[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Isola says Sessions or Tinsley in 1 or 2 days
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum


Author Poll
EnySpree
Posts: 24919
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
Who do you want to run the point for the Knicks in 2009/10 season???
25 votes
67.57%
Sessions at half or all of the mid-level for multi years/sign and trade
5 votes
13.51%
Tinsley for what would probably be a 1 year rental at the vet min
4 votes
10.81%
Re-sign Nate
1 votes
2.7%
Give it to Toney
2 votes
5.41%
Duhon cuz he sucks so good


Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Author Thread
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
7/30/2009  4:05 PM
Frank Isola reports that "within one day or two," Donnie Walsh is expected to decide between making a contract offer to Jamaal Tinsley or Ramon Sessions.

Tinsley is an unrestricted free-agent who will command a smaller salary than the restricted free-agent Sessions. If the Knicks make an offer to Sessions, the Bucks would have seven days to match.

It was reported earlier on Thursday that Walsh and Bucks' GM John Hammond spoke on Wednesday to discuss a possible sign-and-trade.

Daily news via Frank Isola
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
AUTOADVERT
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/30/2009  4:07 PM
Sessions over Tinsley any day of the week but if Walsh goes with Tinsley for a year then it shows he doesn't want to lock up future funds and he's also afraid the Bucks will match an offer for Sessions.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
7/30/2009  4:08 PM
S&T Duhon for Sessions
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
7/30/2009  4:08 PM
I think the PG will be someone else other than sessions, nate, duhorn or tinlsey
The Future. GO KNICKS!
sebstar
Posts: 25698
Alba Posts: 4
Joined: 6/2/2002
Member: #249
USA
7/30/2009  4:09 PM
Aw shyt. This post can definitely come back to haunt me.

I go with Tinsely. We only have to commit to him for a year rather than having to commit five to Sessions. Even if Sessions continues to improve, there will be better PGs to chose from in the future. Dont want to get stuck with another lemon.
My saliva and spit can split thread into fiber and bits/ So trust me I'm as live as it gets. --Royce Da 5'9 + DJ Premier = Hip Hop Utopia
DrAlphaeus
Posts: 23751
Alba Posts: 10
Joined: 12/19/2007
Member: #1781
7/30/2009  4:17 PM
Ain't Tinsley hella out of basketball shape at this point?
Baba Booey 2016 — "It's Silly Season"
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 7/30/2002
Member: #303
7/30/2009  4:24 PM
I don't like what getting Tinsley says for this particular club. He's been a trouble maker and we don't need that. Thats not the message we want to send to our team and potential FA. Basically its saying we will be willing to settle for run of the mill. I wouldve rather signed Marcus Williams than Tinsley. If we FAIL with an MLE[in other words we put our best foot forward with what we can do with Sessions and it does work] than maybe we can look at guys like Tinsley for stop gaps --but I will be dissapointed if we don't give a maximum try--meaning offering a full MLE package.
RIP Crushalot😞
Paladin55
Posts: 24321
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/6/2008
Member: #2098
7/30/2009  4:35 PM
Posted by TMS:

S&T Duhon for Sessions

Yup. Skiles was said to like Duhon when he coached him in Chicago.

Sessions would start, and Nate would play some PG, as well as SG, in his final year on the Knicks, and Douglas will be brought along at his own speed, getting more minutes by the end of the year.
No man is happy without a delusion of some kind. Delusions are as necessary to our happiness as realities- C.N. Bovee
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
7/30/2009  4:38 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

I don't like what getting Tinsley says for this particular club. He's been a trouble maker and we don't need that. Thats not the message we want to send to our team and potential FA. Basically its saying we will be willing to settle for run of the mill. I wouldve rather signed Marcus Williams than Tinsley. If we FAIL with an MLE[in other words we put our best foot forward with what we can do with Sessions and it does work] than maybe we can look at guys like Tinsley for stop gaps --but I will be dissapointed if we don't give a maximum try--meaning offering a full MLE package.

What did Tinsley do in his adult life to call him a trouble maker??? Did he steal any computers in college???
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397
7/30/2009  4:41 PM
Posted by Paladin55:
Posted by TMS:

S&T Duhon for Sessions

Yup. Skiles was said to like Duhon when he coached him in Chicago.

