Nate's still our best 3 point shooter, so I think you have to keep him until there's a better option.

Posted by nixluva:

I think the presence of Nichols is part of what will makes Nate expendable. We have 2 PG's who are bigger and more suited to be distributors, in Mardy and Dickau. In essence we don't need Nate. He's a good spark plug off the bench, but he's a luxury, not a necessity. I like Nate, but i'd let him go at this point, cuz I think we have guys that fit the team concept better.

I agree Nix.

Mardy is a nice backup PG and Dickau is a borderline starter if he can keep himself healthy (which he hasn't been able to do.) Saying that, I'd be done with Nate, I love Nates hustle and energy but half the time he can't keep himself under control. He's a nice trade chip since we already have Mardy and Dicau and I would certainly package him for someone like Artest.

I'm excited to see dickau become a staple in knickville. Sometimes it takes guys years for their bodies to adapt to the rigors of the NBA season. Hopefully this is the case for Dan.

I really like the dudes game to tell you the truth. He has a change of pace type of game. He isn't fast but he just knows how to play angles and change speeds. People here like to talk percentages but the guy has been injured and has had mixed minutes. In the few spurts he has been healthy and playing big minutes he produced. I'm excited for the guy.

As far as Nate? I wish he could have a chance to shine in ny. Where ever he goes, he will. Sactown looks to be in transition. Maybe he goes there and finds a spot. Next to Kevin Martin.

You know Nates game is very similiar to bibby when you think about it. Nate just plays out of control. Anyway, good luck to him, elsewhere.