[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Should the Knicks Start Quickley at PG in the first game
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
TheGame
Posts: 6632
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
Prior to last night’s game, I was definitely of the view that the Knicks should start Elfrid Peyton next week and let Quickley come off the bench for a few months until the trade deadline. But after watching last night’s game and the impact Quickley’s ability to shoot has on the functioning of our offense, it seems clear to me that the kid should just start now. The vets might not like it but the kid is the best PG we have right now. He is a very mature kid, so I think he can handle the starting role.
24 votes
63.16%
Start Quickley-Let the Quickley era begin
11 votes
28.95%
Start Peyton- Quickley needs a month or two to continue to develop
1 votes
2.63%
Start DSJr so we can build up his value
2 votes
5.26%
Start Frank Nitty - so we can start with our best defensive player


Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
EwingsGlass
Posts: 27487
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 4/29/2005
Member: #893
USA
12/19/2020  2:27 PM
Not sure what the practices looked like, but he won that job in the pre-season games, IMO.
You know I gonna spin wit it
AUTOADVERT
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/19/2020  3:28 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2020  3:28 PM
I voted for a IQ to start. Kenny Albert asked Clyde who he would start and Clyde said Elfrid, because it was too much pressure to put on the young player. Also consider we have seen a very small sample and vs the worst defense backcourt in the NBA. If it was a vacuum I would agree with Clyde and start the vet. You can always ride the kid for more minutes if he's hot.

But its not a vacuum... there are other factors starting with RJ and Randle. I really love what I see from them. Randle was a great ball mover and he's been a really positive player. RJ was already a good ball handler and his court vision has looked super sharp. Even if his 3 isnt great this year he can rack up a lot of drive and dish assists... if you have shooter. So I think you can ask Quickley to play aggressive D, play on the ball and run a few simple sets. The bottom line is his fundamentals are fantastic. Always has his head up, always plays D with his feet and keeps a hand up.. all the little stuff.

So start him because it makes basketball sense. He's a good defender, he was good on the speedy Cle guards, and man his shot looks good. I dont remember him turning the ball over either on a play that wasnt in the act of attacking. He's just the best fit. You can run the offense through Randle and RJ. I like Burks or Bullock in as a 3&D guy and Mitch as well.

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
franco12
Posts: 34069
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 2/19/2004
Member: #599
USA
12/19/2020  3:37 PM
One game. He looked really good. I start Payton. Quickly can be off the bench, sooner if we’re stinking. After a few, maybe then make. It’s a 72 game season, can’t burn him out in the first 20 games. Let him come along slowly.
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/19/2020  3:49 PM
EwingsGlass wrote:Not sure what the practices looked like, but he won that job in the pre-season games, IMO.
GREAT QUESTION... turns out we got that covered:

Thibs wrote:“You could say that about every player in the roster. But he’s done a really good job. When he’s been on the floor, the team is functioning extremely well. We’ll talk about it as a staff and move forward there. He got our attention in practice. And if you practice well, you usually play well,” Thibodeau said.

“Nothing is ever set in stone. The one thing that you do understand is that you gonna need everybody over the course of the season. The important thing, just like what Quick has shown us, he didn’t play in the first game. But he didn’t change his approach. So when his opportunity came, he was ready and he ran with it,” he added.

Sounds like he killed it in practice and then killed it in the game

source :
https://empiresportsmedia.com/new-york-knicks/immanuel-quickley-quickly-turning-knicks-hope-into-faith/

"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/19/2020  3:53 PM
franco12 wrote:One game. He looked really good. I start Payton. Quickly can be off the bench, sooner if we’re stinking. After a few, maybe then make. It’s a 72 game season, can’t burn him out in the first 20 games. Let him come along slowly.
sure.. but the problem is with Elf/RJ/Burks/Randle/Mitch(or Noel) you have literally one guy who's a consistent threat from 3 and he's league average. There is ZERO spacing and every play is going to end in a contested jumper or RJ or Randle barreling into a paint full of defenders. I had hoped to see Frank develop his shot and win that spot but who knows now and we know Quickly earned it with good play in practice.
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
xblvdels3
Posts: 20736
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/31/2020
Member: #8868
12/19/2020  4:01 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2020  4:03 PM
100 percent on board with Quickley but I agree with Clyde. better to come of the bench for the first 3-5 games. If he looks solid as a substitute and Payton is bricking put him as the starter.

The pacers are aware of what Quickley has been doing. I think teams will test him as he gets scouted. I don’t want him to get waxed and lose confidence by the pros in the first game.

I want to say Quickley was my desired draft pick a month ago.
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27968
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 11/21/2015
Member: #6192
12/19/2020  5:06 PM
I will stick to my 180 degree change of opinion and say he should start. Think someone else said that Payton should be the insurance policy. Which sounds about right. Have him in case the young PG's **** the bed. I would like to see Quick start with either Dennis or Frank as back up. But I know that won't happen. Thibs loves experience. However, do not think it matters if he starts. If quick plays the way he played against Cleveland, he will be playing major minutes and will be finishing games. Only down side, I thought, was that starting the kid would put too much pressure on him and affect his development if it went bad. But watching him play with such confidence, I do not think that will happen.
'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
arkrud
Posts: 32217
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 8/31/2005
Member: #995
USA
12/19/2020  5:29 PM
Why not... It is more entertaining and has a purpose.
But Coaching stuff knows better. They see the practice.
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." Hamlet
fishmike
Posts: 53805
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 7/19/2002
Member: #298
USA
12/19/2020  5:34 PM
arkrud wrote:Why not... It is more entertaining and has a purpose.
But Coaching stuff knows better. They see the practice.
and Thibs has said point blank he's been fantastic in practice
"winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
technomaster
Posts: 23347
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2003
Member: #426
USA
12/19/2020  5:56 PM
I think the Knicks should start Quickley - if he's the best they've got... you pencil in your top 5 players at each position as your starters, do you not? (and he clearly has been the best PG in preseason play)

The only general exception to that rule is if you have a selfish killer aggressive player with a #1 scoring option mentality... that isn't quite franchise material. Then you use them as your 6th man.

