Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
NardDogNation
Posts: 27294 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 5/7/2013 Member: #5555 |
6/12/2018 1:38 AM
Why does having Frank, preclude us from having Huerter? Why is this such an either-or proposition for you? Afterall, their skillsets seem to compliment each other well.
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
6/12/2018 2:31 AM LAST EDITED: 6/12/2018 12:01 PM
NardDogNation wrote:Why does having Frank, preclude us from having Huerter? Why is this such an either-or proposition for you? Afterall, their skillsets seem to compliment each other well. Yup...and I'm one of the guys who might consider taking Huerter over Mikal if he's gotten a little stronger. Briggs...I like this guy a lot, and I posted something on your original thread comparing him to Donic. If our people were to try him out, fall in love, and take him, I would fully support the choice, but taking him has NOTHING to do with Frank. Folks are aware that you dislike Ntilikina and only see him as a piece to get another pick in this draft, and not as a foundational player for the team, but if you think Huerter is that good, and the Knicks like him, we have an opportunity to get him with our #9. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|
smackeddog
Posts: 38386 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 3/30/2005 Member: #883 |
6/12/2018 2:48 AM
NardDogNation wrote:Why does having Frank, preclude us from having Huerter? Why is this such an either-or proposition for you? Afterall, their skillsets seem to compliment each other well. Because he's this years Frank Kaminsky! We MUST needlessly trade Ntilikina and future first round picks to obtain this player who's projected to be a late first round pick! |
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/28/2012 Member: #4451 |
6/12/2018 7:23 AM
smackeddog wrote:HaHa i remember that. For months Briggs went on and on about how Kaminsky was the next Larry Bird and of course that wasnt the case fairly early on and he never mentioned Kaminsky again. I have a feeling this will be eerily similarNardDogNation wrote:Why does having Frank, preclude us from having Huerter? Why is this such an either-or proposition for you? Afterall, their skillsets seem to compliment each other well. |
Ira
Posts: 24677 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 8/14/2001 Member: #91 |
6/12/2018 7:41 AM
I think Huerter's a good find and will be a good pro. He's got a very good shot and a well rounded game.
|
Nalod
Posts: 68482 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
6/12/2018 7:44 AM
Briggs is on one of his obsessive moods. Full Rainman mode. Once a year perhaps he falls in with a kid.
Perhaps the good news is he is not living on your street and have to get a restraining order on him. Watch the video enough times you’ll too fall for the kid. |
BRIGGS
Posts: 53275 Alba Posts: 7 Joined: 7/30/2002 Member: #303 |
6/12/2018 7:49 AM
WaltLongmire wrote:NardDogNation wrote:Why does having Frank, preclude us from having Huerter? Why is this such an either-or proposition for you? Afterall, their skillsets seem to compliment each other well. I dont dislike Frank at all. Im just wondering how to realistically acquire this player. I think if Wendall Carter sits at 9---its forcing my hand to take him. How can I get back in the draft to get Huerter? I dont mind giving up a top 10 protected pick + one of our future 2's and keeping Frank(although Im sure of his position) I have a special pick for 36 that I want the Knicks to look at(hopefully)--and there are some nice choices for UDA's but Im hoping this drfat can catapult us into an expedited rebuild. Im very much willing to keep Frank--but I need to use something valuable to get back in. RIP Crushalot😞
|
Vmart
Posts: 31800 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 5/23/2002 Member: #247 USA |
6/12/2018 8:33 AM
He will be there in the second round.
|
fishmike
Posts: 53040 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 7/19/2002 Member: #298 USA |
6/12/2018 8:54 AM
Im just happy about the "last post part."
Like thats gonna happen "winning is more fun... then fun is fun" -Thibs
|
franco12
Posts: 33150 Alba Posts: 4 Joined: 2/19/2004 Member: #599 USA |
6/12/2018 9:12 AM
Vmart wrote:He will be there in the second round. This & I have to believe there is some capped out team like GS that will be happy to trade out of the late first round and take our 2nd round pick. I do hope we see our team do something to get an additional pick in the draft or move up. |
Chandler
Posts: 25959 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 11/26/2015 Member: #6197 |
6/12/2018 9:45 AM
does he remind anyone of Sam Dekker (aka Who)
(5)(5)
|
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
6/12/2018 10:10 AM
BRIGGS wrote:Take a strong look at how this kid plays the game--think about how the Warriors win. I dont think this guy is any much different than Doncic if you look at video--what maybe 10 pounds? And Frank N has what skills like this????
The Knicks haven't even shown any interest in my boy Huerter so as much as i'd love for us to get him, i just don't see us being able to and without showing interest i don't even see us trying to find a way to get him. |
newyorker4ever
Posts: 26515 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/19/2014 Member: #5816 |
6/12/2018 10:13 AM
Vmart wrote:He will be there in the second round. No he won't |
SupremeCommander
Posts: 33767 Alba Posts: 35 Joined: 4/28/2006 Member: #1127 |
6/12/2018 10:30 AM
StarksEwing1 wrote:smackeddog wrote:HaHa i remember that. For months Briggs went on and on about how Kaminsky was the next Larry Bird and of course that wasnt the case fairly early on and he never mentioned Kaminsky again. I have a feeling this will be eerily similarNardDogNation wrote:Why does having Frank, preclude us from having Huerter? Why is this such an either-or proposition for you? Afterall, their skillsets seem to compliment each other well. In fairness, he said Kaminsky was the next Dirk I guess Briggs is trying to say right now Huerter is the next Klay? Sambakick wrote:
Gives a whole new meaning to "Jazz Hands"
|
Nalod
Posts: 68482 Alba Posts: 154 Joined: 12/24/2003 Member: #508 USA |
6/12/2018 10:39 AM
Can't try to remake warrior in our own image.
Trae is not Curry. Huerter is not Klay. GSW will wither as all champions do at some point or will be vulnerable to another element. |
knicks1248
Posts: 42059 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 2/3/2004 Member: #582 |
6/12/2018 11:26 AM
Vmart wrote:He will be there in the second round. thats what i would think, but it will be very early in the 2nd rnd, like top 3 ES
|
StarksEwing1
Posts: 32671 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 12/28/2012 Member: #4451 |
6/12/2018 11:50 AM
SupremeCommander wrote:You are right. Yeah i thinkme mentioned him being the next Klay already Trutshfully there have be about 20 different guys briggs had pegged as the net big player that i lose track lolStarksEwing1 wrote:smackeddog wrote:HaHa i remember that. For months Briggs went on and on about how Kaminsky was the next Larry Bird and of course that wasnt the case fairly early on and he never mentioned Kaminsky again. I have a feeling this will be eerily similarNardDogNation wrote:Why does having Frank, preclude us from having Huerter? Why is this such an either-or proposition for you? Afterall, their skillsets seem to compliment each other well. |
Cartman718
Posts: 29068 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 10/12/2007 Member: #1694 |
6/12/2018 11:53 AM
newyorker4ever wrote:Vmart wrote:He will be there in the second round. steve novak Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL
So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree
|
WaltLongmire
Posts: 27623 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 6/28/2014 Member: #5843 |
6/12/2018 12:02 PM
Vmart wrote:He will be there in the second round. No way...really...no way. EnySpree: Can we agree to agree not to mention Phil Jackson and triangle for the rest of our lives?
|