of course. at the very least one of them is bound to. hey islesfan do you know what you should do? you should keep track of all how well all the top rookies do next year in this thread and then keep ressurecting it for next season like you did with the "pencil curry in for 20 & 10" thread.

Well the "Pencil Curry in for 20 & 10" thread lent itself to being resurrected like that since it was a prediction on his entire season.

And don't kid yourself. If Curry had come anywhere close to 20&10, more than a few people on this board would have resurrected it a lot more often than I did which was exactly quarterly, regardless of whether he had just played a good or bad game.

As for your suggestion, that's not a bad idea. But if everybody here agrees that they believe that at least 1 player from the top 20 picks will be better than Curry there won't be a need to.

it's tough to say...i still haven't declared for the draft yet.