You really don't understand. while some companies were in business in Germany and manufactured or operated there like Mercedes- others like Allianz were direct participants in the activities directed against the Jewish people. They literally took from the Jews profited from their actions and were lated cited for those activities. It is true that they paid millions in reparation but those reparations were paid under duress not voluntarily. Companies like DeBeers never took actions against particular people but those people were nonetheless hurt by those actions-it did matter to DeBeers that the mine worker were black-it could have been poor whites it was just that most of the mine workers happen to have been black. Many American companies have been guilty of far greater -taking actions which hurt groups- blacks, women, jews catholics and many of these actions have been ameriorated by lawsuits and legislation.
Actually I really do understand, so please don't be condescending.
I think I bring up a very good point with Mercedes. It seems you wouldn't mind them having their name on a stadium. You draw the distinction that Allianz was actively backing the Nazi party, while Mercedes just profited greatly from the holocaust. That is a difference, but I don't think it is truly important. That is like saying it is okay to profit fomr misery as long as you are not the author of that misery. I don't see it that way. And I bet if we took a real good look we would find Mercedes was more than just a contractor for the Nazi party.
The fact is the company Allianz still exists. They have paid reparations etc. but that really doesn't matter to me, it doesn't change what they did or their role in the suffering of millions of people. But if Allianz still exists and they can sell their product here they should be able to advertise, just like Mercedes, DeBeers, or the other companies you alluded to who are U.S. Corporations that have engaged in or been responsible for terrible actions both past and present.
I know this is a hot-button issue for you because I have read your posts when it comes to this stuff before. And I think you really are against having the name Allianz plastered on a stadium, which will bring up painful memories for some. Fair enough. But objectively since they have not been shut down they have every right to advertise and endorse. If you don't think they do, the issue is not whether they should be on a stadium, but instead, should they be forced to close up shop because of their role in WWII 60-70 years ago. And to be fair, we should do an audit of a lot of other companies and shut them down too.
oohah