Author | Thread |
AUTOADVERT |
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27195 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
5/16/2018 4:47 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Thanks for clearing things up about thread. It explains a lot.CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:I am not a Melo fan, I am a Knick fan. I hated Melo when he was a Nugget and I didn't like the trade when it happened. But I absolutely will root for a guy in a Knick uniform when he is a Knick. My issue is with guys that would rather not have the Knick team have success if it meant Melo was being featured like he was back when Woodson took over. So I'll ask again, is this your thread?CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Did you watch OKC at all or listen to any analysis on their offense?CrushAlot wrote:martin wrote:I do think he hated it but the one thing you heard about Melo from reporters that covered the team closely was that he did not complain about his role during the season and was a very good teammate. His comments at the end of the season certainly indicate that he did not like the role. I watched them the most in the playoffs and liked their team a lot with Grant in and Melo out. But in Melo's defense, I couldn't see an offense being run with OKC. A team with a more structured offense and more of a distributor at the point might help him be more effective in a stretch four role. As Gustav said though, his pride might not let him take on that role.GustavBahler wrote:blkexec wrote:GustavBahler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:There is no reason to bring Melo back.I agree with this. He also wants to chase a ring and the Knicks are rebuilding. If he wanted to retire as a knick in a few years maybe you consider it at the deadline but the Knicks and Melo have both moved on. It was for the best for both parties. No reason to revisit him being on the team. Bro, just tell him about your Lin poster in your room. Stop hiding the real reason you hate Melo. Reason why you get so emotional when challenged on him. If Crush, the most sensible and well informed poster on here, gets under your skin, then maybe I am wrong and its not just Lins poster you have on your bedroom wall. I think you may be right though. It was Melos fault we went from 54 wins to several crappy rebuild years. And if he had not pushed Lin out we would have won at least 3 chips. I mean look at how Lin went on to transform Houston, Lakers, Charlotte and Brooklyn to Champions. 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/3/2014 Member: #5801 |
5/17/2018 7:09 PM
HofstraBBall wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Thanks for clearing things up about thread. It explains a lot.CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:I am not a Melo fan, I am a Knick fan. I hated Melo when he was a Nugget and I didn't like the trade when it happened. But I absolutely will root for a guy in a Knick uniform when he is a Knick. My issue is with guys that would rather not have the Knick team have success if it meant Melo was being featured like he was back when Woodson took over. So I'll ask again, is this your thread?CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Did you watch OKC at all or listen to any analysis on their offense?CrushAlot wrote:martin wrote:I do think he hated it but the one thing you heard about Melo from reporters that covered the team closely was that he did not complain about his role during the season and was a very good teammate. His comments at the end of the season certainly indicate that he did not like the role. I watched them the most in the playoffs and liked their team a lot with Grant in and Melo out. But in Melo's defense, I couldn't see an offense being run with OKC. A team with a more structured offense and more of a distributor at the point might help him be more effective in a stretch four role. As Gustav said though, his pride might not let him take on that role.GustavBahler wrote:blkexec wrote:GustavBahler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:There is no reason to bring Melo back.I agree with this. He also wants to chase a ring and the Knicks are rebuilding. If he wanted to retire as a knick in a few years maybe you consider it at the deadline but the Knicks and Melo have both moved on. It was for the best for both parties. No reason to revisit him being on the team. Bro?? Really?? Awwwww that's so sweet. I got emotional? Crush gets all misty eyed whenever I mention Melo, maybe he has a Crush on him? Crush brings up his phantom thread and you bring up Lin? That all you got? Revenge of the Melo fans? Y'all need to recruit Einstein as well. I mean please add more to bull**** to your speil, it's fascinating. Hide? I am easy to find, Bro! (LOL) I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
5/17/2018 7:39 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:It isn't a phantom thread. It was someone that wasn't enjoying the Knicks winning because Melo was playing well, and Woodson was coaching. After years of losing, someone telling others to tone down their enjoyment with winning was pretty messed up in my opinion. It was smart of you to come back with a different user name but you post the same stuff and refer to things that happened on this forum long before your current user name was in use on here. If the Knicks went 18-5 after adding Mudiay would you be happy they were winning or pissed that Mudiay was starting over Frank?HofstraBBall wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Thanks for clearing things up about thread. It explains a lot.CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:I am not a Melo fan, I am a Knick fan. I hated Melo when he was a Nugget and I didn't like the trade when it happened. But I absolutely will root for a guy in a Knick uniform when he is a Knick. My issue is with guys that would rather not have the Knick team have success if it meant Melo was being featured like he was back when Woodson took over. So I'll ask again, is this your thread?CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Did you watch OKC at all or listen to any analysis on their offense?CrushAlot wrote:martin wrote:I do think he hated it but the one thing you heard about Melo from reporters that covered the team closely was that he did not complain about his role during the season and was a very good teammate. His comments at the end of the season certainly indicate that he did not like the role. I watched them the most in the playoffs and liked their team a lot with Grant in and Melo out. But in Melo's defense, I couldn't see an offense being run with OKC. A team with a more structured offense and more of a distributor at the point might help him be more effective in a stretch four role. As Gustav said though, his pride might not let him take on that role.GustavBahler wrote:blkexec wrote:GustavBahler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:There is no reason to bring Melo back.I agree with this. He also wants to chase a ring and the Knicks are rebuilding. If he wanted to retire as a knick in a few years maybe you consider it at the deadline but the Knicks and Melo have both moved on. It was for the best for both parties. No reason to revisit him being on the team. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
meloshouldgo
Posts: 26565 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 5/3/2014 Member: #5801 |
5/17/2018 9:30 PM LAST EDITED: 5/17/2018 9:33 PM
CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:It isn't a phantom thread. It was someone that wasn't enjoying the Knicks winning because Melo was playing well, and Woodson was coaching. After years of losing, someone telling others to tone down their enjoyment with winning was pretty messed up in my opinion. It was smart of you to come back with a different user name but you post the same stuff and refer to things that happened on this forum long before your current user name was in use on here. If the Knicks went 18-5 after adding Mudiay would you be happy they were winning or pissed that Mudiay was starting over Frank?HofstraBBall wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Thanks for clearing things up about thread. It explains a lot.CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:I am not a Melo fan, I am a Knick fan. I hated Melo when he was a Nugget and I didn't like the trade when it happened. But I absolutely will root for a guy in a Knick uniform when he is a Knick. My issue is with guys that would rather not have the Knick team have success if it meant Melo was being featured like he was back when Woodson took over. So I'll ask again, is this your thread?CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Did you watch OKC at all or listen to any analysis on their offense?CrushAlot wrote:martin wrote:I do think he hated it but the one thing you heard about Melo from reporters that covered the team closely was that he did not complain about his role during the season and was a very good teammate. His comments at the end of the season certainly indicate that he did not like the role. I watched them the most in the playoffs and liked their team a lot with Grant in and Melo out. But in Melo's defense, I couldn't see an offense being run with OKC. A team with a more structured offense and more of a distributor at the point might help him be more effective in a stretch four role. As Gustav said though, his pride might not let him take on that role.GustavBahler wrote:blkexec wrote:GustavBahler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:There is no reason to bring Melo back.I agree with this. He also wants to chase a ring and the Knicks are rebuilding. If he wanted to retire as a knick in a few years maybe you consider it at the deadline but the Knicks and Melo have both moved on. It was for the best for both parties. No reason to revisit him being on the team. Someone telling you to "tone down your enjoyment because Melo was winning?" Is that it? Your precious little feelings for Melo were hurt? And you held the grudge for 15 years? This is why a grown ass man actively trolls me on every thread? Are you serious? I am at a loss for words (and trust me this doesn't happen very often). Sounds like you take your posting and your "position" here waaay too seriously. It's an internet forum for basketball and sometime politics - but I don't see you discussing basketball or politics. In fact I don't see you contributing anythng original at all. All you do is post opinion pieces and hatchet jobs that you call "articles" and a bucnh of tweets. I don't see you add anything of value, any original thought or content of your own on any topic of any kind. And it's entirely possible I have missed some of your posts - I don't claim to read everything. But a lot of people bring their own thoughts, analysis etc. As far as I can tell you bring nothing. When you are not linking to something you are regurgitating the same thing from something you linked to before. But that's your prerogative and this isn't criticism, I guess I just don't understand you or your motivation. And your lack of independent thought/imagination leaves me mystified. - BTW this stuff is just my opinion based on reading your posts. I have no special insight into your character. You may well be the life of the party everywhere you go. I cannot teach anybody anything. I can only try to make them think - Socrates
