If the Knicks could get rid of Eisleys contract they would. Face it hes stuck with us. Frank will be the one to go next year when we trade for a big man.

I love the prospect of trading Eisley. But him and Shandon Anderson are two of the most over paid players in the league. It is ridulous.
Unfortunatley it will be difficult to part with them because of their contracts. A scenrio that I proposed before the trade deadline was trading Eisley to Seattle for in a deal including one of their over-priced big men. Seattle needs a point guard and the Knicks need big men. With Seattle making the trade for Ray Allen they have no cap space to pay one of the big free agent point guards. It would be nice not having to take back big contracts of players who aren't worth it, but at least we would be bringing in a player to fill a position of need. In addition, we would have Charlie for 1 more year, which will ease the transition of Frankie and Milos. How about in training camp we allow Frankie and Milos battle it out to see who is the starter, with Charlie backing up. But if everything said about Milos is true then he should be the starter hands down. All of this can be done, but the question remains whether Layden would part with players that he brought in; essentially stating that he made a mistake (which he did) in signing that player.

Posted by falcindor:

If the Knicks could get rid of Eisleys contract they would. Face it hes stuck with us. Frank will be the one to go next year when we trade for a big man.

Believe me after the season, they'll have a better chance on trading eisley or whomever else on the knicks. As for Frank Williams, i don't think the knicks would risk unloading their #1 pick unless it was necessary. If they did trade him for a big man, he would be an add- on based on his tiny contract.