Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
Chandler
Posts: 25988 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
7/9/2019 6:02 PM
CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: meaning we spent 20 million on a player without knowing he had a bum foot and the agent did tell us; so now he complements us because we're not fully dropping the deal for fraud! (5)(5)
|
martin
Posts: 68542 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
7/9/2019 6:43 PM
Chandler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Jesus dude, stop being so short sighted and whatnot, you are really exposing yourself Knicks, just like any team, perform physicals on players before signing them. He obviously failed and now both sides are figuring out what to do Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
Chandler
Posts: 25988 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
7/9/2019 10:04 PM
martin wrote:Chandler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: if the deal was contingent on a physical and he failed the deal should be dead. failed condition precedent When he's supposedly better we sign him then if healthy and if we still want him. What's to figure out. we suffered a opportunity cost by thinking his money was tied up when it shouldn't have been I don't think this is over-reacting. Sorry if it comes across that way (5)(5)
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
7/10/2019 3:38 AM
Chandler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: We didn't spend $20mil because the deal isn't finalised until a player passes his physical- you offer a contract contingent on them passing a physical- that's a basic fundamental, again I don't know why you're pretending not o know this (just like you were pretending the vice president of bball ops makes the draft choices). There's plenty of stuff you can criticize this team for without just making stuff up. |
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
7/10/2019 3:41 AM
Chandler wrote:martin wrote:Chandler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: All FA deals (and traded) are contingent on a player passing a medical (unless that requirement is waived- i.e if you already know the player is injured). The deal is dead. Now we're looking at offering him a room exemption as an act of good will, likely because part of the reason for signing him was his personality/presence, so even if he can't play this whole season, he's worth having around (remember, otherwise that roster spot is going to Lance Thomas or Vince) |
Chandler
Posts: 25988 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
7/10/2019 8:34 AM
smackeddog wrote:Chandler wrote:martin wrote:Chandler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Nothing is being made up. that's what a "condition precedent" means -- it's not a "real" deal unless this condition (e.g., physical) is satisfied first. There are other forms of conditions, such as condition subsequent, which say in effect this deal is dead if you do something prohibited after the fact, e.g., commit some crime... Having said that, there are always negotiations before that happens and thus must be conducted in good faith and candor. As part of that one would reasonably expect someone on the Knicks askedd -- Are you healthy? among a host of other things. Obviously this would be followed up with the physical itself as part of due diligence. Entities wouldn't be satisfying their fiduciary duties without that DD -- even if they believed the guy 100% -- meaning even as a C-level executive he could be legally accountable. IMO even if everything was done in good faith etc. (e.g., reggie and his agent didn't know about an injury), if he failed a physical the Knicks should just walk away from the deal, and talk when he's healthy. the benefit of this deal was a 1+1 structure. He's Bullock, not KD, If there is any evidence that he knew about an injury and didn't pipe up about it, the Knicks should be furious -- there was an opportunity cost in thinking they had 10+ mill of cap space tied up with him And FWIW regarding your other post, there's nothing being made up about AGM. Of course the GM has final say, but it's ridiculous to think that any GM goes solo. It's also ridiculous to read into any of my posts that I was saying these were Perry's picks -- and Perry's alone. Perry's own web page acknowledges or attempts to take credit for his roles in drafting and building rosters. Now if you don't like his record -- fine, pretend he had nothing to do with it. (He actually had much better suggestions but the GM over-ruled; he had no say in dumping Victor before he was good) We hired him for some other reason. If you like his record, you should be happy because that's probably a pretty good indicator of what to expect going forward. (I acknowledge his success with Knicks second rounders and UDFAs; I am unimpressed with his prior record -- not horrible but far from great IMO). As a Knicks fan I would much prefer that he excel and that all my concerns be wrong. (5)(5)
|
Nalod
Posts: 68632 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
7/10/2019 1:07 PM
Chandler wrote:smackeddog wrote:Chandler wrote:martin wrote:Chandler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: You write it, you own it. |