[ IMAGES: Images ON turn off | ACCOUNT: User Status is LOCKED why? ]

Starting Five


Author Poll
Knight
Posts: 2775
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
I couldn't list all the possibilities but assuming everyone is healthy and Marbury, Q, and Curry start at some position, what other 2 players do you want joining them?
8 votes
22.22%
Craw, Davis
4 votes
11.11%
Craw, Frye
1 votes
2.78%
Craw, Rose/MoT
7 votes
19.44%
Ariza, Frye
8 votes
22.22%
Ariza, Davis
1 votes
2.78%
Ariza, Rose/MoT
6 votes
16.67%
Barnes, Davis
1 votes
2.78%
Barnes, Frye


Author Thread
nyk4ever
Posts: 41010
Alba Posts: 12
Joined: 1/12/2005
Member: #848
USA
10/29/2005  12:37 PM
I chose Ariza and Davis. Wouldn't be against Frye starting either but I think as we stand now Curry needs a big rebounder starting alongside him.
"OMG - did we just go on a two-trade-wining-streak?" -SupremeCommander
AUTOADVERT
Knight
Posts: 22775
Alba Posts: 2
Joined: 7/21/2005
Member: #968
10/29/2005  12:42 PM
Based on experience and talent I chose Craw and Davis--but I don't think Marbury and Craw compliment each other very well since they both have a scoring mentality and need the ball. If I chose over again I would choose Ariza and Davis--since their defense and rebounding would compliment the offense Marb/Q/Curry supplies.
"He only went to Georgia Tech for one year, and that's an engineering school." -LB
EnySpree
Posts: 44919
Alba Posts: 138
Joined: 4/18/2003
Member: #397

10/29/2005  12:48 PM
I think Antonio and Barnes will get the nod. Larry Brown is fair. Both those guys deserve to start.

Don't get me wrong though....Frye, Lee, Butler, Ariza, and Nate deserve their time too.....I just would start Davis and Barnes until Q can get in game shape and Frye proves he is ready.

[Edited by - enyspree on 10-29-2005 12:55 PM]
Subscribe to my Podcast https://youtube.com/c/DiehardknicksPodcast https://twitter.com/DiehardknicksPC https://instagram.com/diehardknickspodcast
WOODMANnYk
Posts: 22417
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 6/30/2002
Member: #529
USA
10/29/2005  1:38 PM
Larry said Q is too small @ the 3 position.. He prefers him @ the 2 spot.

The small forward position is a big concern. Quentin Richardson last night missed his fifth straight preseason game and Brown indicated he may be too small for the position anyway. Newcomer Matt Barnes (10 points, 5 of 8) continued to impress at SF last night and could start Wednesday, as Penny Hardaway looked awful. from ny post :


I think Larry is gonna go defense, with Antonio @ the 4 and either Ariza or Barnes @ the 3 position..

Whoever is playing the 3 looks to be temporarily cause Zeke is looking for a veteran player via a trade to play the 3..
The Future. GO KNICKS!
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/29/2005  5:01 PM
My wish is to see Crawfford traded immediately. We will never be set at the SG position until we trade him away. He is too small to play the 2...Q will fit that position nicely next to Marburry, because Q is not a ball handler and will complement Marb's game very nicely. I know that there are a lot of Crawff fans on this board, but I don't understand why. He can't penetrate like neither Kobe or TMac, and he can't shoot with a high percentage. The SG position is designed for guys that are strong enough to penetrate or efficient enough to shoot the ball....Crawff is neither.
The true Knickabocker..........
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/29/2005  5:03 PM
Craw & Davis. Those are the two best options right now.

