think Charlie is perfect for the 2-3 minutes per quarter he'll be playing. He can fill that role nicely for about half a season.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
6/7/2005  9:33 AM
i'd be fine w/bringing Charlie back in that type of limited role, but would much prefer going after a Lindsey Hunter to shore up our perimeter defense & give us a player who can still push the ball upcourt.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy