TripleThreat wrote:wargames wrote:smackeddog wrote:Melo trade looks even more ridiculous with every passing year- the equivalent today would be trading Mitch, Knox, Mario, Frank/trey Burke and 2 1st rounders for butler. Madness!
It was madness, but attitude reflects leadership (our to be more exact ownership) and us fans had been told for like 3 seasons we were going to go after Lebron in 2010. Far too often the knicks would look at players on other teams that were at their peak and want them instead of doing the work of developing their own youth.
LeBron James intentionally gave false hope to lots of teams. Lots of teams cleared space and made poor long term decisions because of it.
Not long after, the players took a massive hit in the next labor war. Thanks in part to LBJ inciting the owners. Many of them got on their knees and literally begged. Dumb **** actually was watching some soccer with Rich Paul and talking OVER an owner giving a presentation. What the ****.
No one is to blame for clearing space for LBJ. The signing of STAT was to soft justify that the team did something instead of nothing, which is on the Knicks.
I do not understand this "development" narrative that people keep pushing. Well the media pushes it and the front offices do because they don't have a choice.
You generally get a baseline idea very quickly in the NBA if a player can break out or not. The idea of "development" is overstated. Erik Spolestra getting a James Johnson to be useful is one thing, but to push a guy outside his talent ceiling/natural skill set into something more isn't likely.
Sometimes guys have injuries. Sometimes guys just never got the minutes. In rare cases, like Jeremy Lin, it's what amounts to open racism. But in most cases, while it takes three years to really know what a player can do, the early flashes are a tell on his ability to adapt/counter adapt to the league getting a scouting book on him.
I keep hearing "development" with Trey Burke. What in the entire hell are people talking about?
If you stop being a bull headed me first *******, because you are running out of teams to give you a chance, that's not actually development.
Butler is a good player. Odds are he will give more production in his 2 and half years of prime left compared to a lottery pick. Someone is going to compare Butler to the top pick in the draft and frankly the Knicks are not getting the top 3 picks in this upcoming draft.
Yeah Lebron was a complete d*ck in 2010. You are also right its got the owners heated and they took it out on everyone later.
With that said would my statement have been more clear if I had said "draft and developing their own youth". For example, Thibs put it out there he didn't want to trade Jimmy for picks and youth because he wanted to win now and not develop players. You are right about the talent ceiling of players but are completely disregarding the patience/time aspect of that as well. Victor Oladipo was drafted 2nd and everyone said "he could be a star" but 2 teams didn't have the patience to continue to work with him and he was looking like a journeyman until his 4th year. Gordon Hayward (who was drafted with a knicks pick) took about 4-5 years before he was a star caliber player and avg 5 pts his first season. Otto Porter who is a key part of the wizards as their 3&D SF avg 2 his rookie season.
Hell we didn't even have patience with Timmy and traded him and then had to pay to get him back once he went to another team and developed.
It takes players time to develop, and it requires teams to have the patience while they develop. The knicks didn't want to be patient until recently. Since Mills has come onto the knicks there has been a focus on either develping in house or getting guys who other teams developed but slipped under their radar. Its a smarter move than hoping for a star to want to come to NY. Especially with the amount of teams better built to win now like GSW, Rockets, Celtics, and even the raptors.
It makes a lot of sense to load up and try to get ready to be the team to beat in 3-5 years. Right now the Suns, and Philly and maybe Celtics (though I have a feeling the Celtics will have to shed youth to stay competitive now like the Lakers) are the only teams I would say have more young talent than the knicks do.