Sessions would start, and Nate would play some PG, as well as SG, in his final year on the Knicks, and Douglas will be brought along at his own speed, getting more minutes by the end of the year.

what if they sign Sessions for a multi-mid level deal AND still sign Tinsley to a vet minimum???....no Nate with Chandler and Hughes @ the 2

Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/30/2009  4:48 PM
Posted by BRIGGS:

I don't like what getting Tinsley says for this particular club. He's been a trouble maker and we don't need that. Thats not the message we want to send to our team and potential FA. Basically its saying we will be willing to settle for run of the mill. I wouldve rather signed Marcus Williams than Tinsley. If we FAIL with an MLE[in other words we put our best foot forward with what we can do with Sessions and it does work] than maybe we can look at guys like Tinsley for stop gaps --but I will be dissapointed if we don't give a maximum try--meaning offering a full MLE package.

My thoughts exactly.
I just hope that people will like me
Bippity10
Posts: 13999
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/26/2004
Member: #574
7/30/2009  4:49 PM
I'm sick and tired of watching guys that have wasted opportunities, been locker room problems or gotten out of shape. Bip says No more!!!!!!!!!!

I promise all of you here that if we sign Tinsley I will spend an entire week in Apalonia!
I just hope that people will like me
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
7/30/2009  5:02 PM
I really want Sessions but the boy can't shot for ****. It's actually quite depressing. Also I am hearing that Milwaukee would match any offer he recieves bc they do not want to lose him for nothing. So we are looking at a sign and trade.

Jared Jeffries and future second round pick for Ramon Sessions
Bonn1997
Posts: 58654
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 2/2/2004
Member: #581
USA
7/30/2009  5:08 PM
Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/30/2009  5:14 PM
Pay Jamaal. Lets see what Chandler and Gallo look like with a point guard that can set em up for more than just long jumpshots
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
7/30/2009  5:36 PM
Posted by Bonn1997:

Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!

Reasons why Bucks would do a deal for Jeffries

1. Jared Jeffries is a Scott Skiles type player.

2. They traded Richard Jefferson and are in need of a small forward. Bruce Bowen won't get it done.

3. Jeffries has 2 years left on his contract and the deal we offer Ramon will be 3-5 years.
McK1
Posts: 26527
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/16/2005
Member: #964
7/30/2009  5:38 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!

Reasons why Bucks would do a deal for Jeffries

1. Jared Jeffries is a Scott Skiles type player.

2. They traded Richard Jefferson and are in need of a small forward. Bruce Bowen won't get it done.

3. Jeffries has 2 years left on his contract and the deal we offer Ramon will be 3-5 years.

Luc Richard Mbah a Moute is already better than Jared jeffries and is cheaper
the stop underrating David Lee movement 1. FIRE MIKE 2. HIRE MULLIN 3. PAY AVERY 4. FREE NATE!!!
Markji
Posts: 22753
Alba Posts: -4
Joined: 9/14/2007
Member: #1673
USA
7/30/2009  5:39 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!

Reasons why Bucks would do a deal for Jeffries

1. Jared Jeffries is a Scott Skiles type player.

2. They traded Richard Jefferson and are in need of a small forward. Bruce Bowen won't get it done.

3. Jeffries has 2 years left on his contract and the deal we offer Ramon will be 3-5 years.
Trading Jeffries for Sessions would just be too good to be true. I think if we threw in a 2nd round pick they might do it?? One can hope!

The difference between fiction and reality? Fiction has to make sense. Tom Clancy - author
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
7/30/2009  5:44 PM
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!

Reasons why Bucks would do a deal for Jeffries

1. Jared Jeffries is a Scott Skiles type player.

2. They traded Richard Jefferson and are in need of a small forward. Bruce Bowen won't get it done.

3. Jeffries has 2 years left on his contract and the deal we offer Ramon will be 3-5 years.

You just listed 3 reasons but in reality there are 0.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Cookdcokehop
Posts: 22452
Alba Posts: 7
Joined: 3/25/2005
Member: #880
USA
7/30/2009  5:47 PM
Posted by Markji:
Posted by Cookdcokehop:
Posted by Bonn1997:

Dude, getting Jared is WORSE than losing Sessions for nothing!

Reasons why Bucks would do a deal for Jeffries

1. Jared Jeffries is a Scott Skiles type player.

2. They traded Richard Jefferson and are in need of a small forward. Bruce Bowen won't get it done.

3. Jeffries has 2 years left on his contract and the deal we offer Ramon will be 3-5 years.
Trading Jeffries for Sessions would just be too good to be true. I think if we threw in a 2nd round pick they might do it?? One can hope!

Jared Jeffries and future second round pick for Ramon Sessions

Shit throw in Saer Sene as well.
Page 1 of 3  1  2  3 Next ›
« Reply To Topic
Isola says Sessions or Tinsley in 1 or 2 days
Forum Index  ›  NY Knicks Forum

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy