[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Do the Knicks make the playoffs after adding Wilcox and Hughes?


Author Poll
crzymdups
Posts: 32018
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
Do the Knicks make the playoffs after adding Wilcox and Hughes? Duhon Hughes Harrington DLee Wilcox bench: Nate, Gallo, QRich, Chandler, Jefferies, possible PEJ i think yes. or we'll be a lot closer.
19 votes
46.34%
Yes, we sneak in.
1 votes
2.44%
Heck no!
18 votes
43.9%
Close, but not enough.
3 votes
7.32%
We should've tanked for a better pick.


Author Thread
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

2/19/2009  2:03 PM
I'd say our chances are still slim, but still increased
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
AUTOADVERT
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/19/2009  2:04 PM
Hughes and Wilcox are known underachievers. Hughes is a terrible chucking guard. Wilcox had never acheieved his potential and was phased out a few times along his career.

So at this point I'm not sure I'd call their additions something that could contribute to a quick turnaround that would guarantee a playoff spot, no, not without seeing their impacts.

Tim was playing a good role for us so in some way we didn't just GET Wilcox/Hughes we gave up some production for them.

Let's see what we do with the roster spots and/if there's one more trade to be had before the day ends.

http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/19/2009  2:10 PM
those guys aren't putting us over the edge... the team has more balance & depth but we're gonna fall short IMO.
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
SupremeCommander
Posts: 34071
Alba Posts: 35
Joined: 4/28/2006
Member: #1127

2/19/2009  2:12 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

Hughes and Wilcox are known underachievers. Hughes is a terrible chucking guard. Wilcox had never acheieved his potential and was phased out a few times along his career.

So at this point I'm not sure I'd call their additions something that could contribute to a quick turnaround that would guarantee a playoff spot, no, not without seeing their impacts.

Tim was playing a good role for us so in some way we didn't just GET Wilcox/Hughes we gave up some production for them.

Let's see what we do with the roster spots and/if there's one more trade to be had before the day ends.

I know you're down on Hughes, and i don't think that's necessarily out of line. What I'm looking forward to though is that what earned Hughes that huge contract in the first place was his role in Eddie Jones running offense and his transition defense. Maybe Hughes can recapture that here
DLeethal wrote: Lol Rick needs a safe space
BigSm00th
Posts: 24504
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 12/9/2001
Member: #178
USA
2/19/2009  2:12 PM
TMS, out of chicago, milwaukee, and NJ, who do you see finishing in 8th?

i like chicago getting salmons and miller (salmons obviously made hughes expendable).
NJ with devin harris has a shot that dude is nasty.
milwaukee i dont think so, i like ramon sessions but without bogut and redd, that'd be pretty tough.
#Knickstaps
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
2/19/2009  2:12 PM
I can't judge these two by how they looked on their previous teams. We've all seen how much of a difference a change of scenery and more important COACHING, can change things. MDA has a way of getting something out of guys with talent. I think Wilcox hasn't come close to maximizing his ability yet. This system could be good for both players.
VDesai
Posts: 43301
Alba Posts: 44
Joined: 10/28/2003
Member: #477
USA
2/19/2009  2:13 PM
I think we are quite a bit closer today than we were yesterday, though there's a long way to go. We really improved our roster balance by filling in some gaps (SG, C) and probably adding 2 starters. Wilcox I think has always been a bit underrated- he scores and rebounds at a really nice, efficient clip in the minutes he gets. Hughes is a bit of a knucklehead, but he has talent and he has the ability to play in this system. He can shoot the 3 a little and he gets a lot of steals. He can play some point from us and gives us some more size at guard which we sorely needed.
Vmart
Posts: 31800
Alba Posts: 1
Joined: 5/23/2002
Member: #247
USA
2/19/2009  2:13 PM
Its all wait and see.
TMS
Posts: 60684
Alba Posts: 617
Joined: 5/11/2004
Member: #674
USA
2/19/2009  2:15 PM
Posted by BigSm00th:

TMS, out of chicago, milwaukee, and NJ, who do you see finishing in 8th?

i like chicago getting salmons and miller (salmons obviously made hughes expendable).
NJ with devin harris has a shot that dude is nasty.
milwaukee i dont think so, i like ramon sessions but without bogut and redd, that'd be pretty tough.

NJ, unless they end up dumping VC for garbage... then i'd say Chicago gets the last seed.