Barnes should not even be in this poll.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Panos
Posts: 30444
Alba Posts: 3
Joined: 1/6/2004
Member: #520
10/29/2005  5:09 PM
Well I chose Ariza and Davis, but I still think ultimately we'll be seeing Lee and Davis.
I know I'm in the minority, but I'm sticking to my guns.
AkiliNYK
Posts: 20012
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/17/2005
Member: #991

10/29/2005  5:10 PM
I would like to see Barnes and Frye gives us a shot blocking presents and Barnes is more ready to start than Ariza. Rizy is just not there yet
I welcome the knicks youth movment its refreshing to see players without pig cartelege in there knee playing for us.
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/29/2005  5:11 PM
Barnes and Davis.....
The true Knickabocker..........
boomann
Posts: 20685
Alba Posts: 26
Joined: 6/29/2005
Member: #938
USA
10/29/2005  6:01 PM
Ariza and Frye
"We need another shot blocker and we need more girth in the middle, once that happens we have a chance to be a pretty decent team" Isiah on draft night
nixluva
Posts: 56258
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 10/5/2004
Member: #758
USA
10/29/2005  6:49 PM
I went for Ariza and Davis, cuz of Defense. I think that is a rugged lineup and has just enough scoring and defense.
I wouldn't mind Frye, but not yet. He's not ready for the starting job yet.
diderotn
Posts: 25657
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 4/15/2004
Member: #650
USA
10/29/2005  9:50 PM
I can see George Lynch added to our roster...that would give us 3 capable SF (Reezy, Lynch and Barnes). I sort of like this young Barnes dude, he has a pretty jumper and he defends pretty well.
The true Knickabocker..........
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
10/29/2005  9:56 PM
Posted by Solace:

Craw & Davis. Those are the two best options right now.

Barnes should not even be in this poll.


Barnes was a critical bench player last year for Sac Town...when Webber went down last year, he averaged some points and all around #'s when he got time.. I'm telling you this kid could be like Jimmy Jackson at SF with better defense.

http://fantasybasketball.usatoday.com/index.php?sport=pbkball&type=gamelog&name=1270


[Edited by - joec32033 on 10-29-2005 10:03 PM]
~You can't run from who you are.~
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/29/2005  9:09 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Solace:

Craw & Davis. Those are the two best options right now.

Barnes should not even be in this poll.


Barnes was a critical bench player last year for Sac Town...when Webber went down last year, he averaged some points and all around #'s when he got time.. I'm telling you this kid could be like Jimmy Jackson at SF with better defense.

http://fantasybasketball.usatoday.com/index.php?sport=pbkball&type=gamelog&name=1270


[Edited by - joec32033 on 10-29-2005 10:03 PM]

Right. You said the key words: bench player. Why would we even consider him as a starter when we have other players who have proven they deserve that role over a guy who wasn't even a consideration until preseason?
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
10/29/2005  9:15 PM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Solace:

Craw & Davis. Those are the two best options right now.

Barnes should not even be in this poll.


Barnes was a critical bench player last year for Sac Town...when Webber went down last year, he averaged some points and all around #'s when he got time.. I'm telling you this kid could be like Jimmy Jackson at SF with better defense.

http://fantasybasketball.usatoday.com/index.php?sport=pbkball&type=gamelog&name=1270


[Edited by - joec32033 on 10-29-2005 10:03 PM]

Right. You said the key words: bench player. Why would we even consider him as a starter when we have other players who have proven they deserve that role over a guy who wasn't even a consideration until preseason?


What SF has proved that he deserves to start more than him? Q? He's hurt and I believe that Larry is right and he is better suited for SG....Ariza? He is the EXACT same player he was last year, and Barnes is a more well rounded player. Penny? Not on this team. I think Lee can play SF but noone else does so that rules him out. We manage to get Miles start him, I'd be cool with that (until Barnes outplays him too).

If we had a better option I'd agree with you, but truth is we don't and noone IMO has earned at that position, Except for Barnes.
~You can't run from who you are.~
Solace
Posts: 30002
Alba Posts: 20
Joined: 10/30/2003
Member: #479
USA
10/29/2005  10:40 PM
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Solace:

Craw & Davis. Those are the two best options right now.

Barnes should not even be in this poll.


Barnes was a critical bench player last year for Sac Town...when Webber went down last year, he averaged some points and all around #'s when he got time.. I'm telling you this kid could be like Jimmy Jackson at SF with better defense.

http://fantasybasketball.usatoday.com/index.php?sport=pbkball&type=gamelog&name=1270


[Edited by - joec32033 on 10-29-2005 10:03 PM]

Right. You said the key words: bench player. Why would we even consider him as a starter when we have other players who have proven they deserve that role over a guy who wasn't even a consideration until preseason?


