Author | Thread |
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
10/10/2018 10:13 AM
Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Got this from realgm. Looks like our triangle that nobody runs anymore pg has a lot of teams interested in him. But y would that be? What is it about this triangle specific player that has teams interested. I cant put my finger on it? Not only that, but the Knicks haven't had any interest in trading him. Despite a regime change. Y would they want this triangle player when there is no more triangle? It don't make no sense? https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
AUTOADVERT |
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/28/2012 Member: #4451 |
10/10/2018 10:21 AM
newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: |
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
10/10/2018 11:30 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: When your being offered 2nd round picks and longer contracts, basically pure trash in return of course your going to Hang up the phone just like they did with offers for KOQ, Lee, Noah, THJ. Besides I never said trade frank, I said if there's was an opportunity to get a better player that fits or a higher pick they should entertain it. ES
|
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
10/10/2018 11:52 AM
knicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: So you after the Knicks spent a lottery pick on Frank. A team a few months later are gonna call up offering a 2nd round pick. Knowing that they would get hung up on a lose credibility in negotiations. Then you go on to compare him to Noah, KOQ, Lee and Tim as if they offered the same circumstance in terms of age, pay or potential. Brilliant! https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
Nalod
Posts: 68625 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
10/10/2018 11:59 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Remember, there are three sides to every story. |
Nalod
Posts: 68625 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
10/10/2018 12:02 PM
knicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: You never said trade Frank. You never answered the point of disrespect you think the media has on your time zone mistake. own up Rainman. |
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/28/2012 Member: #4451 |
10/10/2018 12:50 PM LAST EDITED: 10/10/2018 12:57 PM
knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: |
VDesai
Posts: 36949 Alba Posts: 44 Joined: 10/28/2003 Member: #477 USA |
10/10/2018 1:26 PM
Idiots who liked the Mo Taylor trade man up!!!
|
newyorknewyork
Posts: 29859 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 1/16/2004 Member: #541 |
10/10/2018 1:48 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: He knows better. He just went on a little emotional tantrum since Frank triggers these emotions for some reason. Then he will play victim. The deals negotiated were probably when Knicks tried to dump Noah or Lee and teams would demand Frank be apart of the deal to take on the players contract. Or if the Knicks seeked out a stud player doing due diligence. That team would ask for Frank as part of any deal to aquire said player. Those would be the most logcial scenarios. https://vote.nba.com/en Vote for your Knicks.
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
10/10/2018 2:21 PM LAST EDITED: 10/10/2018 2:21 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: seriously I like the kid but he is the only draft pick we have had in 15 yrs with a projected minus win pct ESTIMATED WINS ADDED AVERAGE Out of every pick we had, Frank is the worse on this list and KP and D Lee are the best since 2003. Now I'm not sure what goes into these stats, but he is the only player in RED http://www.draftexpress.com/clubhouse/Knicks-3/draft-picks-and-trades ES
|
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/28/2012 Member: #4451 |
10/10/2018 2:41 PM LAST EDITED: 10/10/2018 2:42 PM
knicks1248 wrote:Your big line is “I like the Kid BUT” lol. Dude just honest. You aren’t a fan of the kid d,hated the draft pick,and don’t want him on the team.StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: |
Nalod
Posts: 68625 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
10/10/2018 3:13 PM
knicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Your not only stupid, your lazy. At least your not color blind. From John Hollinger: EWA = Estimated Wins Added is Value Added divided by 30, giving the estimated number of wins a player adds to a team’s season total above what a "replacement player" would produce. BTW, how does one quantify this number? You don't understand it but you use it? Who did he replace? |
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/28/2012 Member: #4451 |
10/10/2018 3:42 PM
Nalod wrote:Honestly I dont know why I even bother with that guy. If he wont at least be upfront with his dissatisfaction with Frank and his selection then he should at least present credible facts to justifywhy frank doesnt fit in our future plan. I mean everyone else seems to be fair,objective, but still excited that frank is apart of the future. So either knicks 1248 knows more than all of us and the knicks organization or maybe he should reassess what he is sayingknicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: |
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
10/10/2018 4:41 PM
StarksEwing1 wrote:Nalod wrote:Honestly I dont know why I even bother with that guy. If he wont at least be upfront with his dissatisfaction with Frank and his selection then he should at least present credible facts to justifywhy frank doesnt fit in our future plan. I mean everyone else seems to be fair,objective, but still excited that frank is apart of the future. So either knicks 1248 knows more than all of us and the knicks organization or maybe he should reassess what he is sayingknicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: you 2 sound like you have wet dreams about this kid...lol You more obsess than Nix was about the triangle Nolad, most of the time your not even worth responding to your such a narrow mind bafoon. ES
|
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/28/2012 Member: #4451 |
10/10/2018 5:06 PM LAST EDITED: 10/10/2018 5:07 PM
knicks1248 wrote:What are you 5 years old or something? Just because I dont agree with your bull**** narrative about frank doesnt mean I have "wet dreams about the kid" ive been very honest about the kid. I never once said he was ever gonna be an all star let alone a star. If you look around this thread NOBODY buys into what you are saying so figure it outStarksEwing1 wrote:Nalod wrote:Honestly I dont know why I even bother with that guy. If he wont at least be upfront with his dissatisfaction with Frank and his selection then he should at least present credible facts to justifywhy frank doesnt fit in our future plan. I mean everyone else seems to be fair,objective, but still excited that frank is apart of the future. So either knicks 1248 knows more than all of us and the knicks organization or maybe he should reassess what he is sayingknicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: |
Nalod
Posts: 68625 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
10/10/2018 11:06 PM
knicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:Nalod wrote:Honestly I dont know why I even bother with that guy. If he wont at least be upfront with his dissatisfaction with Frank and his selection then he should at least present credible facts to justifywhy frank doesnt fit in our future plan. I mean everyone else seems to be fair,objective, but still excited that frank is apart of the future. So either knicks 1248 knows more than all of us and the knicks organization or maybe he should reassess what he is sayingknicks1248 wrote:StarksEwing1 wrote:knicks1248 wrote:You are really starting to make yourself look foolish. If you honestly think that a team was just offering a **** return for frank then you are really lost.StarksEwing1 wrote:newyorknewyork wrote:there you have it.Tweet was deleted or there was problem with the URL: Your correct. When you lack credibility requests for validity are not worth responding to. |