[Edited by - TMS on 02-19-2009 11:15 AM]
After 7 years & 40K+ posts, banned by martin for calling Nalod a 'moron'. Awesome.
tkf
Posts: 36487
Alba Posts: 6
Joined: 8/13/2001
Member: #87
2/19/2009  2:17 PM
Posted by Cosmic:

Hughes and Wilcox are known underachievers. Hughes is a terrible chucking guard. Wilcox had never acheieved his potential and was phased out a few times along his career.

So at this point I'm not sure I'd call their additions something that could contribute to a quick turnaround that would guarantee a playoff spot, no, not without seeing their impacts.

Tim was playing a good role for us so in some way we didn't just GET Wilcox/Hughes we gave up some production for them.

Let's see what we do with the roster spots and/if there's one more trade to be had before the day ends.

I liked tim on that second unit.. he was like a leader on the floor with those guys..

Anyone who sits around and waits for the lottery to better themselves, either in real life or in sports, Is a Loser............... TKF
crzymdups
Posts: 52018
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 5/1/2004
Member: #671
USA
2/19/2009  5:23 PM
Posted by tkf:
Posted by Cosmic:

Hughes and Wilcox are known underachievers. Hughes is a terrible chucking guard. Wilcox had never acheieved his potential and was phased out a few times along his career.

So at this point I'm not sure I'd call their additions something that could contribute to a quick turnaround that would guarantee a playoff spot, no, not without seeing their impacts.

Tim was playing a good role for us so in some way we didn't just GET Wilcox/Hughes we gave up some production for them.

Let's see what we do with the roster spots and/if there's one more trade to be had before the day ends.

I liked tim on that second unit.. he was like a leader on the floor with those guys..

D'Antoni hated Tim, though. We'll see if he likes Wilcox and Hughes, but I don't think D'Antoni will shed too many tears for Tim's departure.
¿ △ ?
Cosmic
Posts: 26570
Alba Posts: 27
Joined: 3/17/2006
Member: #1115
USA
2/19/2009  5:28 PM
Posted by SupremeCommander:
Posted by Cosmic:

Hughes and Wilcox are known underachievers. Hughes is a terrible chucking guard. Wilcox had never acheieved his potential and was phased out a few times along his career.

So at this point I'm not sure I'd call their additions something that could contribute to a quick turnaround that would guarantee a playoff spot, no, not without seeing their impacts.

Tim was playing a good role for us so in some way we didn't just GET Wilcox/Hughes we gave up some production for them.

Let's see what we do with the roster spots and/if there's one more trade to be had before the day ends.

I know you're down on Hughes, and i don't think that's necessarily out of line. What I'm looking forward to though is that what earned Hughes that huge contract in the first place was his role in Eddie Jones running offense and his transition defense. Maybe Hughes can recapture that here

It's going to come down to them wanting to ressurrect their careers - even if just a LITTLE - while here.

Meanwhile both are out of shape, have been shunned by their teams, so it may take some time for them to get it together - and again - that's if they want to.

Either way, like the players that were sent out for them, they're rentals. If they get it going they're better than what we gave up but that is up to them and remains to be seen.
http://popcornmachine.net/ A must-use tool for NBA stat junkies!
K22
Posts: 25143
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/18/2006
Member: #1182
USA
2/19/2009  5:30 PM
Too soon to tell but I trust neither Hughes nor Wilcox at the moment. They both have dubious histories.

It ultimately depends on how uses them.

[Edited by - K22 on 2009-02-19 5:32 PM]
-- the preceding post was brought to you by the letter K and the number 22.
GKFv2
Posts: 26752
Alba Posts: 114
Joined: 1/16/2007
Member: #1259
USA
2/19/2009  5:30 PM
Close but no cigar.
Thank you, Rick Brunson.
Martice
Posts: 20122
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/29/2009
Member: #2463

2/19/2009  5:51 PM
What bothers me about this trade is these are two underachievers coming to a team with no clear leadership. We just traded away any form of leadership that we had on this team when we got rid of Malik Rose.

Only one or two things will happen. These players will not get significant run or a leader will emerge from our core group and lead us and our new additions to the playoffs.

I am the ultimate optimist so I think we will soon see our leader evolve and step forward.


martin
Posts: 79929
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/19/2009  6:21 PM
Posted by Martice:

What bothers me about this trade is these are two underachievers coming to a team with no clear leadership. We just traded away any form of leadership that we had on this team when we got rid of Malik Rose.

