Vmart wrote:fishmike wrote:Vmart wrote:fishmike wrote:Prolly why he wants to go play for Thibs
Best joke yet.
mom gave you posting privs back? Thanks for cleaning your room
Moms are awesome. Am I the only one here who thinks we are concentrating on the wrong position rather than Brunson we should be looking at Ayton. This team needs a floor spreading center. The Knicks have point guards Quickly and McBride.
I don’t understand the Knicks they always think grass is greener else where they don’t see the Mavs took a lot of time watering it. Something Knicks refuse to do with what they have. Ayton is the player the Knicks should be concentrating on or both Brunson and Ayton. I like Mitch but he is to restricted with his offense.
But that grass might not be available. IF so what is the price of it? ITs a nice concept and one I agree with, but what will Ayton sign for, and what will PHX want in return. If you get a sign and trade for Brunson, we might have the space to sign Ayton and wait them out. But will we have the pulp to do a deal. meanwhile, time would be ticking. Brunson might be down with that.
on a side note, Read that Miami will not be meeting with Brunson. With Davis Bertains there is no need to bring on Duncan.
Chemistry: Dinwiddie and Bertans for KP. Mavs took off after that. Not a good haul back for Dallas on paper with KP being the best player but thats how it works.
Chemistry: EF bugged out Randle early in the season. Did it smooth itself out? Randle did not but was he being a diva for lack of execution of players. Read Randle held the ball too long because EF did not make his cuts. new team, new schematic. Randle being an Ass? Or justified? Fans give their impressions but I have not read anything concrete about this other than it was a thing then.
Get Mitch settled with a long term deal, Brunson to lead the floor, define Randle and have buy in, extend RJ, and you might have a good core to build on. Its June 30th, I don't see the minutes yet because I can't see the final roster.