The main downside is that you hurt Payton and DSJ's feelings. But Payton's dealt with disappointment before and the message to him is clear that he's not a star (he's a former lotto player on his 4th team that's basically playing close to a min contract!). DSJ... well, he needs to go there's no future for him here, unfortunately.

The upside is that we potentially found our PG of the future, and he didn't even play PG at the college level!

“That was two, two from the heart.” - John Starks
Knixkik
Posts: 35423
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #11
USA
12/19/2020  6:04 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2020  6:06 PM
It’s a tough call because you don’t want him to get overwhelmed and then have to bench him. I’ll start Payton and play them each 24 mpg at first. If Quickley plays the way he is now off the bench than I’ll start him pretty quick. But honestly they have to get a feel for how it would go in terms of locker room and not giving a rookie too much responsibility. I’m sure thibs will feel out the situation and if he’s sure he’s ready than start him. I believe he can definitely be the PG of the future here.
JesseDark
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/9/2003
Member: #467
12/19/2020  6:34 PM
Gonna vote like Clyde said, don’t put that pressure on the rookie. Start Elf and phase him in.
Bring back dee-fense
HOF19
Posts: 20155
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/3/2017
Member: #7569
12/19/2020  6:56 PM
JesseDark wrote:Gonna vote like Clyde said, don’t put that pressure on the rookie. Start Elf and phase him in.

Gotta agree (besides who can disagree with Clyde ?)
KnickDanger
Posts: 24375
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/30/2017
Member: #7578
12/19/2020  7:10 PM
Can't get worked up about this though I too am excited about Quick. Trust Thibs to let this process unfold after such a short training camp.
BigDaddyG
Posts: 39834
Alba Posts: 9
Joined: 1/22/2010
Member: #3049
12/19/2020  7:44 PM
Put him at second half of the season and no, this has nothing to do with the tank
Always... always remember: Less is less. More is more. More is better and twice as much is good too. Not enough is bad, and too much is never enough except when it's just about right. - The Tick
fitzfarm
Posts: 25165
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/28/2010
Member: #3285
12/19/2020  9:00 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2020  9:33 PM
Yes of course you start him , because quick is our best chance of winning ball games. what pressure? he’s playing in empty gyms. Not very different from preseason. Start the kid, he’s only going to get better with more PT and keeps building chemistry with the starting 5 . Will there be bumps in the road I’m sure, but he’s already better then Payton, seriously we’re serious talking about starting brick elf Payton over IQ ??? How is this even debatable.
blkexec
Posts: 28301
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 9/3/2004
Member: #748
12/19/2020  9:59 PM
I love quickley.....I think he's the best pg on the team. But you gotta bring him off the bench to play against the bench players. Start him off dominating second unit, which will help earn his starting stripes amongst his peers.

Hes a likable dude....creates energy and synergy.. use that as a weapon....I can see him finishing games, but no old school coach going to start him opening night.

Born in Brooklyn, Raised in Queens, Lives in Maryland. The future is bright, I'm a Knicks fan for life!
TheGame
Posts: 26632
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/15/2006
Member: #1154
USA
12/19/2020  11:13 PM    LAST EDITED: 12/19/2020  11:13 PM
A good analysis of Quickley’s game.

Trust the Process
ESOMKnicks
Posts: 21420
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/14/2015
Member: #6064
12/20/2020  2:23 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/20/2020  2:24 AM
The Knicks should start Quickley. He makes the impression of being someone who thrives under pressure, confident, relentless, unfazed. Would be unfair to start Payton over him, have the Knicks go 15 points under in the opening minutes, and then insert IQ to clean up this mess. Give him the start, see how he performs in the first 20 games, if it ends up beeing too much to soon, ease up a little.
The only way good players get better is by getting playing time against the league's best. There will be downs, there will be mistakes, but great players overcome them. But will not nurture a great player by coddling him and shielding him from pressure.
Does anyone know the speed readings on Quickley? How fast is he? Anything similar to Jeremy Lin?
ramtour420
Posts: 26260
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 3/19/2007
Member: #1388
Russian Federation
12/20/2020  3:38 AM    LAST EDITED: 12/20/2020  3:39 AM
It's not important who starts, it's who finishes the game for us. Having said that I think IQ can handle starting. Whether or not it's a good idea I don't know. At the end of the day I don't think it's important. I will not go against Clyde. That approach is fine by me. Don't put more pressure on IQ than is already there. However, Thibs is going to start him I think. He has earned it compared to the rest of our PG's.
Everything you have ever wanted is on the other side of fear- George Adair
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Should the Knicks Start Quickley at PG in the first game
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy