meloshouldgo wrote:Cartman718 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:knicks1248 wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Another year, we failed to play the odds with any degree of competence and came back with a low draft pick.
And at one time we were tied with Sacramento and threw all that away by winning meaningless games.
Best believe there will be at least 2 very good players available at 9, and a quite a few bad ones, do you trust perry and mills to make te right pick or trade
I have very little insight into their thinking. I would be happy with Mikal Bridges.
I won’t bitch about Mikal but if we take him I believe we will pass on 3-5 other players with more long term upside. We need to draft for talent...lot of these kids are 2 years younger than Mikal.
This is exactly my concern. He has 3 more years to grow into who he will be probably for the rest of his career.
Why is that a cocern?
3 years is not a long time in the NBA? thats why. You always draft on 2 factors...
potential + age.
In this case, potential is great, but age is not great. If he was a freshman doing what he did at Villanova, I'd take him in a heartbeat.
Nixluva is posting triangle screen grabs, even when nobody asks - Fishmike. LOL
So are we going to reference that thread like the bible now? "The thread of Wroten Page 14 post 9" - EnySpree