|
PresIke
Posts: 27671
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 7/26/2001
Member: #33 USA
|
I included Ewing only because I know a lot of Knick fans back then used to whine about how he could never "take us over the top" and was "overrated" because "it's all about winning the title." Do I agree? No, but I figured there might be people who still see things that way.
Like I stated initially, I would have loved to put more choices on the list. I thought about adding Marbury, but I wondered that because he had never accomplished much with teams (other than Minnesota w/KG and a playoff exit with the Suns) that I thought more people would see the rest of the choices I listed as having higher expectations placed upon them for helping the Knicks make some major turnaround than Marbury. Clearly there were expectations for Steph, but I KNOW there are many fans who actually had very low expectations of him, while those that I listed did not have such a poor record before joining the Knicks, which is why I think they had higher expectations placed upon them.
McDyess could certainly fit in there as well, but the re-injury of his knee in pre-season (after looking so good) with us, plus already being damaged goods was a big warning, after REPEATED attempts by the Knicks being welling to take on damaged goods seems to have lowered expectations very quickly.
To me, after acquiring LJ, who came off of the back injury w/Charotte with NO HOPS, when that was a major part of his game I was naive (with several other fans, I believe) to think he was going to be the same player who used to torch us with the Hornets. When we got McDyess, that naivite was far less of a factor, and the press had jumped on that as well, calling it a VERY risky move, when the LJ move got far less criticism.
The Knicks should have learned from the LJ acquisition...although I loved what he brought to the Knicks as a leader, playing his heart out, and on several other ocassions some of those great moments...despite making all of those nice post moves only to get his shot blocked all of the time because he couldn't jump anymore. Which is why I didn't vote for him, but if you think about what Knick fans probably expected of him, his contributions weren't anywhere near expectations.
Tim Thomas is in the same category as most of the other players that arrived here under Isiah by having tainted and inconsisent careers. Only THE most hopeful of Knick fans would put him abouve someone like Chales Smith who was in his prime and scoring 20ppg on a team that went to the playoffs under Larry Brown.
[Edited by - PresIke on 03-07-2006 7:32 PM]
Forum Po Po and #33 for a reason...
|