Nalod wrote:Phil is gone. Not everything he did was bad, or good. KP reaction to things and missing the meeting was bad. Phil's reaction was worse. He reacted like a coach scorned. A good GM would fire his coach as unicorns are not common. I thought Hornacek was OK but direction we in with Fiz better. And its way too early to even comment on Fiz. Things are in disarray.
My wife is on sabbatical leave catching up on life and has taken the task to clean out closets and basement. Its a mess. Pulling stuff out, sorting it thru makes a mess. In time we'll lighten up and reorganize. Maybe this is true of what Fiz is doing with this team.
Biggest issue in my mind was that -- to use an NFL analogy -- Phil was best suited as a director of football operations akin to Coughlin with the Jags. He should have specified a philosophy and culture, hired GM and at least been involved with coach. To a large degree this is what he was "supposed" to be as President
The reality was different. Instead he acted as a GM when he wanted to (sometimes to bad effect), and zoned out when bored. Our plan was fine; our execution sucked
Maybe our history would have been completely different if Kerr didn't back out of verbal deal; maybe different if Phil hired a star GM who was a kindred spirit philosophically yet someone Phil respected enough that he would listen if the GM told him politely to stay out of something and catch a nap (like Rose and Noah dealings)
Experiment failed, but I'll have to admit that, for a while, I was in love with the romantic image that we would have an institutional culture starting from the G-league and working its way up; that we would play system ball valuing passing and defense, that we would build through draft and develop players.
Now we're watching YMCA ball on steroids. Can anyone honestly say what our identity is on offense or defense -- other than that our players are hungry and compete hard