fishmike wrote:Chandler wrote:If we can't get max guys who play above max value, we should be focusing on draft alone OR WORST CASE short term dealsC'mon guys you know better. If we get some FAs to merely improve to .500 ball (which itself will be hard need +24) we'll be stuck with iffy draft picks. If we don't get to .500 then why bother with the FA and handcuffing our flexibility
We need to stay disciplined and avoid the temptation of mere improvement which really risks mediocrity.
you dont look at predicting wins and losses. You look at whether it makes sense to add guys and what that commitment will look like.
1) there should be no fear of slow progress hurting us in the draft. If we learned anything from this last draft its that tanking has huge perils. Of ALL the bottom teams we were the only ones who stayed high. Middleton is a top 20 player, or very close. Randle could be a great short term look (2 years $40mm should get him). This is how you get better. You dont go from bad to good by staying flexible. You do it by adding talent.
I know folks differ wildly on this but people fall too in love with flexible.
I'm in love with flexible. We can add (overpriced) talent and improve and get picks. E.g., grab Dennis or Roberson from OKC. Our talent improves and we get a pick. Much better strategy IMO
We are in a salary-capped league. That means you need to focus on value so you end up with more talent for the same price as everyone else. The only reliable bargains are drafting and getting max guys playing above their max salary (e.g., Lebron, KD, Kawhi etc.)
We also should be priortizing people who are professionals. Getting a couple extra wins won't matter much; getting guys who will show our young guys the right way has a premium