| Author | Thread |
| AUTOADVERT |
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
6/19/2018 7:39 PM
I would do the 9th, 36th and THJ for Doncic and Parsons.
|
|
KnixinSix
Posts: 20066 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/27/2013 Member: #5626 |
6/19/2018 10:58 PM
This guy has an idea for the trade . I would be amazed if we could pull that type of deal off though.
https://dailyknicks.com/2018/06/19/new-york-knicks-five-potential-trades-2018-nba-draft/ |
|
reub
Posts: 21836 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 1/13/2016 Member: #6227 |
6/19/2018 11:23 PM
KnixinSix wrote:This guy has an idea for the trade . I would be amazed if we could pull that type of deal off though. He's got five trade proposals, all with us giving up our 2nd round draft pick plus Courtney Lee. I don't think that gets you Doncic, even with taking on Parson's contract. |
|
Paris907
Posts: 21146 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/4/2015 Member: #6099 USA |
6/20/2018 5:58 AM
Sure I’d prefer Doncic but the other 4 picks are super this year. THJr KOQ? 36 = Parsons and # 4. Count me in.
Bamba and Knox w Frank and KP |
|
martin
Posts: 68676 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
6/20/2018 10:22 AM
Paris907 wrote:Sure I’d prefer Doncic but the other 4 picks are super this year. THJr KOQ? 36 = Parsons and # 4. Count me in. Im pretty sure any possible trade for #4 would also include Knicks giving up #9. Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
6/20/2018 10:45 AM
This is why I’m a proponent of tanking. The Knicks could have sucked enough to g t the pick they really want. Now we are trying to figure out ways to add an impact player by giving up assets. Then people wonder why I’m so down in the Knicks.
|
|
SupremeCommander
Posts: 33785 Alba Posts: 35 Joined: 4/28/2006 Member: #1127 |
6/20/2018 10:50 AM
I am waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay against trading future firsts. That said, if we can get our hands on another pick somehow, I'd still trade two picks for doncic
Sambakick wrote:
Gives a whole new meaning to "Jazz Hands"
|
|
martin
Posts: 68676 Alba Posts: 108 Joined: 7/24/2001 Member: #2 USA |
6/20/2018 10:52 AM
Vmart wrote:This is why I’m a proponent of tanking. The Knicks could have sucked enough to g t the pick they really want. Now we are trying to figure out ways to add an impact player by giving up assets. Then people wonder why I’m so down in the Knicks. Old boring story line. Knicks shoulda maybe sat KP when he was on his 40ppg streak early in the year? Official sponsor of the PURE KNICKS LOVE Program
|
|
fishmike
Posts: 53132 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
6/20/2018 10:59 AM
martin wrote:any good management would have had the foresight to stop those young players from doing so well.Vmart wrote:This is why I’m a proponent of tanking. The Knicks could have sucked enough to g t the pick they really want. Now we are trying to figure out ways to add an impact player by giving up assets. Then people wonder why I’m so down in the Knicks. "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
6/20/2018 11:01 AM
martin wrote:This. The Knicks had 25 games left on their schedule when KP went down. They went 6-19 to finish the year. They won only 24% of their games. That was worse then the percentage the Suns finished the year at.Vmart wrote:This is why I’m a proponent of tanking. The Knicks could have sucked enough to g t the pick they really want. Now we are trying to figure out ways to add an impact player by giving up assets. Then people wonder why I’m so down in the Knicks. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
|
Chandler
Posts: 26011 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
6/20/2018 11:18 AM
Vmart wrote:This is why I’m a proponent of tanking. The Knicks could have sucked enough to g t the pick they really want. Now we are trying to figure out ways to add an impact player by giving up assets. Then people wonder why I’m so down in the Knicks. I don't get this logic at all. It sounds appealing but go and look at like the last 10 or 20 years of drafts. Absent Tim (recall Boston tanked hard that year and had two lottery selections first and third and lost out), Shaq and Lebron even having the number 1 pick is far from a guarantee of success let alone greatness -- e.g., Anthony Davis phenomenal player and team has been blah to mediocre; Minny has Wiggins and KAT and countless lottery picks and they were blah to putrid until recently The organization needs a culture and identity that involves team building, player development, an identity that can succeed (whether that's GSW or Houston who knows but something better than schizophrenia). Silver bullet quick fixes are super rare (5)(5)
|
|
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
6/20/2018 12:38 PM
Chandler wrote:Vmart wrote:This is why I’m a proponent of tanking. The Knicks could have sucked enough to g t the pick they really want. Now we are trying to figure out ways to add an impact player by giving up assets. Then people wonder why I’m so down in the Knicks. some think I don't believe in the draft, but it's more like I don't believe in relying on the draft. If there is an opportunity to use my pick on an establish young play on the rise, why would I go with a potential bust. Not only would i have wasted a season tanking, you also contributed to a losing environment. ES
|
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
6/20/2018 2:08 PM
fishmike wrote:martin wrote:any good management would have had the foresight to stop those young players from doing so well.Vmart wrote:This is why I’m a proponent of tanking. The Knicks could have sucked enough to g t the pick they really want. Now we are trying to figure out ways to add an impact player by giving up assets. Then people wonder why I’m so down in the Knicks. Any good coach would have had the foresight to play the young players. |