What SF has proved that he deserves to start more than him? Q? He's hurt and I believe that Larry is right and he is better suited for SG....Ariza? He is the EXACT same player he was last year, and Barnes is a more well rounded player. Penny? Not on this team. I think Lee can play SF but noone else does so that rules him out. We manage to get Miles start him, I'd be cool with that (until Barnes outplays him too).

If we had a better option I'd agree with you, but truth is we don't and noone IMO has earned at that position, Except for Barnes.

First of all, going with this poll, if you assume Q is there, then you have to pencil Q in. Others have said that Q can play SF. While I think that makes us too small in the backcourt, it's not out of the question that he would start at SF. If so, Craw is the only reasonable choice for SG. Ariza is better than Barnes, and so is Crawford. I don't really understand the debate. Even George Lynch, if we sign him, could fit in well at starting SF if Q is out. There's a -3% chance of Barnes starting to begin the season. I think he was a decent pick up, but let's not go crazy. If Barnes is better than I'm giving him credit for, maybe he'd make starter by the end of the year (although I already see him being highly overrated on this board and don't see him as a starter quality player). But to think that it's realistic that a guy is going to be the starting SF, purely based on potential seems pretty silly to me.

And yes, if all else fails, you'd have to start Penny over Barnes. Barnes has played well, but not well enough to warrant a starting job.
Wishing everyone well. I enjoyed posting here for a while, but as I matured I realized this forum isn't for me. We all evolve. Thanks for the memories everyone.
Ira
Posts: 24692
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 8/14/2001
Member: #91
10/30/2005  3:50 AM
I think that it's a given that Davis will start at the beginning of the season. Not only is he a veteran who knows what he's doing out there, but he's played for Larry Brown in Indiana and could help the team adjust to what Brown wants them to do.

Larry has said that Q is too short for small forward, so the fifth starter will probably be Ariza. He's a defensive ace who reminds some people of Tayshaun Prince, he rebounds well and is learning to add some offense.

Larry will go with a three guard offense which means Craw backing up the two starting guards. There will be three forward/centers off the bench. Fry will be one of them. Lee or Barnes will back up Trevor. Butler or James will back up Curry.
JUNKMEIN
Posts: 20401
Alba Posts: 0
Joined: 11/14/2004
Member: #797
10/30/2005  6:18 AM
I voted Ariza & Davis. That allows us to bring Frye and Barnes off the bench. I disagree with Barnes' style of play not warranting a shot at starting however. With as many new faces on this squad there's no one except Marbury that's automatic. Barnes has been a stud this preseason. He's got length, nice form and range on his jumper and he's tenacious on defense.

Contrary to popular belief, the 3 guard lineup in Detroit was hardly a 3 guard lineup. It was actually a 3 guard rotation. When Vinny came in (and he was always the 3 guard off the bench) one of the big two (Isiah or Dumars) would take a seat. Isiah has stated countless times that Vinny would come in the game and get hot and I wouldn't see the floor again until the 3rd Quarter. Marbury, Crawford and Nate (who will be just fine) should be our 3 guard rotation. Q should allow us to take advantage of certain mismatches by jumping between the 2 and 3.

Lineup:

PG/Backup: Marbury/Nate (give this kid minutes) & Crawford
SG/Backup: Crawford/Q (when healthy he can swap with Crawford)
SF/Backup: Ariza, Barnes/Q (spot duty) & Lee
PF/Backup: Davis/Frye (in quick to play with Curry, James or Davis) Lee/MoT/Rose
C/Backup: Curry/Davis (shift from the PF slot)/James/Frye( at C with Lee at Pf & Ariza at SF for our press team)

Penny, Rose & MoT need to ride that pine hard.


[Edited by - Junkmein on 10-30-2005 06:26 AM]
joec32033
Posts: 30631
Alba Posts: 37
Joined: 2/3/2004
Member: #583
USA
10/30/2005  7:43 AM
Posted by Solace:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Solace:
Posted by joec32033:
Posted by Solace:

Craw & Davis. Those are the two best options right now.