|
CrushAlot
Posts: 59764 Alba Posts: 0 Joined: 7/25/2003 Member: #452 USA |
5/17/2018 10:10 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:You are right you missed something.CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:It isn't a phantom thread. It was someone that wasn't enjoying the Knicks winning because Melo was playing well, and Woodson was coaching. After years of losing, someone telling others to tone down their enjoyment with winning was pretty messed up in my opinion. It was smart of you to come back with a different user name but you post the same stuff and refer to things that happened on this forum long before your current user name was in use on here. If the Knicks went 18-5 after adding Mudiay would you be happy they were winning or pissed that Mudiay was starting over Frank?HofstraBBall wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Thanks for clearing things up about thread. It explains a lot.CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:I am not a Melo fan, I am a Knick fan. I hated Melo when he was a Nugget and I didn't like the trade when it happened. But I absolutely will root for a guy in a Knick uniform when he is a Knick. My issue is with guys that would rather not have the Knick team have success if it meant Melo was being featured like he was back when Woodson took over. So I'll ask again, is this your thread?CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Did you watch OKC at all or listen to any analysis on their offense?CrushAlot wrote:martin wrote:I do think he hated it but the one thing you heard about Melo from reporters that covered the team closely was that he did not complain about his role during the season and was a very good teammate. His comments at the end of the season certainly indicate that he did not like the role. I watched them the most in the playoffs and liked their team a lot with Grant in and Melo out. But in Melo's defense, I couldn't see an offense being run with OKC. A team with a more structured offense and more of a distributor at the point might help him be more effective in a stretch four role. As Gustav said though, his pride might not let him take on that role.GustavBahler wrote:blkexec wrote:GustavBahler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:There is no reason to bring Melo back.I agree with this. He also wants to chase a ring and the Knicks are rebuilding. If he wanted to retire as a knick in a few years maybe you consider it at the deadline but the Knicks and Melo have both moved on. It was for the best for both parties. No reason to revisit him being on the team. I'm tired,I'm tired, I'm so tired right now......Kristaps Porzingis 1/3/18
|
HofstraBBall
Posts: 27195 Alba Posts: 1 Joined: 11/21/2015 Member: #6192 |
5/18/2018 10:46 PM
meloshouldgo wrote:HofstraBBall wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Thanks for clearing things up about thread. It explains a lot.CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:I am not a Melo fan, I am a Knick fan. I hated Melo when he was a Nugget and I didn't like the trade when it happened. But I absolutely will root for a guy in a Knick uniform when he is a Knick. My issue is with guys that would rather not have the Knick team have success if it meant Melo was being featured like he was back when Woodson took over. So I'll ask again, is this your thread?CrushAlot wrote:meloshouldgo wrote:Did you watch OKC at all or listen to any analysis on their offense?CrushAlot wrote:martin wrote:I do think he hated it but the one thing you heard about Melo from reporters that covered the team closely was that he did not complain about his role during the season and was a very good teammate. His comments at the end of the season certainly indicate that he did not like the role. I watched them the most in the playoffs and liked their team a lot with Grant in and Melo out. But in Melo's defense, I couldn't see an offense being run with OKC. A team with a more structured offense and more of a distributor at the point might help him be more effective in a stretch four role. As Gustav said though, his pride might not let him take on that role.GustavBahler wrote:blkexec wrote:GustavBahler wrote:CrushAlot wrote:Nalod wrote:There is no reason to bring Melo back.I agree with this. He also wants to chase a ring and the Knicks are rebuilding. If he wanted to retire as a knick in a few years maybe you consider it at the deadline but the Knicks and Melo have both moved on. It was for the best for both parties. No reason to revisit him being on the team. Bro, think you have inhaled a bit too much dust. Take a deep breath. 'Knicks focus should be on players that have grown up playing soccer or cricket' - Triplethreat 8/28/2020
|