Only one or two things will happen. These players will not get significant run or a leader will emerge from our core group and lead us and our new additions to the playoffs.

I am the ultimate optimist so I think we will soon see our leader evolve and step forward.

Rose is an experienced vet, but how you get that we just traded away a valuable leader is beyond me.
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/25/2003
Member: #452
USA
2/19/2009  6:27 PM
I think Duhon is the leader of this team. Rose was brought in to be a leader and he is a good character guy but he was never the right fit for the Knicks. Rose needs to be on a veteran team that needs a guy who knows how to win. It would be nice for him if he could get back to the Spurs next year. My guess is that he will retire. Getting a guy who can be in the rotation and has the possibility to bust out was huge. The Knicks lost nothing in this deal and may have gained alot.
I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
Pharzeone
Posts: 32183
Alba Posts: 14
Joined: 2/11/2005
Member: #871
2/19/2009  6:46 PM
Posted by CrushAlot:

I think Duhon is the leader of this team. Rose was brought in to be a leader and he is a good character guy but he was never the right fit for the Knicks. Rose needs to be on a veteran team that needs a guy who knows how to win. It would be nice for him if he could get back to the Spurs next year. My guess is that he will retire. Getting a guy who can be in the rotation and has the possibility to bust out was huge. The Knicks lost nothing in this deal and may have gained alot.

From my understanding is Duhon is not considered the leader on the team. Most players mentioned Rose. I know Duhon would like to be the leader but isn't considered one. Nate, Lee and Chandler singled out Rose and Q as guys that they listen to. Duhon hasn't done anything yet in his NBA career to justify the sense that someone should listen to him. Say what you want but Rose was on two NBA championship teams. When Tim Duncan considered you a guy he looks up to then I think it is safe to say that others will say so. The only guys that I heard say ok things about Duhon was Noah and a little from Gordon. Duhon is MDA's guy but that doesn't mean he carries significant weight with his teammates.
I don't like to play bad rookies , I like to play good rookies - Mike D'Antoni
Martice
Posts: 20122
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 1/29/2009
Member: #2463

2/19/2009  7:14 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by CrushAlot:

I think Duhon is the leader of this team. Rose was brought in to be a leader and he is a good character guy but he was never the right fit for the Knicks. Rose needs to be on a veteran team that needs a guy who knows how to win. It would be nice for him if he could get back to the Spurs next year. My guess is that he will retire. Getting a guy who can be in the rotation and has the possibility to bust out was huge. The Knicks lost nothing in this deal and may have gained alot.

From my understanding is Duhon is not considered the leader on the team. Most players mentioned Rose. I know Duhon would like to be the leader but isn't considered one. Nate, Lee and Chandler singled out Rose and Q as guys that they listen to. Duhon hasn't done anything yet in his NBA career to justify the sense that someone should listen to him. Say what you want but Rose was on two NBA championship teams. When Tim Duncan considered you a guy he looks up to then I think it is safe to say that others will say so. The only guys that I heard say ok things about Duhon was Noah and a little from Gordon. Duhon is MDA's guy but that doesn't mean he carries significant weight with his teammates.

Wow!!! I couldn't have said this better myself!!

Well done Pharz!!

martin
Posts: 79929
Alba Posts: 108
Joined: 7/24/2001
Member: #2
USA
2/19/2009  7:16 PM
Posted by Pharzeone:
Posted by CrushAlot:

I think Duhon is the leader of this team. Rose was brought in to be a leader and he is a good character guy but he was never the right fit for the Knicks. Rose needs to be on a veteran team that needs a guy who knows how to win. It would be nice for him if he could get back to the Spurs next year. My guess is that he will retire. Getting a guy who can be in the rotation and has the possibility to bust out was huge. The Knicks lost nothing in this deal and may have gained alot.

From my understanding is Duhon is not considered the leader on the team. Most players mentioned Rose. I know Duhon would like to be the leader but isn't considered one. Nate, Lee and Chandler singled out Rose and Q as guys that they listen to. Duhon hasn't done anything yet in his NBA career to justify the sense that someone should listen to him. Say what you want but Rose was on two NBA championship teams. When Tim Duncan considered you a guy he looks up to then I think it is safe to say that others will say so. The only guys that I heard say ok things about Duhon was Noah and a little from Gordon. Duhon is MDA's guy but that doesn't mean he carries significant weight with his teammates.

how do you know this?
Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
Do the Knicks make the playoffs after adding Wilcox and Hughes?

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy