Jmpasq wrote:Do you think our timeline is all screwed up now with Porzingis getting maxed? Now we are foeced to push the envelope or he pushes his way out the door. We will lose a chance at worthwile compensation for him. As much as I would like to believe we are going to pull out of this we are still paying for past mistakes. I'm worried this stupid ass franchise will give Mudiay a 4 year 60 million dollar deal.
If you mean a situation like Orlando and Dwight Howard ( i.e. where the risk of losing the "franchise player" meant the GM in place, trying to save his own job, would make bad market based decisions in trades, to try to appease the player to stay out of desperation, then it's entirely possible that might happen.
The most openly dangerous of those scenarios is John Wall. It wouldn't take much to get him, the Knicks are a cash rich team in general ( i.e. luxury/repeater tax considerations), he and Zinger would get this team to the playoffs every year, and just that alone might convince Zinger to stay and resign a max.
Of course, the most ideal situation was the OKC Thunder, four young guys who broke out together on staggered rookie deals.
I think the injuries sort of mitigate the situation both ways. Zinger is going to be more prone to look towards long term security. That he hasn't truly broken out because of said injuries means his leverage to hold a franchise hostage ( like D Howard who took the Magic to a Finals run) is not as strong. The injuries also create a large soft cover with the media if the Knicks end up trading him if out of other options.
I don't think any practical timeline issues are at risk here over Zinger's possible demand for a trade down the road. Or demand to leverage himself as LeGM type. The issues are already in place from the Hardaway/Noah contracts. If the goal is to contend and build a consistent contender, you need a really really clean cap sheet. In this regard, I don't think the Knicks can do that given the current situation. I do think however if the goal is to dig out a fun team to watch that fans love and can enjoy ( think Suns SSOL under Pringles, never going to win a ring, but fun to watch and will make the playoffs consistently), then this is still entirely possible with the current situation. And that's not such a horrible consolation prize in the end.
Given how many "elite" guys are being traded now, and the reality of supermaxes like Wall and Griffin going to blow up in the faces of many teams, I don't think Zinger really has too much leverage to demand certain quick fixes to the roster. I've been to a few Sloan Sports Conferences, one year, they had a former NBA GM there, and he was pretty candid informally. He said it's the kind of job where you know you will be fired one day no matter what you do, so if you are gonna get fired anyway, you might as well do what you think is right to build the team in a way you believe in. After what happened with Hinkie, my take is more of the progressive GMs will take this approach. Former players like Otis Smith and Chris Mullin, who networked their way in to the front office, are going to be more likely to make the desperate move, they don't have the deep skill set to actually function as a GM, and see the role as a one shot deal. Guys like Perry or Rich Cho are an entirely different situation. They'll get another chance because they actually understand how to do the job.