http://m.espn.go.com/nba/story?storyId=8594944
1. Real or Hype: The Knicks are the NBA's best team so far.
Mark Haubner, The Painted Area: Hype (but just a little). The Knicks certainly have been the most spectacular success, and are making a clear statement that Amar'e Stoudemire fits best off the bench, but the team's 48 percent 3-point shooting isn't sustainable. Overall, I'd favor the Spurs, who are standing out amid the carnage of predicted Western contenders, even though their shots haven't been falling and Manu Ginobili's barely played.
Beckley Mason, ESPN.com: Real. The Knicks have blown out two playoff teams and rank in the top three in offensive and defensive efficiency. That's pretty good -- no team has finished that high in both categories since the 72-win Bulls in 1996.
Steve McPherson, Hardwood Paroxysm: Hype. Maybe if you go strictly by point differential, the Knicks are the best with a plus-18 in two games, but J.J. Barea is also currently leading the league in offensive efficiency at a ludicrous 156.3. Any numbers you've got right now need to be taken with all the grains of salt and besides, the Knicks' problems have been about consistency, not talent.
Tom Sunnergren, Philadunkia: Real. While most in the business of basketball punditry spent the offseason wringing the hands over the Knicks maladroit handling of the Jeremy Lin and Landry Fields situations, NYK calmly, quietly got better. And yeah, they can shoot the 3 and defend as well as anyone. I'm buying here.
Amin Vafa, Hardwood Paroxysm: Hype. Even if it were real, doesn't everything surrounding the Knicks have to automatically be classified as hype? It's nice to see the team coming together and [Carmelo Anthony] playing well on both ends of the court, but the players' age and the re-addition of STAT will give this team some growing pains sooner rather than later.