Barnes should not even be in this poll.


Barnes was a critical bench player last year for Sac Town...when Webber went down last year, he averaged some points and all around #'s when he got time.. I'm telling you this kid could be like Jimmy Jackson at SF with better defense.

http://fantasybasketball.usatoday.com/index.php?sport=pbkball&type=gamelog&name=1270


[Edited by - joec32033 on 10-29-2005 10:03 PM]

Right. You said the key words: bench player. Why would we even consider him as a starter when we have other players who have proven they deserve that role over a guy who wasn't even a consideration until preseason?


What SF has proved that he deserves to start more than him? Q? He's hurt and I believe that Larry is right and he is better suited for SG....Ariza? He is the EXACT same player he was last year, and Barnes is a more well rounded player. Penny? Not on this team. I think Lee can play SF but noone else does so that rules him out. We manage to get Miles start him, I'd be cool with that (until Barnes outplays him too).

If we had a better option I'd agree with you, but truth is we don't and noone IMO has earned at that position, Except for Barnes.

First of all, going with this poll, if you assume Q is there, then you have to pencil Q in. Others have said that Q can play SF. While I think that makes us too small in the backcourt, it's not out of the question that he would start at SF. If so, Craw is the only reasonable choice for SG. Ariza is better than Barnes, and so is Crawford. I don't really understand the debate. Even George Lynch, if we sign him, could fit in well at starting SF if Q is out. There's a -3% chance of Barnes starting to begin the season. I think he was a decent pick up, but let's not go crazy. If Barnes is better than I'm giving him credit for, maybe he'd make starter by the end of the year (although I already see him being highly overrated on this board and don't see him as a starter quality player). But to think that it's realistic that a guy is going to be the starting SF, purely based on potential seems pretty silly to me.

And yes, if all else fails, you'd have to start Penny over Barnes. Barnes has played well, but not well enough to warrant a starting job.

I see Q as the starter at SG and Steph at the point. I see Jamal playing better at the one this preseason than he played at almost anytime last season at the 2. I never considered Q a SF at any time because of his size.

As for Barnes being overhyped and overrated on this board, I can say the exact same thing about Trev. I like Trev but alot of people are giving this kid credit because he is our first true prospect and homegrown talent in forever. Trev is athletic as hell, a great finisher and a good defender, and he seems to play better in an open court offense Trev doesn't really pass and his jumper has minimally improved since last year. Barnes isn't as athletic, and isn't as great a finisher but he can play in the half court or open court, he can actually pass the ball, he has a mid--range jumper, and is just a good if not better defender than Trev plus he can body up on bigger players.

Bottom line to me is Barnes is a more versatile and at this point a more complete player than Trev is, and yes, also a better player. Both of these players also were 2nd round picks so they are from the same boat in that respect.

Why on God's green earth would you start Penny over anyone? He is hurt and undependable. I can see him being our backup point if we can't bring anyone in. There is absoltely no reason I can fathom to start Penny.

As for getting Lynch, I think this is how it is going to play out....We are going to pull a 2 for one for Miles so we don't have to cut anyone(Miles and Ratliff or Patterson--I'll go with Ratliff for now for Penny and Rose), we'll bring in Miles(who will then eventually start at the 3) and sign Lynch as a backup.

Curry/Ratliff/James
Davis/Frye/Lee/Butler
Miles/Ariza/Lynch
Q/Craw
Marbury/Penny/Nate
~You can't run from who you are.~
Killa4luv
Posts: 27769
Alba Posts: 51
Joined: 6/23/2002
Member: #261
USA
10/30/2005  10:35 AM
Barnes & Davis.

They are good defensively.

Barnes can shoot, Ariza cannot.

Craw is the 6th man.
Starting Five

©2001-2025 ultimateknicks.comm All rights reserved. About Us.
This site is not affiliated with the NY Knicks or the National Basketball Association in any way.
You may visit the official NY Knicks web site by clicking here.

All times (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time.

Terms of Use and Privacy Policy